• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《学前儿童情感检查表》的信度与效度

Reliability and Validity of Preschool Feelings Checklist.

作者信息

Silver Jamilah, Olino Thomas M, Luby Joan, Hawes Mariah H, Carlson Gabrielle A, Klein Daniel N

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2021 Mar;49(3):367-379. doi: 10.1007/s10802-020-00746-0. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10802-020-00746-0
PMID:33403492
Abstract

The Preschool Feelings Checklist (PFC) is a 16-item parent report measure of depressive symptoms in young children. However, data on its reliability and validity are limited. We examined the internal consistency and convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of the PFC in an unselected community sample of 490 3-year old children. Child psychopathology was assessed using semi-structured diagnostic interviews conducted with a parent at ages 3 and 6 (the Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment) and with the child and a parent at ages 9, 12, and 15 (the Kiddie Schedule for the Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, Present and Lifetime Version). The PFC exhibited good internal consistency. It was concurrently associated with depression, as well as a wide range of other psychiatric disorders and functional impairment. Similarly, the PFC at 3 years independently predicted depression and a range of other disorders and global functioning in subsequent assessments later in childhood and in adolescence. Finally, the PFC outperformed the longer Child Behavior Checklist in predicting diagnoses and functioning. Results support the concurrent and predictive validity of the PFC in preschoolers. However, it also exhibited concurrent and predictive associations with a number of other disorders, suggesting that it indexes a broad transdiagnostic liability for psychopathology and impairment.

摘要

学前情感检查表(PFC)是一份由家长报告的、用于测量幼儿抑郁症状的包含16个条目的量表。然而,关于其信度和效度的数据有限。我们在一个由490名3岁儿童组成的未经过筛选的社区样本中,检验了PFC的内部一致性以及聚合效度、区分效度和预测效度。儿童精神病理学通过在3岁和6岁时与家长进行的半结构化诊断访谈(学前儿童精神评估)以及在9岁、12岁和15岁时与儿童及其家长进行的访谈(情感障碍和精神分裂症儿童检查表,当前和终生版本)来评估。PFC表现出良好的内部一致性。它与抑郁症以及一系列其他精神障碍和功能损害同时相关。同样,3岁时的PFC能够独立预测在儿童期后期和青少年期后续评估中的抑郁症以及一系列其他障碍和整体功能。最后,在预测诊断和功能方面,PFC的表现优于更长的儿童行为检查表。结果支持了PFC在学龄前儿童中的同时效度和预测效度。然而,它也与许多其他障碍表现出同时性和预测性关联,这表明它为精神病理学和损害索引了一种广泛的跨诊断易感性。

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of Preschool Feelings Checklist.《学前儿童情感检查表》的信度与效度
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2021 Mar;49(3):367-379. doi: 10.1007/s10802-020-00746-0. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].[儿童和青少年精神病学中的诊断性结构化访谈]
Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95422-x.
3
ThePreschool Feelings Checklist: a brief and sensitive screening measure for depression in young children.《学前儿童情绪检查表》:一种针对幼儿抑郁症的简短且灵敏的筛查工具。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;43(6):708-17. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000121066.29744.08.
4
A Brief Early Childhood Screening Tool for Psychopathology Risk in Primary Care: The Moderating Role of Poverty.一种用于初级保健中心精神病理学风险的简要早期儿童筛查工具:贫困的调节作用。
J Pediatr. 2021 Sep;236:164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.04.042. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
5
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the kiddie-schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia-present and lifetime version DSM-5 (K-SADS-PL-C DSM-5).中文版本的儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症谱系及诊断与统计手册-5 现行版(K-SADS-PL-C DSM-5)的可靠性和有效性。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 15;317:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.062. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
6
Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children (K-SADS-PL) for the assessment of preschool children--a preliminary psychometric study.用于学龄前儿童评估的学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表(K-SADS-PL)——一项初步心理测量学研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2009 Apr;43(7):680-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
7
The reliability and validity of Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version- Korean version (K-SADS-PL-K).儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表-目前及终生版-韩语版(K-SADS-PL-K)的信度和效度。
Yonsei Med J. 2004 Feb 29;45(1):81-9. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.1.81.
8
Psychometric Properties and Factor Structures of the Korean Version of Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised.儿童抑郁评定量表修订版韩文版的心理测量特性与因子结构
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018 May;28(4):285-292. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0183. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
9
Navigating young minds: reliability and validity of the Greek version of kiddie - schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia - present and lifetime DSM-5 version (K-SADS-PL-GR-5).少年心境导航:希腊版儿童心境障碍与精神分裂症谱系及诊断与统计手册-第五版现用及终身版定式访谈(K-SADS-PL-GR-5)的信度和效度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 22;23(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05076-1.
10
Convergent and divergent validity of the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children - present and lifetime version diagnoses in a sample of children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder.学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症评定量表的聚合效度和区分效度——针对患有强迫症的儿童和青少年样本的当前及终生版本诊断
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;73(2):111-117. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1571628. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Dimensions of Depressive Symptoms in Young Children: Factor Analysis of the Preschool Feelings Checklist-Scale.幼儿抑郁症状的维度:学前情感检查表量表的因素分析
Assessment. 2025 Jun;32(4):544-560. doi: 10.1177/10731911241256443. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
Measurement-Based Care for Depression in Youth: Practical Considerations for Selecting Measures to Assess Depression, Associated Features and Functioning.青少年抑郁症的基于测量的护理:选择评估抑郁症、相关特征和功能的测量方法的实际考量
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Jan 13. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01652-4.
3
Associations between pre-pandemic authoritative parenting, pandemic stressors, and children's depression and anxiety at the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Continuity and stability of preschool depression from childhood through adolescence and following the onset of puberty.学龄前抑郁症从儿童期持续到青春期,并延续至青春期开始后。
Compr Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;86:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
2
Amygdala Reward Reactivity Mediates the Association Between Preschool Stress Response and Depression Severity.杏仁核奖赏反应中介了学前压力反应与抑郁严重程度之间的关系。
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 15;83(2):128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
3
Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in preschoolers.
新冠大流行初期亲权权威、大流行应激源与儿童抑郁焦虑的关系。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 20;13(1):15592. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42268-x.
4
A Brief Early Childhood Screening Tool for Psychopathology Risk in Primary Care: The Moderating Role of Poverty.一种用于初级保健中心精神病理学风险的简要早期儿童筛查工具:贫困的调节作用。
J Pediatr. 2021 Sep;236:164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.04.042. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
学龄前儿童精神障碍的患病率。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;53(6):695-705. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02514.x. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
4
Parent-reported mental health in preschoolers: findings using a diagnostic interview.家长报告的学龄前儿童心理健康:使用诊断访谈的研究结果。
Compr Psychiatry. 2011 Jul-Aug;52(4):359-69. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
5
How common are common mental disorders? Evidence that lifetime prevalence rates are doubled by prospective versus retrospective ascertainment.常见精神障碍的发病率有多高?前瞻性与回顾性研究相比,前者发现的终身患病率增加了一倍。
Psychol Med. 2010 Jun;40(6):899-909. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991036. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
6
Preschool depression: homotypic continuity and course over 24 months.学龄前儿童抑郁症:同型连续性及24个月的病程
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;66(8):897-905. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.97.
7
Depression and social functioning in preschool children with chronic medical conditions.患有慢性疾病的学龄前儿童的抑郁与社会功能
J Pediatr. 2008 Sep;153(3):408-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.03.035. Epub 2008 May 23.
8
The clinical significance of preschool depression: impairment in functioning and clinical markers of the disorder.学龄前抑郁的临床意义:功能损害及该障碍的临床标志物。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jan;112(1-3):111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.026. Epub 2008 May 16.
9
Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r.随访研究中的效应量比较:ROC曲线下面积、科恩d值和r值。
Law Hum Behav. 2005 Oct;29(5):615-20. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7.
10
Agreement between telephone and in-person delivery of a structured interview for anxiety disorders in children.针对儿童焦虑症的结构化访谈,电话访谈与现场访谈结果的一致性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;44(3):274-82. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200503000-00012.