• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Roles and their dynamics in participatory research communities].[参与式研究社区中的角色及其动态关系]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):156-162. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03272-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
Impact and Lessons Learned from a National Consortium for Participatory Health Research: PartKommPlus-German Research Consortium for Healthy Communities (2015-2018).国家参与式健康研究联合会的影响和经验教训:PartKommPlus-德国健康社区研究联合会(2015-2018 年)。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Sep 17;2018:5184316. doi: 10.1155/2018/5184316. eCollection 2018.
3
"What Do You Need? What Are You Experiencing?" Relationship Building and Power Dynamics in Participatory Research Projects: Critical Self-Reflections of Researchers.你需要什么?你正在经历什么?参与式研究项目中的关系构建和权力动态:研究人员的批判性自我反思。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9336. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159336.
4
[Research questions in participatory projects. Critical reflections from the project "Longing in later life"].[参与式项目中的研究问题。来自“晚年的渴望”项目的批判性反思]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Aug;56(5):376-381. doi: 10.1007/s00391-023-02216-w. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
5
Caring communities as collective learning process: findings and lessons learned from a participatory research project in Austria.关爱社区作为集体学习过程:来自奥地利一个参与式研究项目的发现与经验教训
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;7(Suppl 2):S84-S98. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.03.05.
6
[Continuing participatory research beyond the end of projects: participatory quality development in municipal health promotion].[项目结束后仍持续开展的参与式研究:市政健康促进中的参与式质量发展]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03271-z. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
7
[Ethics in participatory research-reflection on challenges and possible impairments for participants].[参与式研究中的伦理——对参与者面临的挑战和可能的损害的反思]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):171-178. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03270-0. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
8
[Participatory health research: origins and current trends].[参与式健康研究:起源与当前趋势]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):140-145. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03264-y. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
9
Building an international collaboration on participatory health research.建立参与式健康研究的国际合作。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010 Spring;4(1):31-6. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0102.
10
A call for an international collaboration on participatory research for health.呼吁开展参与式健康研究国际合作。
Health Promot Int. 2010 Mar;25(1):115-22. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap043. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice.参与式研究的价值与挑战:加强其实践
Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325-50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.091307.083824.

[参与式研究社区中的角色及其动态关系]

[Roles and their dynamics in participatory research communities].

作者信息

Kümpers Susanne, Brandes Sven, Gebhardt Birte, Kühnemund Christina

机构信息

Fachbereich Pflege und Gesundheit, Hochschule Fulda, Leipziger Str. 123, 36037, Fulda, Deutschland.

Landesvereinigung für Gesundheit und Akademie für Sozialmedizin Niedersachsen e. V., Hannover, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):156-162. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03272-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-020-03272-y
PMID:33404663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7843471/
Abstract

The participatory research approach results in changes in roles and relationships for researchers and coresearchers compared to traditional research concepts. In the form of a workshop report, this article describes reflections and findings on the question of how roles are perceived and filled in participatory health research (PHR). Researchers and practitioners from two subprojects in the research consortium PartKommPlus evaluated their experiences from several years of cooperation and developed insights into which dynamics were important for the design of roles and what should be considered for a productive development of roles.Five important elements were identified: the significance of the scope for action resulting from the ties of the participants to their respective institutions; the change of roles and relationships over the course of the project time; the significance of trust for functioning cooperative relationships; the problem of information confidentiality for scientific exploitation; and the political character of the cooperation, which is based on the claim for change of participatory research and which presupposes shared basic attitudes and goals. Finally, the importance of joint reflection on role design, which contributes to the success or failure of participatory research cooperation and the quality of its results, is highlighted.

摘要

与传统研究概念相比,参与式研究方法会导致研究人员和共同研究人员的角色及关系发生变化。本文以研讨会报告的形式,描述了关于在参与式健康研究(PHR)中如何看待和履行角色这一问题的思考与发现。研究联盟PartKommPlus中两个子项目的研究人员和从业者评估了他们多年合作的经验,并深入了解了哪些动态因素对角色设计很重要,以及为了角色的有效发展应考虑哪些因素。确定了五个重要因素:参与者与其各自机构的联系所产生的行动范围的重要性;项目期间角色和关系的变化;信任对合作关系正常运作的重要性;科学利用中的信息保密问题;以及合作的政治性质,这基于参与式研究的变革主张,并且以共同的基本态度和目标为前提。最后,强调了对角色设计进行共同反思的重要性,这有助于参与式研究合作的成败及其结果的质量。