• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不适合强化化疗的 AML 患者中时间依赖性治疗效果的研究:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。

Time-dependent treatment effects of metronomic chemotherapy in unfit AML patients: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Faculty of Medicine, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2021 Jan 6;14(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05423-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-020-05423-5
PMID:33407868
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7788774/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the presence of the time-dependent effect of metronomic chemotherapy for the treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were unfit for standard chemotherapy and to reanalyze the data using an appropriate statistical approach in the presence of non-proportional hazards, the restricted mean survival time (RMST).

RESULTS

This was a secondary analysis of a multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial, which was conducted in seven tertiary care hospitals across Thailand. A total of 81 unfit AML patients were randomized into two treatment groups, metronomic chemotherapy and palliative treatment. The hazard ratio of metronomic chemotherapy over palliative treatment was time-dependent. At three landmark time points of 90, 180, 365 days, the restricted mean survival time differences were 13.3 (95% CI 1.9-24.7) days, 28.9 (95% CI 3.3-54.4) days, and 40.4 (95% CI - 1.3 to 82.0) days, respectively. With non-proportional hazards modeling and RMST analysis, we were able to conclude that metronomic chemotherapy is a potentially effective alternative treatment for elderly AML patients who were medically unfit for intensive chemotherapy. In the future clinical trials, non-proportional hazards should be carefully inspected and properly handled with appropriate statistical methods. Trial registration Randomized clinical trial TCTR20150918001; registration date: 15/09/2015. Retrospectively registered.

摘要

目的

探讨节拍化疗治疗不适合标准化疗的老年急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的时间依赖性效应,并在存在非比例风险时使用适当的统计方法重新分析数据,即限制性平均生存时间(RMST)。

结果

这是一项在泰国 7 家三级护理医院进行的多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验的二次分析。共有 81 名不适合 AML 的患者被随机分为节拍化疗组和姑息治疗组。节拍化疗与姑息治疗的风险比随时间变化而变化。在 90、180、365 天三个标志性时间点,RMST 差异分别为 13.3(95%CI 1.9-24.7)天、28.9(95%CI 3.3-54.4)天和 40.4(95%CI -1.3 至 82.0)天。通过非比例风险模型和 RMST 分析,我们得出结论,节拍化疗是一种潜在有效的替代治疗方法,适用于不适合强化化疗的老年 AML 患者。在未来的临床试验中,应仔细检查非比例风险,并使用适当的统计方法进行适当处理。

试验注册

随机临床试验 TCTR20150918001;注册日期:2015 年 9 月 15 日。回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e0/7788774/e551b4ca96a3/13104_2020_5423_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e0/7788774/e75dce8baef4/13104_2020_5423_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e0/7788774/e551b4ca96a3/13104_2020_5423_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e0/7788774/e75dce8baef4/13104_2020_5423_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e0/7788774/e551b4ca96a3/13104_2020_5423_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Time-dependent treatment effects of metronomic chemotherapy in unfit AML patients: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.不适合强化化疗的 AML 患者中时间依赖性治疗效果的研究:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Jan 6;14(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05423-5.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Metronomic Chemotherapy Versus Palliative Hydroxyurea in Unfit Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.节拍化疗与姑息性羟基脲治疗不适合急性髓系白血病患者的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、开放标签随机对照试验
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Jan 1;21(1):147-155. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.1.147.
3
Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial.维奈托克联合 LDAC 方案用于不适合强化化疗的新诊断 AML:一项 3 期随机安慰剂对照试验。
Blood. 2020 Jun 11;135(24):2137-2145. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020004856.
4
Is there a role for metronomic induction (and maintenance) therapy in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia? A literature review.节拍诱导(及维持)疗法在老年急性髓系白血病患者中是否有作用?一项文献综述。
Indian J Cancer. 2013 Apr-Jun;50(2):154-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.117033.
5
DECIDER: prospective randomized multicenter phase II trial of low-dose decitabine (DAC) administered alone or in combination with the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in patients >60 years with acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible for induction chemotherapy.DECIDER:一项前瞻性随机多中心II期试验,针对年龄大于60岁、不符合诱导化疗条件的急性髓系白血病患者,单独使用低剂量地西他滨(DAC),或与组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂丙戊酸(VPA)及全反式维甲酸(ATRA)联合使用。
BMC Cancer. 2015 May 26;15:430. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1432-5.
6
Real-world experience with decitabine as a first-line treatment in 306 elderly acute myeloid leukaemia patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy.306 例不适合强化化疗的老年急性髓系白血病患者一线使用地西他滨的真实世界经验。
Hematol Oncol. 2019 Oct;37(4):447-455. doi: 10.1002/hon.2663. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
7
Pertuzumab and trastuzumab with or without metronomic chemotherapy for older patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (EORTC 75111-10114): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial from the Elderly Task Force/Breast Cancer Group.帕妥珠单抗和曲妥珠单抗联合或不联合节拍化疗治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阳性转移性乳腺癌老年患者(EORTC 75111-10114):老年特别工作组/乳腺癌研究组的一项开放标签、随机、2 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):323-336. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30083-4. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
8
Addition of sorafenib versus placebo to standard therapy in patients aged 60 years or younger with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (SORAML): a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial.索拉非尼联合标准疗法与安慰剂联合标准疗法治疗 60 岁及以下初诊急性髓系白血病患者(SORAML):一项多中心、2 期、随机对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1691-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00362-9. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
9
Decitabine Versus Intensive Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.地西他滨与强化化疗治疗新诊断的老年急性髓系白血病患者的比较
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 May;19(5):290-299.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
10
Acute myeloid leukemia in the medically unfit elderly patients.不适合医学治疗的老年急性髓系白血病患者。
Leuk Res. 2023 Jul;130:107306. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2023.107306. Epub 2023 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Restricted mean survival time approach versus time-varying coefficient Cox model for quantifying treatment effect when hazards are non-proportional.当风险不成比例时,用于量化治疗效果的受限平均生存时间方法与时变系数Cox模型的比较
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02608-z.
2
Metronomic Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients.老年患者的节拍化疗。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Apr;26(4):359-376. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01505-w. Epub 2024 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Why Test for Proportional Hazards?为什么要检验比例风险?
JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1401-1402. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1267.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Metronomic Chemotherapy Versus Palliative Hydroxyurea in Unfit Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.节拍化疗与姑息性羟基脲治疗不适合急性髓系白血病患者的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、开放标签随机对照试验
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Jan 1;21(1):147-155. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.1.147.
3
Methods for Accommodating Nonproportional Hazards in Clinical Trials: Ready for the Primary Analysis?
临床试验中处理非比例风险的方法:准备好进行初步分析了吗?
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;37(35):3455-3459. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01681. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
4
Nonproportional Hazards for Time-to-Event Outcomes in Clinical Trials: JACC Review Topic of the Week.临床试验中事件时间终点的非比例风险:JACC 每周综述专题。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 22;74(16):2102-2112. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1034.
5
Estimating and Interpreting the Overall Survival Benefit of Checkpoint Inhibitors via Meta-analysis-Reply.通过荟萃分析评估和解读检查点抑制剂的总生存获益——回复
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;4(8):1138-1139. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1105.
6
Assessing Metronomic Chemotherapy for Progressive Pediatric Solid Malignant Tumors.评估节拍化疗对进展期小儿实体恶性肿瘤的疗效
JAMA Oncol. 2018 May 1;4(5):743. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3983.
7
Interpretability of Cancer Clinical Trial Results Using Restricted Mean Survival Time as an Alternative to the Hazard Ratio.使用受限平均生存时间替代风险比来解释癌症临床试验结果的可解释性。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1692-1696. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2797.
8
Metronomic Chemotherapy vs Best Supportive Care in Progressive Pediatric Solid Malignant Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.节拍化疗与最佳支持治疗对进展性小儿实体恶性肿瘤的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1222-1227. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0324.
9
Restricted Mean Survival Time: An Obligatory End Point for Time-to-Event Analysis in Cancer Trials?受限平均生存时间:癌症试验中事件发生时间分析的必要终点?
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 1;34(28):3474-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.8045. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
10
Comparison of Treatment Effects Measured by the Hazard Ratio and by the Ratio of Restricted Mean Survival Times in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials.肿瘤学随机对照试验中风险比和受限平均生存时间比测量的治疗效果比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 20;34(15):1813-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2488. Epub 2016 Feb 16.