• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替奈普酶与阿替普酶在基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗前的比较。

Tenecteplase vs Alteplase Before Endovascular Therapy in Basilar Artery Occlusion.

机构信息

From the Department of Medicine and Neurology (F. Alemseged, G.S., L.C., B.Y., M.W.P., S.M.D., P.J.M., N.Y. B.C.V.C.), University of Melbourne, and Department of Radiology (C.W., S.B., R.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia; Stroke Unit (F. Alemseged, A.R., F.S., M.D.) and Department of Biomedicine and Prevention (F.D.), University Hospital of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; Department of Neurology (F.C.N.), Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology (V.P.), Institute of Neuroradiology (D.K.), and Dresden Neurovascular Center (V.P., D.K.), University of Technology Dresden, Germany; Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (G.B.), Sainte-Anne-Hospital, Paris, France; Department of Neurology (T.J.K.), Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (T.Y.W.), Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand; Division of Medicine (D.S.), Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; NEUROFARBA Department (F. Arba), Careggi University Hospital, Florence; ASST Valcamonica (A.M.), Department of Neurology, Esine, Italy; Department of Neurosciences (H.M.D.), Eastern Health, Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.B.), Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland; Department of Neurology (B.O.), Gosford Hospital, New South Wales; and Population Health and Immunity Division (N.Y.), The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

Neurology. 2021 Mar 2;96(9):e1272-e1277. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011520. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000011520
PMID:33408145
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of tenecteplase (TNK), a genetically modified variant of alteplase with greater fibrin specificity and longer half-life than alteplase, prior to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO).

METHODS

To determine whether TNK is associated with better reperfusion rates than alteplase prior to EVT in BAO, clinical and procedural data of consecutive patients with BAO from the Basilar Artery Treatment and Management (BATMAN) registry and the Tenecteplase vs Alteplase before Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke (EXTEND-IA TNK) trial were retrospectively analyzed. Reperfusion >50% or absence of retrievable thrombus at the time of the initial angiogram was evaluated.

RESULTS

We included 110 patients with BAO treated with IV thrombolysis prior to EVT (mean age 69 [SD 14] years; median NIH Stroke Scale score 16 [interquartile range (IQR) 7-32]). Nineteen patients were thrombolysed with TNK (0.25 mg/kg or 0.40 mg/kg) and 91 with alteplase (0.9 mg/kg). Reperfusion >50% occurred in 26% (n = 5/19) of patients thrombolysed with TNK vs 7% (n = 6/91) thrombolysed with alteplase (risk ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.3-12; = 0.02), despite shorter thrombolysis to arterial puncture time in the TNK-treated patients (48 [IQR 40-71] minutes) vs alteplase-treated patients (110 [IQR 51-185] minutes; = 0.004). No difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was observed (0/19 [0%] TNK, 1/91 [1%] alteplase; = 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

TNK may be associated with an increased rate of reperfusion in comparison with alteplase before EVT in BAO. Randomized controlled trials to compare TNK with alteplase in patients with BAO are warranted.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIERS

NCT02388061 and NCT03340493.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that TNK leads to higher reperfusion rates in comparison with alteplase prior to EVT in patients with BAO.

摘要

目的

研究替奈普酶(TNK)在血管内血栓切除术(EVT)前对基底动脉闭塞(BAO)患者的疗效,TNK 是一种纤维蛋白特异性更强、半衰期比阿替普酶更长的基因改良变体。

方法

为了确定 TNK 是否比 EVT 前的阿替普酶具有更好的再灌注率,我们回顾性分析了来自基底动脉治疗和管理(BATMAN)登记处和替奈普酶与阿替普酶在缺血性卒中血管内治疗前(EXTEND-IA TNK)试验的连续 BAO 患者的临床和程序数据。评估初始血管造影时>50%的再灌注或不存在可回收血栓。

结果

我们纳入了 110 例接受 EVT 前 IV 溶栓治疗的 BAO 患者(平均年龄 69 [14]岁;中位数 NIH 卒中量表评分 16 [四分位距 7-32])。19 例患者接受 TNK(0.25mg/kg 或 0.40mg/kg)溶栓,91 例患者接受阿替普酶溶栓。TNK 溶栓患者的再灌注率>50%为 26%(n=5/19),阿替普酶溶栓患者为 7%(n=6/91)(风险比 4.0,95%置信区间 1.3-12;P=0.02),尽管 TNK 治疗患者的溶栓至动脉穿刺时间更短(48 [四分位距 40-71]分钟)vs 阿替普酶治疗患者(110 [四分位距 51-185]分钟;P=0.004)。未观察到症状性颅内出血的差异(0/19 [0%] TNK,1/91 [1%] 阿替普酶;P=0.9)。

结论

与 EVT 前的阿替普酶相比,TNK 可能与 BAO 患者再灌注率增加相关。需要进行随机对照试验比较 TNK 与阿替普酶在 BAO 患者中的疗效。

临床试验注册号

NCT02388061 和 NCT03340493。

证据分类

本研究提供了 III 级证据,表明与 EVT 前的阿替普酶相比,TNK 可使 BAO 患者的再灌注率更高。

相似文献

1
Tenecteplase vs Alteplase Before Endovascular Therapy in Basilar Artery Occlusion.替奈普酶与阿替普酶在基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗前的比较。
Neurology. 2021 Mar 2;96(9):e1272-e1277. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011520. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
Tenecteplase versus alteplase before endovascular thrombectomy (EXTEND-IA TNK): A multicenter, randomized, controlled study.替奈普酶与血管内血栓切除术前的阿替普酶(EXTEND-IA TNK):一项多中心、随机、对照研究。
Int J Stroke. 2018 Apr;13(3):328-334. doi: 10.1177/1747493017733935. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
3
Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke.替奈普酶与阿替普酶在缺血性脑卒中取栓前的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1573-1582. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716405.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase in Older Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Pooled Analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK Trials.替奈普酶在老年大血管闭塞患者中的安全性和有效性:EXTEND-IA TNK试验的汇总分析
Neurology. 2022 Mar 22;98(12):e1292-e1301. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013302. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
5
Tenecteplase or Alteplase Better in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion: A Single Center Observational Study.替奈普酶或阿替普酶治疗大动脉闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效比较:一项单中心观察性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 28;58(9):1169. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091169.
6
Determining the optimal dose of tenecteplase before endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke (EXTEND-IA TNK Part 2): A multicenter, randomized, controlled study.在缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗前确定替奈普酶的最佳剂量(EXTEND-IA TNK 第 2 部分):一项多中心、随机、对照研究。
Int J Stroke. 2020 Jul;15(5):567-572. doi: 10.1177/1747493019879652. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Tenecteplase versus alteplase before stroke thrombectomy: outcomes after system-wide transitions in Pennsylvania.替奈普酶与阿替普酶在卒中取栓前的比较:宾夕法尼亚州全面过渡后的结果。
J Neurol. 2024 Aug;271(8):5637-5641. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12530-x. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
8
Association of Time to Thrombolysis With Early Reperfusion After Alteplase and Tenecteplase in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion.阿替普酶和替奈普酶治疗大血管闭塞患者溶栓时间与早期再灌注的关系。
Neurology. 2024 Apr 9;102(7):e209166. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209166. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Patients With Tandem Lesion Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK Trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗串联病变卒中患者的安全性和有效性:EXTEND-IA TNK 试验的事后分析。
Neurology. 2023 May 2;100(18):e1900-e1911. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207138. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
10
Functional Outcome and Hemorrhage Rates After Bridging Therapy With Tenecteplase or Alteplase in Patients With Large Ischemic Core.大缺血核心患者应用替奈普酶或阿替普酶桥接治疗后的功能结局和出血率。
Neurology. 2024 Jul 9;103(1):e209398. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209398. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse events of tissue plasminogen activators in acute myocardial infarction patients: a real-world and pharmacovigilance database analysis.急性心肌梗死患者组织型纤溶酶原激活物的不良反应:真实世界和药物警戒数据库分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Aug 23;24(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04121-5.
2
Endovascular Treatment for Basilar Artery Occlusion.基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 16;13(14):4153. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144153.
3
Efficacy and safety of intravenous tenecteplase compared to alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.
静脉注射替奈普酶与机械取栓前阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性的Meta 分析。
J Neurol. 2024 Jul;271(7):3928-3941. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12445-7. Epub 2024 May 23.
4
Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性基底动脉闭塞患者血管内血栓切除术与静脉溶栓治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2024 Jun;271(6):3039-3049. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12353-w. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
5
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的比较:一项随机和非随机研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2024 May;271(5):2309-2323. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12243-1. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
6
Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase for Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓治疗的系统评价和Meta分析
Neurol Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):1553-1572. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00530-4. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
7
Improving neurological outcome for acute basilar artery occlusion with sufficient recanalization after thrombectomy by intraarterial tenecteplase (INSIST-IT): Rationale and design.经皮腔内血管内使用替奈普酶治疗急性基底动脉闭塞血栓切除术再通后改善神经功能结局的研究(INSIST-IT):理论基础和设计。
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Jun;8(2):591-597. doi: 10.1177/23969873231164790. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
8
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) expedited recommendation on tenecteplase for acute ischaemic stroke.欧洲卒中组织(ESO)发布了关于替奈普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中的加速推荐。
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Mar;8(1):8-54. doi: 10.1177/23969873221150022. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
9
Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy vs. Bridging Therapy in Stroke Patients in A "Stroke Belt" Region of Southern Europe.直接机械血栓切除术与桥接治疗在南欧“卒中带”地区卒中患者中的比较
J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 28;13(3):440. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030440.
10
Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?用替奈普酶替代阿替普酶:时机成熟了吗?
J Stroke. 2023 Jan;25(1):72-80. doi: 10.5853/jos.2022.02880. Epub 2023 Jan 31.