Department of Physical Education, Health and Recreation, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana. Email:
Department of Statistics, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2020 Nov-Dec;31(6):314-318. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2020-025.
To date, no definitive waist circumference (WC) cut-off values for abdominal obesity (AO) have been established for sub-Saharan Africa, including Botswana. Therefore, the classification of AO among these populations is based on European values. For accurate diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome (MetS), cut-off values reflective of the population investigated must be used.
The study was an attempt to determine optimal cut-off values for AO among Batswana adults.
The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off values for predicting at least two other risk factors of the MetS. Data were used from a descriptive cross-sectional study employing a complex multi-stage cluster sampling. Demographic and anthropometric measurements (weight and height, waist and hip circumferences), blood pressure, and blood glucose, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol levels were collected from 384 men and 416 women in Gaborone and the surrounding villages.
The ability of waist circumference to predict at least two other risk factors of the MetS gave cut-off values of ≥ 91.0 cm (sensitivity 69.1% and specificity of 90.8%, area under the curve 0.85) for men and ≥ 82.3 cm (sensitivity of 88.6% and specificity of 58.9%, area under the curve of 0.76) for women.
There is a difference between the cut-off values for Europeans with those determined for Batswana adults. Inconsistencies in cut-off values used have the potential for undesirable consequences for cardiovascular risk stratification and prioritisation of preventative strategies for AO and the MetS. The need to determine population-, ethnic- and gender-based cut-off values for AO for Batswana adults has never been more paramount.
迄今为止,包括博茨瓦纳在内的撒哈拉以南非洲地区尚未确定腹部肥胖(AO)的明确腰围(WC)截断值。因此,这些人群的 AO 分类是基于欧洲人的数值。为了准确诊断代谢综合征(MetS),必须使用反映研究人群的截断值。
本研究试图确定博茨瓦纳成年人中 AO 的最佳截断值。
采用受试者工作特征曲线确定预测 MetS 至少另外两个危险因素的最佳截断值。该数据来自一项描述性横断面研究,采用复杂的多阶段聚类抽样。从 384 名男性和 416 名女性中收集了人口统计学和人体测量学测量值(体重和身高、腰围和臀围)、血压以及血糖、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和总胆固醇水平,这些人来自哈博罗内及其周边村庄。
腰围预测 MetS 至少另外两个危险因素的能力给出了以下截断值:男性≥91.0cm(敏感性 69.1%,特异性 90.8%,曲线下面积 0.85),女性≥82.3cm(敏感性 88.6%,特异性 58.9%,曲线下面积 0.76)。
欧洲人的截断值与博茨瓦纳成年人的截断值不同。使用不一致的截断值可能会对心血管风险分层和 AO 及 MetS 的预防策略的优先级产生不利影响。确定博茨瓦纳成年人基于人群、种族和性别的 AO 截断值的需求从未如此重要。