Boydell Victoria, Smith Robert Dean
School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester Campus, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Department of Anthropology and Sociology, Geneva Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 18;3(8):e0002131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002131. eCollection 2023.
In recent years there has been extensive promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) globally to increase access to what is widely considered a highly effective contraceptive method. Yet, despite these efforts, evidence points towards the worrying propensity for LARCS to be associated with coercion. Hence, we undertook a meta-narrative review across nine databases to draw together the heterogeneous and complex evidence on the coercive practices associated with LARC programs. A total of 92 papers were grouped into three metanarratives: (1) law, (2) public health and medicine, and (3) the social sciences. Across disciplines, the evidence supports the conclusion that coercive practices surrounding LARC programs always target marginalized, disadvantaged and excluded population(s). Looking at coercion across disciplines reveals its many forms, and we present a continuum of coercive practices associated with LARC programming. We found that each discipline provides only a partial picture of coercion, and this fragmentation is a knowledge practice that prevents us from collecting accurate information on this subject and may contribute to the perpetuation of these suspect practices. We present this review to address longstanding silences around coercion and LARCs, and to encourage the development of clinical and programmatic guidance to actively safeguard against coercion and uphold reproductive rights and justice.
近年来,长效可逆避孕药(LARC)在全球范围内得到了广泛推广,以增加人们获得这种被广泛认为是高效避孕方法的途径。然而,尽管做出了这些努力,但有证据表明,长效可逆避孕药存在令人担忧的被用于强制手段的倾向。因此,我们对九个数据库进行了元叙事综述,以汇总有关长效可逆避孕药项目相关强制行为的异质性和复杂证据。总共92篇论文被归为三个元叙事:(1)法律,(2)公共卫生与医学,以及(3)社会科学。跨学科来看,证据支持这样的结论,即围绕长效可逆避孕药项目的强制行为总是针对边缘化、弱势和被排斥的人群。审视跨学科的强制行为会发现其多种形式,我们展示了与长效可逆避孕药项目相关的一系列连续的强制行为。我们发现,每个学科对强制行为的描述都只是片面的,这种碎片化是一种知识现象,它阻碍我们收集有关这一主题的准确信息,并且可能导致这些可疑行为的持续存在。我们进行此次综述是为了消除围绕强制行为和长效可逆避孕药的长期沉默,并鼓励制定临床和项目指导方针,以积极防范强制行为,维护生殖权利和正义。