Laboratoire Cellules Souches et Régénération Cellulaire et Tissulaire, Center of Biological and Medical Sciences CIAM, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Lot 660, Hay Moulay Rachid, 43150, Ben Guerir, Morocco.
Centre des Brûlés et chirurgie réparatrice, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ibn Rochd Casablanca, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie Casablanca, Casablanca, Morocco.
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-02006-w.
Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have raised big interest in therapeutic applications in regenerative medicine and appear to fulfill the criteria for a successful cell therapy. Their low immunogenicity and their ability to self-renew, to differentiate into different tissue-specific progenitors, to migrate into damaged sites, and to act through autocrine and paracrine pathways have been altogether testified as the main mechanisms whereby cell repair and regeneration occur. The absence of standardization protocols in cell management within laboratories or facilities added to the new technologies improved at patient's bedside and the discrepancies in cell outcomes and engraftment increase the limitations on their widespread use by balancing their real benefit versus the patient safety and security. Also, comparisons across pooled patients are particularly difficult in the fact that multiple medical devices are used and there is absence of harmonized assessment assays despite meeting regulations agencies and efficient GMP protocols. Moreover, the emergence of the COVID-19 breakdown added to the complexity of implementing standardization. Cell- and tissue-based therapies are completely dependent on the biological manifestations and parameters associated to and induced by this virus where the scope is still unknown. The initial flow chart identified for stem cell therapies should be reformulated and updated to overcome patient infection and avoid significant variability, thus enabling more patient safety and therapeutic efficiency. The aim of this work is to highlight the major guidelines and differences in ADSC processing meeting the current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) and the cellular therapy-related policies. Specific insights on standardization of ADSCs proceeding at different check points are also presented as a setup for the cord blood and bone marrow.
脂肪来源干细胞(ADSCs)在再生医学的治疗应用中引起了极大的兴趣,似乎满足了成功细胞治疗的标准。它们的低免疫原性和自我更新能力、分化为不同组织特异性祖细胞、迁移到受损部位以及通过自分泌和旁分泌途径发挥作用,这些都是细胞修复和再生发生的主要机制。细胞管理在实验室或设施内缺乏标准化协议,加上在患者床边改进的新技术,以及细胞结果和植入的差异,增加了它们广泛应用的限制,需要在平衡其实际效益与患者安全和保障方面进行权衡。此外,由于使用了多种医疗设备,尽管符合监管机构和高效的 GMP 协议,但仍缺乏统一的评估检测方法,因此对 pooled 患者进行比较尤其困难。此外,COVID-19 爆发的出现增加了实施标准化的复杂性。细胞和组织治疗完全依赖于与该病毒相关的生物学表现和参数,并受其诱导,而其范围仍不清楚。最初为干细胞疗法确定的流程图应重新制定和更新,以克服患者感染并避免显著的可变性,从而提高更多患者的安全性和治疗效率。这项工作的目的是强调满足当前良好生产规范(cGMP)和细胞治疗相关政策的 ADSC 处理的主要指南和差异。还介绍了在不同检查点进行 ADSC 标准化的具体见解,作为脐带血和骨髓的设置。