Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th St., Box 294, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):1970-1975. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08228-6. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
The frequency of robotic-assisted bariatric surgery has been on the rise. An increasing number of fellowship programs have adopted robotic surgery as part of the curriculum. Our aim was to compare technical efficiency of a surgeon during the first year of practice after completing an advanced minimally invasive fellowship with a mentor surgeon.
A systematic review of a prospectively maintained database was performed of consecutive patients undergoing robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy between 2015 and 2019 at a tertiary-care bariatric center (mentor group) and between 2018 and 2019 at a semi-academic community-based bariatric program (mentee 1 group) and 2019-2020 at a tertiary-care academic center (mentee 2 group).
257 patients in the mentor group, 45 patients in the mentee 1 group, and 11 patients in the mentee 2 group were included. The mentee operative times during the first year in practice were significantly faster than the mentor's times in the first three (mentee 1 group) and two (mentee 2 group) years (P < 0.05) but remained significantly longer than the mentor's times in the last two (mentee 1 group) and one (mentee 2 group) years (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in venothromboembolic events (P = 0.89) or readmission rates (P = 0.93). The mean length of stay was 1.8 ± 0.5 days, 1.3 ± 0.5 days, and 1.5 ± 0.5 days in the mentor, mentee 1, and mentee 2 groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). There were no reoperations, conversion to laparoscopy or open, no staple line leaks, strictures, or deaths in any group.
This is one of the first series to show that the robotic platform can safely be taught and may translate into outcomes consistent with surgeons with more experience while mitigating the learning curve as early as the first year in practice. Long-term follow-up of mentees will be necessary to assess the evolution of fellowship training and outcomes.
机器人辅助减重手术的频率一直在上升。越来越多的奖学金项目已经将机器人手术作为课程的一部分。我们的目的是比较一位外科医生在完成高级微创奖学金并与导师一起实践的第一年的技术效率。
对 2015 年至 2019 年在一家三级保健减肥中心进行机器人辅助袖状胃切除术的连续患者(导师组)以及 2018 年至 2019 年在一家半学术性社区减肥计划(学员 1 组)和 2019 年至 2020 年在一家三级保健学术中心(学员 2 组)进行前瞻性维护数据库的系统回顾。
导师组 257 例患者,学员 1 组 45 例患者,学员 2 组 11 例患者。学员在实践的第一年的手术时间明显快于导师在前三(学员 1 组)和两年(学员 2 组)的时间(P<0.05),但仍明显长于导师在最后两年(学员 1 组)和一年(学员 2 组)的时间(P<0.05)。静脉血栓栓塞事件(P=0.89)或再入院率(P=0.93)无显著差异。导师、学员 1 组和学员 2 组的平均住院时间分别为 1.8±0.5 天、1.3±0.5 天和 1.5±0.5 天(P<0.0001)。任何一组均无再次手术、转为腹腔镜或开放、无吻合口渗漏、狭窄或死亡。
这是首批系列研究之一,表明机器人平台可以安全地教授,并且可能转化为与经验更丰富的外科医生一致的结果,同时在实践的第一年就减轻学习曲线。需要对学员进行长期随访,以评估奖学金培训和结果的演变。