Errichetti E, Zalaudek I, Kittler H, Apalla Z, Argenziano G, Bakos R, Blum A, Braun R P, Ioannides D, Lacarrubba F, Lazaridou E, Longo C, Micali G, Moscarella E, Paoli J, Papageorgiou C, Russo T, Scope A, Stinco G, Thomas L, Toncic R J, Tschandl P, Cabo H, Hallpern A, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Malvehy J, Marghoob A, Menzies S, Pellacani G, Puig S, Rabinovitz H, Rudnicka L, Vakirlis E, Soyer P, Stolz W, Tanaka M, Lallas A
Institute of Dermatology, 'Santa Maria della Misericordia' University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Feb;182(2):454-467. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18125. Epub 2019 Jul 28.
Over the last few years, several articles on dermoscopy of non-neoplastic dermatoses have been published, yet there is poor consistency in the terminology among different studies.
We aimed to standardize the dermoscopic terminology and identify basic parameters to evaluate in non-neoplastic dermatoses through an expert consensus.
The modified Delphi method was followed, with two phases: (i) identification of a list of possible items based on a systematic literature review and (ii) selection of parameters by a panel of experts through a three-step iterative procedure (blinded e-mail interaction in rounds 1 and 3 and a face-to-face meeting in round 2). Initial panellists were recruited via e-mail from all over the world based on their expertise on dermoscopy of non-neoplastic dermatoses.
Twenty-four international experts took part in all rounds of the consensus and 13 further international participants were also involved in round 2. Five standardized basic parameters were identified: (i) vessels (including morphology and distribution); (ii) scales (including colour and distribution); (iii) follicular findings; (iv) 'other structures' (including colour and morphology); and (v) 'specific clues'. For each of them, possible variables were selected, with a total of 31 different subitems reaching agreement at the end of the consensus (all of the 29 proposed initially plus two more added in the course of the consensus procedure).
This expert consensus provides a set of standardized basic dermoscopic parameters to follow when evaluating inflammatory, infiltrative and infectious dermatoses. This tool, if adopted by clinicians and researchers in this field, is likely to enhance the reproducibility and comparability of existing and future research findings and uniformly expand the universal knowledge on dermoscopy in general dermatology. What's already known about this topic? Over the last few years, several papers have been published attempting to describe the dermoscopic features of non-neoplastic dermatoses, yet there is poor consistency in the terminology among different studies. What does this study add? The present expert consensus provides a set of standardized basic dermoscopic parameters to follow when evaluating inflammatory, infiltrative and infectious dermatoses. This consensus should enhance the reproducibility and comparability of existing and future research findings and uniformly expand the universal knowledge on dermoscopy in general dermatology.
在过去几年里,已经发表了几篇关于非肿瘤性皮肤病皮肤镜检查的文章,但不同研究之间的术语一致性较差。
我们旨在通过专家共识来规范皮肤镜检查术语,并确定在非肿瘤性皮肤病中要评估的基本参数。
采用改良的德尔菲法,分为两个阶段:(i)基于系统的文献综述确定一份可能项目的清单;(ii)专家小组通过三步迭代程序(第1轮和第3轮通过盲态电子邮件交互,第2轮进行面对面会议)选择参数。最初的小组成员是根据他们在非肿瘤性皮肤病皮肤镜检查方面的专业知识通过电子邮件从世界各地招募的。
24位国际专家参与了所有轮次的共识,另有13位国际参与者也参与了第2轮。确定了五个标准化的基本参数:(i)血管(包括形态和分布);(ii)鳞屑(包括颜色和分布);(iii)毛囊表现;(iv)“其他结构”(包括颜色和形态);(v)“特定线索”。针对每个参数,选择了可能的变量,在共识结束时共有31个不同的子项目达成一致(最初提出的29个项目全部加上在共识过程中新增的2个项目)。
这一专家共识提供了一套标准化的基本皮肤镜参数,用于评估炎症性、浸润性和感染性皮肤病。如果该领域的临床医生和研究人员采用这个工具,则可能会提高现有及未来研究结果的可重复性和可比性,并统一扩大普通皮肤科中关于皮肤镜检查的普遍知识。关于这个主题已经知道了什么?在过去几年里,已经发表了几篇论文试图描述非肿瘤性皮肤病的皮肤镜特征,但不同研究之间的术语一致性较差。这项研究增加了什么?本专家共识提供了一套标准化的基本皮肤镜参数,用于评估炎症性、浸润性和感染性皮肤病。这一共识应能提高现有及未来研究结果的可重复性和可比性,并统一扩大普通皮肤科中关于皮肤镜检查的普遍知识。