Suppr超能文献

[参与式研究社区中的角色及其动态关系]

[Roles and their dynamics in participatory research communities].

作者信息

Kümpers Susanne, Brandes Sven, Gebhardt Birte, Kühnemund Christina

机构信息

Fachbereich Pflege und Gesundheit, Hochschule Fulda, Leipziger Str. 123, 36037, Fulda, Deutschland.

Landesvereinigung für Gesundheit und Akademie für Sozialmedizin Niedersachsen e. V., Hannover, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):156-162. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03272-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

Abstract

The participatory research approach results in changes in roles and relationships for researchers and coresearchers compared to traditional research concepts. In the form of a workshop report, this article describes reflections and findings on the question of how roles are perceived and filled in participatory health research (PHR). Researchers and practitioners from two subprojects in the research consortium PartKommPlus evaluated their experiences from several years of cooperation and developed insights into which dynamics were important for the design of roles and what should be considered for a productive development of roles.Five important elements were identified: the significance of the scope for action resulting from the ties of the participants to their respective institutions; the change of roles and relationships over the course of the project time; the significance of trust for functioning cooperative relationships; the problem of information confidentiality for scientific exploitation; and the political character of the cooperation, which is based on the claim for change of participatory research and which presupposes shared basic attitudes and goals. Finally, the importance of joint reflection on role design, which contributes to the success or failure of participatory research cooperation and the quality of its results, is highlighted.

摘要

与传统研究概念相比,参与式研究方法会导致研究人员和共同研究人员的角色及关系发生变化。本文以研讨会报告的形式,描述了关于在参与式健康研究(PHR)中如何看待和履行角色这一问题的思考与发现。研究联盟PartKommPlus中两个子项目的研究人员和从业者评估了他们多年合作的经验,并深入了解了哪些动态因素对角色设计很重要,以及为了角色的有效发展应考虑哪些因素。确定了五个重要因素:参与者与其各自机构的联系所产生的行动范围的重要性;项目期间角色和关系的变化;信任对合作关系正常运作的重要性;科学利用中的信息保密问题;以及合作的政治性质,这基于参与式研究的变革主张,并且以共同的基本态度和目标为前提。最后,强调了对角色设计进行共同反思的重要性,这有助于参与式研究合作的成败及其结果的质量。

相似文献

1
[Roles and their dynamics in participatory research communities].[参与式研究社区中的角色及其动态关系]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):156-162. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03272-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
[Ethics in participatory research-reflection on challenges and possible impairments for participants].[参与式研究中的伦理——对参与者面临的挑战和可能的损害的反思]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):171-178. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03270-0. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
8
[Participatory health research: origins and current trends].[参与式健康研究:起源与当前趋势]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):140-145. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03264-y. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
9
Building an international collaboration on participatory health research.建立参与式健康研究的国际合作。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010 Spring;4(1):31-6. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0102.
10
A call for an international collaboration on participatory research for health.呼吁开展参与式健康研究国际合作。
Health Promot Int. 2010 Mar;25(1):115-22. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap043. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice.参与式研究的价值与挑战:加强其实践
Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325-50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.091307.083824.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验