Restorative Section, Melbourne Dental School, Melbourne University, 720 Swanston Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2021 May 28;29(2):119-127. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2121Abduo09.
Chairside CAD/CAM is a convenient approach for fabricating dental restorations. However, the effect of CAD/CAM restoration type on marginal fit accuracy has not been fully investigated. This study evaluated of the marginal fit accuracy of 3 chairside CAD/ CAM restoration types (crown, inlay and onlay) using CEREC Bluecam (BC) and CEREC Omnicam (OC) scanners. Three artificial maxillary first molars received crown, inlay and onlay preparations. A total of 10 CAD/CAM ceramic restorations were produced for each tooth by each intraoral scanner. The marginal gap was measured along the preparation margin. For the BC, all the restorations had similar marginal gaps (crowns = 113.9 μm; inlays = 120.9 μm; onlays = 132.5 μm) (p = 0.20), while for the OC, the crowns (72.2 μm) and the inlays (74.9 μm) exhibited better marginal fit than the onlays (96.4 μm) (p = 0.003). For every restoration type, the OC provided a superior outcome compared with the BC. Therefore, the restoration type influenced the marginal gap, where the crowns tended to have the least marginal gap while the onlays had the greatest marginal gap. The newer scanner (OC) of the same manufacturer was more accurate than the older scanner (BC).
椅旁 CAD/CAM 是制作牙科修复体的一种便捷方法。然而,CAD/CAM 修复类型对边缘适合精度的影响尚未得到充分研究。本研究评估了 3 种椅旁 CAD/CAM 修复类型(牙冠、嵌体和高嵌体)的边缘适合精度,使用 CEREC Bluecam(BC)和 CEREC Omnicam(OC)扫描仪。三个人工上颌第一磨牙接受了牙冠、嵌体和高嵌体预备。每个口内扫描仪为每个牙齿制作了总共 10 个 CAD/CAM 陶瓷修复体。沿预备边缘测量边缘间隙。对于 BC,所有修复体的边缘间隙相似(牙冠 = 113.9 μm;嵌体 = 120.9 μm;高嵌体 = 132.5 μm)(p = 0.20),而对于 OC,牙冠(72.2 μm)和嵌体(74.9 μm)的边缘拟合优于高嵌体(96.4 μm)(p = 0.003)。对于每种修复类型,OC 都比 BC 提供了更好的结果。因此,修复类型影响了边缘间隙,牙冠的边缘间隙最小,而高嵌体的边缘间隙最大。同一制造商的较新扫描仪(OC)比旧扫描仪(BC)更准确。