Suppr超能文献

《新冠疫情政策对美国社交隔离行为的即时影响》

The Immediate Effect of COVID-19 Policies on Social-Distancing Behavior in the United States.

机构信息

15665 Department of Economics, Finance and Global Business, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USA.

1848 College of Engineering and Network Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2021 Mar-Apr;136(2):245-252. doi: 10.1177/0033354920976575. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although anecdotal evidence indicates the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) social-distancing policies, their effectiveness in relation to what is driven by public awareness and voluntary actions needs to be determined. We evaluated the effectiveness of the 6 most common social-distancing policies in the United States (statewide stay-at-home orders, limited stay-at-home orders, nonessential business closures, bans on large gatherings, school closure mandates, and limits on restaurants and bars) during the early stage of the pandemic.

METHODS

We applied difference-in-differences and event-study methodologies to evaluate the effect of the 6 social-distancing policies on Google-released aggregated, anonymized daily location data on movement trends over time by state for all 50 states and the District of Columbia in 6 location categories: retail and recreation, grocery stores and pharmacies, parks, transit stations, workplaces, and residences. We compared the outcome of interest in states that adopted COVID-19-related policies with states that did not adopt such policies, before and after these policies took effect during February 15-April 25, 2020.

RESULTS

Statewide stay-at-home orders had the strongest effect on reducing out-of-home mobility and increased the time people spent at home by an estimated 2.5 percentage points (15.2%) from before to after policies took effect. Limits on restaurants and bars ranked second and resulted in an increase in presence at home by an estimated 1.4 percentage points (8.5%). The other 4 policies did not significantly reduce mobility.

CONCLUSION

Statewide stay-at-home orders and limits on bars and restaurants were most closely linked to reduced mobility in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas the potential benefits of other such policies may have already been reaped from voluntary social distancing. Further research is needed to understand how the effect of social-distancing policies changes as voluntary social distancing wanes during later stages of a pandemic.

摘要

目的

虽然有传闻证据表明 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的社交距离政策有效,但仍需确定其与公众意识和自愿行动所驱动的效果之间的关系。我们评估了美国实施的 6 种最常见的社交距离政策(全州范围的居家令、有限居家令、非必要商业关闭、禁止大型集会、学校关闭命令和限制餐馆和酒吧营业)在大流行早期的有效性。

方法

我们应用了差异法和事件研究法,评估了 6 种社交距离政策对谷歌发布的按州汇总的、匿名的每日位置数据的影响,这些数据显示了 2020 年 2 月 15 日至 4 月 25 日期间 6 个位置类别(零售和娱乐、杂货店和药店、公园、交通站、工作场所和住所)中各州的随时间推移的移动趋势。我们比较了在实施 COVID-19 相关政策的州与未实施此类政策的州的兴趣结果,比较的时间是政策实施前后。

结果

全州范围的居家令对减少户外活动的影响最大,使人们在政策实施后的居家时间估计增加了 2.5 个百分点(15.2%)。限制餐馆和酒吧营业排名第二,使在家中的时间估计增加了 1.4 个百分点(8.5%)。其他 4 项政策并没有显著减少流动性。

结论

全州范围的居家令和限制酒吧和餐馆营业与 COVID-19 大流行早期的流动性减少最为相关,而其他此类政策的潜在好处可能已经通过自愿的社交距离措施获得。需要进一步研究,以了解随着大流行后期自愿社交距离的减少,社交距离政策的效果如何变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d9/8093844/97f7bf66de23/10.1177_0033354920976575-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验