• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

收集患者生成的健康数据以增强癌症登记监测的可行性。

Feasibility of collecting patient-generated health data to enhance cancer registry surveillance.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.

ICF Inc., 9300 Lee Hwy., Fairfax, VA, 22031, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Oct;15(5):785-791. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00970-z. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11764-020-00970-z
PMID:33400151
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patient-generated health data (PGHD) can provide information about population-level patterns in health outcomes that patients experience during cancer survivorship. Cancer registries do not collect PGHD as part of routine operations. This study assessed the feasibility of online collection of PGHD to augment cancer registry data.

METHODS

Cancer survivors who (1) were aged 50 or older, (2) had been diagnosed with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer, and (3) received their diagnosis within 10 years of the study start date were recruited at four Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry program sites. Each site was required to collect PGHD at baseline and a future time point to assess the feasibility of longitudinal methods. All sites collected data through a survey or questionnaire(s); each site employed unique methods to administer their surveys.

RESULTS

Across the sites, initial recruitment appeared to be the most challenging aspect in establishing a longitudinal cohort from the SEER sampling frame, with participation rates ranging from 3 to 17%. However, once enrolled, the percentage of survivors completing surveys at multiple time points was relatively high, ranging from 48 to 91%.

CONCLUSION

Augmenting cancer registry data with longitudinally collected PGHD is feasible, although more work is needed to overcome barriers of initial patient recruitment and adoption of online PGHD collection techniques for public health surveillance.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Registry data, including PGHD, can provide the medical community with patient perspectives on treatment effects and quality of life and can offer cancer survivors information about symptom management and advances in research.

摘要

目的

患者生成的健康数据(PGHD)可以提供有关癌症患者在生存期间健康结果的人群水平模式的信息。癌症登记处不作为常规操作收集 PGHD。本研究评估了在线收集 PGHD 以补充癌症登记处数据的可行性。

方法

在四个监测、流行病学和结果(SEER)癌症登记计划地点招募了符合以下条件的癌症幸存者:(1)年龄在 50 岁或以上,(2)被诊断患有乳腺癌、前列腺癌或结直肠癌,(3)在研究开始日期的 10 年内接受诊断。每个地点都需要在基线和未来时间点收集 PGHD,以评估纵向方法的可行性。所有地点都通过调查或问卷收集数据;每个地点都采用独特的方法来管理他们的调查。

结果

在各个地点,从 SEER 抽样框架中建立纵向队列似乎最初的招募是最具挑战性的方面,参与率从 3%到 17%不等。然而,一旦被招募,在多个时间点完成调查的幸存者比例相对较高,从 48%到 91%不等。

结论

通过纵向收集 PGHD 来补充癌症登记处的数据是可行的,尽管需要做更多的工作来克服初始患者招募的障碍,并采用在线 PGHD 收集技术进行公共卫生监测。

对癌症幸存者的影响

包括 PGHD 在内的登记处数据可以为医学界提供关于治疗效果和生活质量的患者观点,并为癌症幸存者提供有关症状管理和研究进展的信息。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of collecting patient-generated health data to enhance cancer registry surveillance.收集患者生成的健康数据以增强癌症登记监测的可行性。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Oct;15(5):785-791. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00970-z. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Cancer survivor perspectives on sharing patient-generated health data with central cancer registries.癌症幸存者对与中央癌症登记处共享患者生成的健康数据的看法。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Nov;28(11):2957-2967. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02263-0. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
3
Feasibility test of a UK-scalable electronic system for regular collection of patient-reported outcome measures and linkage with clinical cancer registry data: the electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system.用于定期收集患者报告的结局测量指标并与临床癌症登记数据链接的英国可扩展电子系统的可行性测试:电子癌症幸存者报告的结局(ePOCS)系统。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Oct 26;11:66. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-66.
4
Integrating patient reported outcomes with clinical cancer registry data: a feasibility study of the electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes From Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system.将患者报告结局与临床癌症登记数据相结合:癌症幸存者电子患者报告结局(ePOCS)系统的可行性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Oct 25;15(10):e230. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2764.
5
Patient-reported outcomes in survivors of breast cancer one, three, and five years post-diagnosis: a cancer registry-based feasibility study.乳腺癌患者诊断后 1、3、5 年的患者报告结局:一项基于癌症登记的可行性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02652-w. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
Utilizing SEER Cancer Registries for Population-Based Cancer Survivor Epidemiologic Studies: A Feasibility Study.利用 SEER 癌症登记处进行基于人群的癌症幸存者流行病学研究:一项可行性研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Sep;29(9):1699-1709. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0153. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
7
Cancer survivors not participating in observational patient-reported outcome studies have a lower survival compared to participants: the population-based PROFILES registry.与参与者相比,未参与观察性患者报告结局研究的癌症幸存者的生存率较低:基于人群的 PROFILES 注册研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Dec;27(12):3313-3324. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1979-0. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
8
Evaluating long-term patient-centered outcomes following prostate cancer treatment: findings from the Michigan Prostate Cancer Survivor study.评估前列腺癌治疗后长期以患者为中心的结局:密歇根前列腺癌生存者研究的结果。
J Cancer Surviv. 2014 Mar;8(1):121-30. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0312-8. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
9
Population-based survivorship research using cancer registries: a study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors.利用癌症登记处进行的基于人群的生存研究:非霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者的一项研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2007 Mar;1(1):49-63. doi: 10.1007/s11764-007-0004-3.
10
'We are very individual': anticipated effects on stroke survivors of using their person-generated health data.“我们非常个体化”:使用个人生成的健康数据对中风幸存者的预期影响。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2020 Sep;27(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100149.

引用本文的文献

1
Recruitment of sexual minority and heterosexual colorectal cancer survivors through US cancer registries.通过美国癌症登记处招募性少数群体和异性恋结直肠癌幸存者。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Jun;18(3):983-995. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01343-y. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
2
Mobile Health Apps for Breast Cancer: Content Analysis and Quality Assessment.移动医疗应用程序在乳腺癌中的应用:内容分析与质量评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Feb 23;11:e43522. doi: 10.2196/43522.