• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国皮肤科住院医师皮肤科镜检查能力期望:色素病变专家改良 Delphi 调查结果。

Dermoscopy Proficiency Expectations for US Dermatology Resident Physicians: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey of Pigmented Lesion Experts.

机构信息

The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.

Department of Dermatology and Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Feb 1;157(2):189-197. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5213.

DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5213
PMID:33404623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7788510/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Dermoscopy education in US dermatology residency programs varies widely, and there is currently no existing expert consensus identifying what is most important for resident physicians to know.

OBJECTIVES

To identify consensus-based learning constructs representing an appropriate foundational proficiency in dermoscopic image interpretation for dermatology resident physicians, including dermoscopic diagnoses, associated features, and representative teaching images. Defining these foundational proficiency learning constructs will facilitate further skill development in dermoscopic image interpretation to help residents achieve clinical proficiency.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 2-phase modified Delphi surveying technique was used to identify resident learning constructs in 3 sequential sets of surveys-diagnoses, features, and images. Expert panelists were recruited through an email distributed to the 32 members of the Pigmented Lesion Subcommittee of the Melanoma Prevention Working Group. Twenty-six (81%) opted to participate. Surveys were distributed using RedCAP software.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Consensus on diagnoses, associated dermoscopic features, and representative teaching images reflective of a foundational proficiency in dermoscopic image interpretation for US dermatology resident physicians.

RESULTS

Twenty-six pigmented lesion and dermoscopy specialists completed 8 rounds of surveys, with 100% (26/26) response rate in all rounds. A final list of 32 diagnoses and 116 associated dermoscopic features was generated. Three hundred seventy-eight representative teaching images reached consensus with panelists.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Consensus achieved in this modified Delphi process identified common dermoscopic diagnoses, associated features, and representative teaching images reflective of a foundational proficiency in dermoscopic image interpretation for dermatology residency training. This list of validated objectives provides a consensus-based foundation of key learning points in dermoscopy to help resident physicians achieve clinical proficiency in dermoscopic image interpretation.

摘要

重要性

美国皮肤科住院医师培训计划中的皮肤镜教学差异很大,目前尚无现有专家共识确定住院医师最需要了解哪些内容。

目的

确定基于共识的学习结构,代表皮肤科住院医师进行皮肤镜图像解释的适当基础能力,包括皮肤镜诊断、相关特征和代表性教学图像。定义这些基础能力学习结构将有助于进一步发展皮肤镜图像解释技能,帮助住院医师达到临床熟练程度。

设计、设置和参与者:使用 2 阶段改良 Delphi 调查技术,在 3 个连续的调查系列中确定住院医师的学习结构-诊断、特征和图像。通过向黑色素瘤预防工作组色素性病变小组委员会的 32 名成员发送电子邮件来招募专家小组成员。26 人(81%)选择参与。使用 RedCAP 软件分发调查。

主要结果和措施

对诊断、相关皮肤镜特征和代表美国皮肤科住院医师皮肤镜图像解释基础能力的教学图像达成共识。

结果

26 名色素性病变和皮肤镜专家完成了 8 轮调查,所有轮次的回复率均为 100%(26/26)。最终生成了 32 个诊断和 116 个相关皮肤镜特征列表。与小组成员达成共识的 378 张代表性教学图像。

结论和相关性

在这项改良 Delphi 过程中达成的共识确定了常见的皮肤镜诊断、相关特征和代表性教学图像,反映了皮肤科住院医师培训中皮肤镜图像解释的基础能力。这份经过验证的目标清单提供了皮肤镜中关键学习要点的基于共识的基础,有助于住院医师在皮肤镜图像解释方面达到临床熟练程度。

相似文献

1
Dermoscopy Proficiency Expectations for US Dermatology Resident Physicians: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey of Pigmented Lesion Experts.美国皮肤科住院医师皮肤科镜检查能力期望:色素病变专家改良 Delphi 调查结果。
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Feb 1;157(2):189-197. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5213.
2
Expert Consensus Statement on Proficiency Standards for Dermoscopy Education in Primary Care.《初级保健中皮肤镜检查教育熟练标准专家共识声明》
J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Feb 8;36(1):25-38. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220143R1.
3
Standardization of dermoscopic terminology and basic dermoscopic parameters to evaluate in general dermatology (non-neoplastic dermatoses): an expert consensus on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society.用于普通皮肤科(非肿瘤性皮肤病)评估的皮肤镜术语和基本皮肤镜参数标准化:代表国际皮肤镜协会的专家共识
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Feb;182(2):454-467. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18125. Epub 2019 Jul 28.
4
A short dermoscopy training increases diagnostic performance in both inexperienced and experienced dermatologists.简短的皮肤镜检查培训可提高经验不足和经验丰富的皮肤科医生的诊断能力。
Australas J Dermatol. 2015 Feb;56(1):52-5. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12203. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
5
Understanding visual search patterns of dermatologists assessing pigmented skin lesions before and after online training.了解皮肤科医生在在线培训前后评估色素沉着性皮肤病变时的视觉搜索模式。
J Digit Imaging. 2014 Dec;27(6):779-85. doi: 10.1007/s10278-014-9712-1.
6
The influence of training on the recognition of gross features of dermoscopy images.训练对皮肤镜图像大体特征识别的影响。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2010 Mar-Apr;76(2):132-7. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.60550.
7
International Dermoscopy Society criteria for non-neoplastic dermatoses (general dermatology): validation for skin of color through a Delphi expert consensus.国际皮肤镜学会非肿瘤性皮肤病(普通皮肤科)标准:通过德尔菲专家共识对有色人种皮肤进行验证
Int J Dermatol. 2022 Apr;61(4):461-471. doi: 10.1111/ijd.15729. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
8
Top DEI Topics to Incorporate Into Dermatology Residency Training: An Electronic Delphi Consensus Study.将多样性、公平性和包容性主题纳入皮肤科住院医师培训的最佳实践:一项电子德尔菲共识研究。
Cutis. 2024 Sep;114(3):72-75. doi: 10.12788/cutis.1090.
9
Use of and beliefs about dermoscopy in the management of patients with pigmented lesions: a survey of dermatology residency programmes in the United States.色素沉着性皮损患者管理中皮肤镜的使用情况及相关认知:一项对美国皮肤科住院医师培训项目的调查
Melanoma Res. 2002 Dec;12(6):601-5. doi: 10.1097/00008390-200212000-00010.
10
Smartphone wallpapers for dermoscopy training in medical students and residents.智能手机壁纸在医学生和住院医师皮肤镜检查培训中的应用。
Int J Dermatol. 2019 Mar;58(3):345-349. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14338. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Skin Cancer Diagnosis by Lesion, Physician, and Examination Type: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于病变、医生及检查类型的皮肤癌诊断:一项系统评价与Meta分析
JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Feb 1;161(2):135-146. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4382.
2
The Accuracy of Skin Cancer Detection Rates with the Implementation of Dermoscopy Among Dermatology Clinicians: A Scoping Review.皮肤科临床医生实施皮肤镜检查后皮肤癌检出率的准确性:一项范围综述
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2024 Sep-Oct;17(9-10 Suppl 1):S18-S27.
3
Lessons learned from the Dermoscopy Bowl for dermatology residents.皮肤科住院医师从皮肤镜竞赛中学到的经验教训。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Sep 26;316(9):643. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03400-7.
4
The Impact of Melanoma Imaging Biomarker Cues on Detection Sensitivity and Specificity in Melanoma versus Clinically Atypical Nevi.黑色素瘤成像生物标志物线索对黑色素瘤与临床非典型痣检测敏感性和特异性的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 4;16(17):3077. doi: 10.3390/cancers16173077.
5
Dynamic optical coherence tomography unveils subclinical, vascular differences across actinic keratosis grades I-III.动态光学相干断层扫描揭示了 I-III 级光化性角化病各等级的亚临床血管差异。
Exp Dermatol. 2024 Aug;33(8):e15153. doi: 10.1111/exd.15153.
6
Review of the application of the most current sophisticated image processing methods for the skin cancer diagnostics purposes.当前最先进的图像处理方法在皮肤癌诊断中的应用综述。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Mar 6;316(4):99. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-02828-1.
7
Dermoscopy Training in Family Medicine Residencies: A CERA Survey of Program Directors.家庭医学住院医师皮肤科镜检查培训:CERA 对项目主任的调查。
Fam Med. 2023 Apr;55(4):259-262. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2023.368813. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
8
Expert Consensus Statement on Proficiency Standards for Dermoscopy Education in Primary Care.《初级保健中皮肤镜检查教育熟练标准专家共识声明》
J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Feb 8;36(1):25-38. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220143R1.
9
Educational Interventions to Support Primary Care Provider Performance of Diagnostic Skin Cancer Examinations: A Systematic Literature Review.教育干预措施以支持初级保健提供者进行皮肤癌诊断检查:系统文献回顾。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Dec;37(6):1579-1588. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02118-8. Epub 2022 Jan 18.