Suppr超能文献

正念和冥想对迷走神经介导的心率变异性的影响:一项荟萃分析。

The Effects of Mindfulness and Meditation on Vagally Mediated Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

From the La Trobe University (Brown, Morris), Melbourne; Melbourne School of Psychological sciences (Brown, Van Dam), University of Melbourne, Parkville; North Eastern Rehabilitation Centre (Brown, Morris), Healthscope Hospitals, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Suffolk University (Rando), Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior (Eichel), Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Psychiatry (Van Dam), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Massachusetts General Hospital (Celano, Huffman); and Harvard Medical School (Celano, Huffman), Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Psychosom Med. 2021;83(6):631-640. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000900.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a marker of autonomic nervous system function associated with both physical and mental health. Many studies have suggested that mindfulness and meditation-based interventions (MBIs) are associated with improvements in HRV, but findings are mixed, and to date, no comprehensive meta-analysis has synthesized results.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were conducted using PsycINFO, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, ERIC, and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of predominantly seated MBIs on resting-state vagally mediated HRV. Risk of bias was judged using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Random-effects meta-analysis found that MBIs were not efficacious in increasing vagally mediated resting-state HRV relative to control conditions (Hedges g = 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.014 to 0.77). When removing an outlier (g = 3.22), the effect size was reduced, CI narrowed, and findings remained nonsignificant (g = 0.19, 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.39). High heterogeneity in results (I2 = 89.12%) could not be explained by a priori-determined moderators including intervention duration, study setting, and control type.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient evidence to indicate that MBIs lead to improvements in vagally mediated HRV over control conditions. Future large, well-designed RCTs with low risk of methodological bias could help add to the current evidence to elucidate any role MBIs might play in impacting HRV.

摘要

目的

心率变异性(HRV)是自主神经系统功能的标志物,与身心健康都有关联。许多研究表明,正念和基于冥想的干预(MBIs)与 HRV 的改善有关,但结果喜忧参半,迄今为止,尚无综合分析来综合这些结果。

方法

系统地在 PsycINFO、Embase、Medline、CINAHL、ERIC 和 Scopus 中进行文献检索,以确定主要为坐姿的 MBIs 对静息状态下迷走神经介导的 HRV 的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。

结果

19 项 RCT 符合纳入荟萃分析的标准。随机效应荟萃分析发现,与对照条件相比,MBIs 并不能有效地增加迷走神经介导的静息状态 HRV(Hedges g = 0.38,95%置信区间 [CI] = -0.014 至 0.77)。当去除一个异常值(g = 3.22)时,效应大小减小,CI 变窄,结果仍无统计学意义(g = 0.19,95%CI = -0.02 至 0.39)。结果的高度异质性(I2 = 89.12%)无法用预先确定的调节因素来解释,包括干预持续时间、研究地点和对照类型。

结论

目前尚无足够的证据表明 MBIs 会导致迷走神经介导的 HRV 改善超过对照条件。未来的大型、设计良好的 RCT,方法学偏倚风险低,可以帮助增加当前证据,阐明 MBIs 可能在影响 HRV 方面发挥的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f0c/8243562/9d6d5b682626/nihms-1653967-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验