Truong Rachel D, Kostick Nathan, Vu David, Chen Lily Y, Cheung Elliott, Dexter Nadine
Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, USA.
Cureus. 2020 Nov 27;12(11):e11730. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11730.
Aims Free healthcare clinics provide highly necessary services for the populations they serve, particularly in rural, low socioeconomic areas. When assessing for quality of clinic performance, it is important to consider the background of the population it serves in addition to observations given by clinic volunteers. Contextualizing the healthcare challenges patients face will help the clinic assist them to a greater capacity. Here, we assess how different areas of clinic operations (service, safety, accessibility, interactions with volunteers, and wait time) impact patient satisfaction in the setting of a small, rural, free clinic. Methods Eligible participants were asked to fill out an anonymous, 21-question survey that assessed their experiences and perspectives on various aspects of the clinic. The study was single-blinded with clinic staff unaware of the nature of the study. Results Thirty-five patients responded to the survey. Overall, patients were extremely satisfied with the clinic with an average Likert score of 4.8/5; 14 of 15 categories scored a four or higher. Wait time scored lowest (3.6/5), with waits up to eight hours. Additionally, we found that transportation was not a major barrier to patients, with 80% arriving by personal transport. Conclusions The clinic provided valued and satisfactory services without coming across as discriminatory to the community. Areas of improvement include wait times, role clarification, and better integration of medical students. Additional studies to further understand the community will facilitate tailoring healthcare to a rural underserved population in the Southeastern United States.
目的 免费医疗诊所为其所服务的人群提供了极为必要的服务,尤其是在农村、社会经济地位较低的地区。在评估诊所的服务质量时,除了考虑诊所志愿者的观察结果外,还需考虑其所服务人群的背景。了解患者面临的医疗挑战将有助于诊所更好地为他们提供帮助。在此,我们评估了诊所运营的不同方面(服务、安全、可及性、与志愿者的互动以及等待时间)如何影响一家小型农村免费诊所患者的满意度。
方法 符合条件的参与者被要求填写一份包含21个问题的匿名调查问卷,该问卷评估了他们对诊所各个方面的体验和看法。该研究采用单盲法,诊所工作人员并不知晓研究的性质。
结果 35名患者对调查做出了回应。总体而言,患者对诊所极为满意,平均李克特评分为4.8/5;15个类别中有14个类别得分达到4分或更高。等待时间得分最低(3.6/5),等待时间长达8小时。此外,我们发现交通对患者来说并不是一个主要障碍,80%的患者是乘坐私人交通工具前来的。
结论 该诊所提供了有价值且令人满意的服务,没有给社区留下歧视的印象。有待改进的方面包括等待时间、职责明确以及更好地整合医学生。进一步了解该社区的其他研究将有助于为美国东南部农村地区未得到充分服务的人群量身定制医疗服务。