Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.
Memory. 2021 Feb;29(2):180-192. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1871024. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
How does memory for the public past differ from memory for the personal past? Across five experiments ( = 457), we found that memories of the personal past were characterised by a positivity bias, whereas memories of the public past were characterised by a negativity bias. This valence-based dissociation emerged regardless of how far back participants recounted the personal and public past, whether or not participants were asked to think about significant events, how much time participants were given to retrieve relevant personal and public memories, and also generalised across various demographic categories, including gender, age, and political affiliation. Along with recent work demonstrating a similar dissociation in the context of future thinking, our findings suggest that personal and public event cognition fundamentally differ in terms of access to emotionally salient events. Direct comparisons between personal and public event memory should represent a fruitful avenue for research on event cognition.
公众过去的记忆与个人过去的记忆有何不同?在五项实验中( = 457),我们发现个人过去的记忆具有正性偏差,而公众过去的记忆则具有负性偏差。这种基于效价的分离无论参与者回忆个人和公共过去的时间长短,无论是否要求参与者思考重要事件,无论参与者有多少时间检索相关的个人和公共记忆,以及是否跨越了各种人口统计学类别,包括性别、年龄和政治派别,都表现出来。与最近在未来思维背景下证明类似分离的工作一样,我们的发现表明,个人和公共事件认知在情感相关事件的获取方面存在根本差异。个人和公共事件记忆之间的直接比较应该是事件认知研究的一个有成效的途径。