Suppr超能文献

国际皮肤镜学会非肿瘤性皮肤病(普通皮肤科)标准:通过德尔菲专家共识对有色人种皮肤进行验证

International Dermoscopy Society criteria for non-neoplastic dermatoses (general dermatology): validation for skin of color through a Delphi expert consensus.

作者信息

Errichetti Enzo, Ankad Balachandra S, Jha Abhijeet K, Sonthalia Sidharth, Akay Bengu N, Bakos Roberto, Bhat Yasmeen J, Bosseila Manal, Braun Ralph, Cabo Horacio, Cohen Sabban Emilia N, Chatterjee Manas, Daneshpazhooh Maryam, Jakhar Deepak, Kaliyadan Feroze, Kelati Awatef, Keshavamurthy Vinay, Neema Shekhar, Sadek Ahmed, Salerni Gabriel, Swanson David L, Tejasvi Trilokraj, Usatine Richard, Lallas Aimilios

机构信息

Institute of Dermatology, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital, Udine, Italy.

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, SN Medical College, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Int J Dermatol. 2022 Apr;61(4):461-471. doi: 10.1111/ijd.15729. Epub 2021 Jul 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Dermoscopy Society (IDS) recently released a set of five basic dermoscopic parameters (vessels, scales, follicular findings, "other structures," and specific clues) encompassing a total of 31 subitems to standardize the use of dermoscopy in non-neoplastic dermatoses, yet they have been developed taking into account Caucasian/Asian skin, with consequent possible limitations if used in dark skin.

OBJECTIVES

To validate the abovementioned criteria for the use in dark-skinned patients (phototypes IV-VI) through an expert consensus.

METHODS

The two-round Delphi method was adopted, with an iterative process consisting of two rounds of email questionnaires. Potential panelists were recruited via e-mail from all over the world based on their expertise on dermoscopy of non-neoplastic dermatoses in skin of color.

RESULTS

Twenty-two panelists took part in the validation process. All of the five originally proposed parameters and subitems reached agreement during the first round, aside from "follicular red dots." Additionally, during round 1, five new subitems were proposed (perifollicular scales distribution, follicular openings obliteration, broken hairs, eccrine pigmentation, and eccrine ostia obliteration), along with the possibility to change the denomination of parameter 3 (from "follicular findings" to "follicular/eccrine findings") and split it into two subparameters ("follicular findings" and "eccrine findings"). All such proposals reached agreement during the second round and therefore were included in the final list, for a total of 37 items.

CONCLUSIONS

Although nearly all the dermoscopic criteria originally proposed by the IDS are applicable even to darker phototypes, several additional variables need to be assessed.

摘要

背景

国际皮肤镜协会(IDS)最近发布了一组五个基本皮肤镜参数(血管、鳞屑、毛囊表现、“其他结构”和特定线索),共包含31个分项,以规范皮肤镜在非肿瘤性皮肤病中的应用。然而,这些参数是在考虑白种人/亚洲人皮肤的情况下制定的,因此在深色皮肤中使用时可能存在局限性。

目的

通过专家共识验证上述标准在深色皮肤患者(皮肤光类型IV - VI)中的应用。

方法

采用两轮德尔菲法,通过两轮电子邮件问卷进行迭代过程。根据全球范围内对有色人种非肿瘤性皮肤病皮肤镜检查的专业知识,通过电子邮件招募潜在的专家小组成员。

结果

22名专家小组成员参与了验证过程。除了“毛囊红点”外,最初提出的所有五个参数和分项在第一轮中均达成了一致。此外,在第一轮中,还提出了五个新的分项(毛囊周围鳞屑分布、毛囊开口闭塞、断发、汗腺色素沉着和汗腺开口闭塞),同时有可能更改参数3 的名称(从“毛囊表现”改为“毛囊/汗腺表现”)并将其分为两个子参数(“毛囊表现”和“汗腺表现”)。所有这些提议在第二轮中均达成一致,因此被纳入最终列表,共计37项。

结论

尽管IDS最初提出的几乎所有皮肤镜标准甚至适用于更深的皮肤光类型,但仍需要评估几个额外的变量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验