• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[参与式项目中的研究问题。来自“晚年的渴望”项目的批判性反思]

[Research questions in participatory projects. Critical reflections from the project "Longing in later life"].

作者信息

Leontowitsch Miranda, Prömper Hans

机构信息

Interdisziplinäre Alternswissenschaft (IAW), Fachbereich Erziehungswissenschaften, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz, 60629, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.

Universität des 3. Lebensalters Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Aug;56(5):376-381. doi: 10.1007/s00391-023-02216-w. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00391-023-02216-w
PMID:37439852
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A central component of participatory research is the collaborative, nonhierarchical work of co-researchers and academic researchers. The development of a research question has a special importance as it entails different meanings for those involved. For academic researchers the research question is focussed on gaining knowledge and is developed at an early stage of the project. For co-researchers the development and the finding of answers to a question are less important than the possibility of jointly changing their social reality.

OBJECTIVE

This article investigates how these different interests influence the collaborative development of a research question and which factors can enhance the process.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Based on experiences from the participatory action research project "Longing in later life" and critical reflections, this article unpacks the different roles of the participants in the project and the process of co-creation.

CONCLUSION

A joint development of a research question is time consuming and depends on the extent of shared experiences and the degree of marginalization among the group of co-researchers.

摘要

背景

参与式研究的一个核心要素是共同研究者与学术研究者之间协作、非等级制的工作。研究问题的提出具有特殊重要性,因为它对相关人员有着不同的意义。对学术研究者而言,研究问题聚焦于获取知识,且在项目早期阶段就已形成。对共同研究者来说,问题的提出及答案的探寻不如共同改变其社会现实的可能性重要。

目的

本文探讨这些不同的利益如何影响研究问题的协作式提出,以及哪些因素能够促进这一过程。

材料与方法

基于参与式行动研究项目“晚年的渴望”的经验及批判性反思,本文剖析了项目参与者的不同角色以及共同创造的过程。

结论

共同提出研究问题耗时且取决于共同研究者群体中共享经验的程度和边缘化程度。

相似文献

1
[Research questions in participatory projects. Critical reflections from the project "Longing in later life"].[参与式项目中的研究问题。来自“晚年的渴望”项目的批判性反思]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Aug;56(5):376-381. doi: 10.1007/s00391-023-02216-w. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
"What Do You Need? What Are You Experiencing?" Relationship Building and Power Dynamics in Participatory Research Projects: Critical Self-Reflections of Researchers.你需要什么?你正在经历什么?参与式研究项目中的关系构建和权力动态:研究人员的批判性自我反思。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9336. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159336.
3
[Roles and their dynamics in participatory research communities].[参与式研究社区中的角色及其动态关系]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):156-162. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03272-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Practices of Care in Participatory Design With Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Digitally Mediated Study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间与老年人共同设计中的关怀实践:数字化中介研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 17;25:e45750. doi: 10.2196/45750.
5
'Getting our voices heard in research: a review of peer researcher's roles and experiences on a qualitative study of adult safeguarding policy.在研究中让我们的声音被听到:对同伴研究者在成人保护政策定性研究中的角色和经历的综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 28;8(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00403-4.
6
Facilitating co-research: lessons learned from reflection forms within three participatory action research projects.促进共同研究:从三个参与式行动研究项目中的反思表中得到的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 23;22(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01210-x.
7
Peer researchers' experiences of a co-produced research project on supported decision-making.同行研究人员参与共同开展的关于支持性决策的研究项目的经历。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 7;8(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00406-1.
8
Participatory data analysis alongside co-researchers who have Down syndrome.与患有唐氏综合征的共同研究人员一起进行参与式数据分析。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):23-33. doi: 10.1111/jar.12080. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
9
Material practices for meaningful engagement: An analysis of participatory learning and action research techniques for data generation and analysis in a health research partnership.有意义参与的物质实践:对参与式学习和行动研究技术在健康研究伙伴关系中数据生成和分析的分析。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):159-170. doi: 10.1111/hex.12598. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
10
Caring communities as collective learning process: findings and lessons learned from a participatory research project in Austria.关爱社区作为集体学习过程:来自奥地利一个参与式研究项目的发现与经验教训
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;7(Suppl 2):S84-S98. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.03.05.

本文引用的文献

1
Digitalising the Age-Friendly City: Insights from Participatory Action Research.数字化友好城市:参与式行动研究的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 9;17(21):8281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218281.