Christophersen C, Fonnes S, Andresen K, Rosenberg J
Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):29-37. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02359-4. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Hernia repair is a common procedure; however, an overview is lacking regarding the impact of annual surgeon volume and total surgical experience on the outcome of hernia repair. We aimed to explore the impact of annual surgeon volume and total surgical experience on outcomes of groin and primary ventral hernia repair.
This systematic review followed the Prefered Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. A protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020176140). PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched. We investigated recurrence rates after groin and primary ventral hernia repair reported according to annual surgeon volume or total surgical experience with at least 6 months follow-up. Surgeons were pooled in three overlapping categories: high-volume (> 50 cases/year), medium-volume (11-50 cases/year) and low-volume (≤ 25 cases/year).
Ten records for groin hernia and one for primary ventral hernia were included. The median (range) recurrence rates after laparoscopic groin hernia repair for high, medium, and low-volume surgeons were 2.6% (2.3-3.0), 2.4% (0.7-4.6), and 4.2% (1.0-6.8), respectively. The median (range) recurrence rate after open groin hernia repair for high, medium, and low-volume surgeons were 2.1% (2.0-2.2), 1.7% (1.6-2.3), and 2.4% (2.2-5.0). The groin hernia recurrence rate seemed to increase when annual surgeon volume decreased below 25 cases/year. For primary ventral hernia, increased annual surgeon volume was associated with decreased reoperation rate.
High-volume surgeons seemed to have lower rates of hernia recurrence after groin as well as primary ventral hernia repair and our data supports the need for centralization of groin hernia repair on individual surgeons.
疝修补术是一种常见的手术;然而,关于外科医生的年手术量和总手术经验对疝修补术结果的影响,目前尚缺乏综述。我们旨在探讨外科医生的年手术量和总手术经验对腹股沟疝和原发性腹疝修补术结果的影响。
本系统评价遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。一项方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42020176140)登记。检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane CENTRAL数据库。我们调查了根据外科医生年手术量或总手术经验报告的腹股沟疝和原发性腹疝修补术后的复发率,随访时间至少为6个月。外科医生被分为三个重叠类别:高年手术量(>50例/年)、中年手术量(11 - 50例/年)和低年手术量(≤25例/年)。
纳入了10篇关于腹股沟疝的记录和1篇关于原发性腹疝的记录。高、中、低年手术量的外科医生行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的复发率中位数(范围)分别为2.6%(2.3 - 3.0)、2.4%(0.7 - 4.6)和4.2%(1.0 - 6.8)。高、中、低年手术量的外科医生行开放性腹股沟疝修补术后的复发率中位数(范围)分别为2.1%(2.0 - 2.2)、1.7%(1.6 - 2.3)和2.4%(2.2 - 5.0)。当外科医生年手术量降至低于25例/年时,腹股沟疝复发率似乎会增加。对于原发性腹疝,外科医生年手术量增加与再次手术率降低相关。
高年手术量的外科医生在腹股沟疝以及原发性腹疝修补术后的疝复发率似乎较低,我们的数据支持腹股沟疝修补术应集中于个别外科医生的必要性。