Department of Pediatric Oncology, Kanchi Kamakoti CHILDS Trust Hospital, The CHILDS Trust Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Indian J Cancer. 2021 Apr-Jun;58(2):185-189. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_808_18.
Early diagnosis of sepsis in children with febrile neutropenia remains difficult owing to non-specific clinical and laboratory signs of infection. There is a need to assess the utility of inflammatory markers in clinical risk assessment for their ability to discriminate between low-risk and high-risk neutropenic patients since presently there is insufficient data to recommend their routine use.
This is a prospective study of children on therapy admitted with febrile neutropenia and sampled for serum procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) at admission. The febrile neutropenia episodes were categorized into two groups - Group I: no focus of infection and Group II: clinically/microbiologically documented infection. Statistical analyses for comparison were performed using Z-test and receiver operating curves at various cut-off levels.
A total of 46 episodes of febrile neutropenia in 33 children were analyzed. In total, 76% were categorized as group I and 24% as group II. The mean value of PCT in group II was higher (28.07 ng/mL) than group I (1.03 ng/mL) though there was no significant statistical difference. At a cut-off level of 2 ng/mL for PCT, sensitivity of 63%, specificity of 91%, positive predictive values (PPV) of 70%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88% were observed. There was no significant difference in the IL-6 and IL-8 levels between both the groups. However, at an optimal cut-off value of 50 pg/mL, IL-6 had an NPV of 80% and at a cut-off level of 130 pg/mL, IL-8 had an NPV of 73%, however, with low sensitivity and specificity.
IL-6, IL-8, and PCT can be utilized to define a group of patients with a low risk of sepsis in view of their favorable NPV. The use of these biomarkers together can facilitate early discharge from the hospital, and the use of oral antimicrobial therapy, in turn, reducing the cost of supportive therapy in a developing country.
由于感染的非特异性临床和实验室征象,儿童中性粒细胞减少伴发热性脓毒症的早期诊断仍然较为困难。需要评估炎症标志物在临床风险评估中的效用,以判断其是否能够区分低危和高危中性粒细胞减少症患者,因为目前还没有足够的数据推荐常规使用这些标志物。
这是一项前瞻性研究,纳入了接受治疗的伴有发热性中性粒细胞减少症的患儿,在入院时采集血清降钙素原(PCT)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和白细胞介素-8(IL-8)。将发热性中性粒细胞减少症发作分为两组:I 组:无感染灶,II 组:临床/微生物学确诊感染。使用 Z 检验和不同截断值的受试者工作特征曲线进行比较分析。
共分析了 33 例儿童 46 次发热性中性粒细胞减少症发作。总体而言,76%的患儿归为 I 组,24%的患儿归为 II 组。II 组的 PCT 平均值(28.07ng/mL)高于 I 组(1.03ng/mL),但差异无统计学意义。当 PCT 的截断值为 2ng/mL 时,其灵敏度为 63%,特异性为 91%,阳性预测值(PPV)为 70%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 88%。两组患儿的 IL-6 和 IL-8 水平无显著差异。然而,当 IL-6 的最佳截断值为 50pg/mL 时,其 NPV 为 80%,当 IL-8 的截断值为 130pg/mL 时,其 NPV 为 73%,但其灵敏度和特异性均较低。
鉴于其良好的 NPV,IL-6、IL-8 和 PCT 可用于确定一组发生脓毒症风险较低的患者。联合使用这些生物标志物可促进患者早日出院,转而使用口服抗菌治疗,从而降低发展中国家的支持治疗成本。