Mita Naoki, Iwashita Takuji, Senju Akihiko, Ichikawa Hironao, Iwasa Yuhei, Uemura Shinya, Yasuda Ichiro, Shimizu Masahito
First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan.
Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01582-8.
Combining upper and lower gastrointestinal tract (GI) approaches allows expansion of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) indications for pelvic lesions. The upper GI approach has been used for pelvic lesions around the level of the aortoiliac bifurcation in our institution. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of EUS-FNA for pelvic lesions via the upper and lower GI approaches.
All consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA for the pelvic lesion between January 2008 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Pelvic lesions were defined as lesions located around and below the aortoiliac bifurcation level. The primary outcome was technical success rate, and the secondary outcomes were the diagnostic capability of EUS-FNA for malignancy and the safety.
EUS-FNA for pelvic lesions was performed in 49 patients: upper and lower GI approaches were used in 28 and 21 patients, respectively. The technical success rates were 91.8% (45/49) in all patients: 89.3% (25/28) and 95.2% (20/21) with the upper and lower GI approaches, respectively. Among patients who achieved technical success, the diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was 97.8% (44/45) in all patients: 100% (25/25) and 95.0% (19/20) with the upper and lower GI approaches, respectively. One (2.0%) patient developed an adverse event of sigmoid colon perforation.
EUS-FNA for pelvic lesions via the upper and lower GI approaches was a safe, feasible, and effective method, although careful endoscopic manipulation is required to avoid perforation, especially with the lower GI approach. Further large-scale, well-designed studies are needed to validate our findings.
结合上消化道和下消化道(GI)途径可扩大内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(EUS-FNA)对盆腔病变的适应证范围。在我们机构,上消化道途径已用于腹主动脉髂总动脉分叉水平周围的盆腔病变。本研究的目的是评估经上消化道和下消化道途径进行EUS-FNA治疗盆腔病变的可行性和安全性。
回顾性分析2008年1月至2018年12月期间所有因盆腔病变接受EUS-FNA的连续患者。盆腔病变定义为位于腹主动脉髂总动脉分叉水平及其以下的病变。主要结局是技术成功率,次要结局是EUS-FNA对恶性肿瘤的诊断能力和安全性。
49例患者接受了盆腔病变的EUS-FNA:分别有28例和21例患者采用了上消化道和下消化道途径。所有患者的技术成功率为91.8%(45/49):上消化道和下消化道途径的技术成功率分别为89.3%(25/28)和95.2%(20/21)。在技术成功的患者中,所有患者对恶性肿瘤的诊断准确率为97.8%(44/45):上消化道和下消化道途径的诊断准确率分别为100%(25/25)和95.0%(19/20)。1例(2.0%)患者发生了乙状结肠穿孔的不良事件。
经上消化道和下消化道途径进行盆腔病变的EUS-FNA是一种安全、可行且有效的方法,尽管需要仔细的内镜操作以避免穿孔,尤其是在下消化道途径中。需要进一步开展大规模、设计良好的研究来验证我们的发现。