Ginanneschi A, Degl'Innocenti F, Magnolfi S, Maurello M T, Catarzi L, Marini P, Amaducci L
Department of Neurology, University of Florence, Italy.
Neuroepidemiology. 1988;7(1):38-41. doi: 10.1159/000110159.
We studied the three most commonly used rating scales in Parkinson's Disease (Hoehn and Yahr Clinical Staging, Webster Rating Scale, Columbia University Rating Scale) in order to examine the agreement between observers. Six neurologists, experts at using such scales, evaluated 48 patients suffering from the idiopathic form of Parkinson's Disease. Reliability using the K index was moderate, although a slight superiority was found with the Columbia University Rating Scale. Analysis of the various items used has suggested that scales of disability could be a valid alternative to those examined.
我们研究了帕金森病中最常用的三种评定量表(霍恩和亚尔临床分期、韦伯斯特评定量表、哥伦比亚大学评定量表),以检验观察者之间的一致性。六位使用此类量表的神经科专家对48例特发性帕金森病患者进行了评估。使用K指数得出的可靠性为中等,不过哥伦比亚大学评定量表显示出稍许优势。对所使用的各个项目的分析表明,残疾量表可能是所研究量表的有效替代方案。