• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Patients With Tandem Lesion Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK Trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗串联病变卒中患者的安全性和有效性:EXTEND-IA TNK 试验的事后分析。
Neurology. 2023 May 2;100(18):e1900-e1911. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207138. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase in Older Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Pooled Analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK Trials.替奈普酶在老年大血管闭塞患者中的安全性和有效性:EXTEND-IA TNK试验的汇总分析
Neurology. 2022 Mar 22;98(12):e1292-e1301. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013302. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
3
Tenecteplase vs Alteplase Before Endovascular Therapy in Basilar Artery Occlusion.替奈普酶与阿替普酶在基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗前的比较。
Neurology. 2021 Mar 2;96(9):e1272-e1277. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011520. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Tenecteplase Bolus in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results of Two Open-Label, Multicenter Trials.急性缺血性脑卒中静脉注射替奈普酶推注的疗效和安全性:两项开放标签、多中心试验的结果。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2018 Oct;18(5):387-395. doi: 10.1007/s40256-018-0284-1.
5
Association of Time to Thrombolysis With Early Reperfusion After Alteplase and Tenecteplase in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion.阿替普酶和替奈普酶治疗大血管闭塞患者溶栓时间与早期再灌注的关系。
Neurology. 2024 Apr 9;102(7):e209166. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209166. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
6
Efficacy and safety outcomes of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性:9 项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Neurol Sci. 2024 Mar 15;458:122912. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.122912. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
7
Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 Hours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗 4.5 小时内急性缺血性脑卒中的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurology. 2024 Nov 12;103(9):e209903. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209903. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
8
Outcomes with IV tenecteplase and IV alteplase for acute ischemic stroke with or without thrombectomy in real-world settings in the United States.在美国现实环境中,静脉注射替奈普酶和静脉注射阿替普酶用于急性缺血性卒中(无论是否进行血栓切除术)的疗效。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023 Feb;32(2):106898. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106898. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
9
Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke.替奈普酶与阿替普酶在缺血性脑卒中取栓前的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1573-1582. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716405.
10
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Aging (Albany NY). 2023 Dec 26;15(24):14889-14899. doi: 10.18632/aging.205315.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase in the Treatment of Acute Branch Atheromatous Disease: A Retrospective Multicenter Case-Control Study.替奈普酶治疗急性分支动脉粥样硬化疾病的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性多中心病例对照研究
Neurol Ther. 2025 Aug 31. doi: 10.1007/s40120-025-00807-w.
2
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于急性缺血性卒中伴大血管闭塞患者静脉溶栓的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1487711. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1487711. eCollection 2025.
3
Intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase versus alteplase combined with endovascular treatment of anterior circulation tandem occlusions: A pooled analysis of ETIS and TETRIS.替奈普酶与阿替普酶联合血管内治疗前循环串联闭塞的静脉溶栓治疗:ETIS 和 TETRIS 的汇总分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Mar;9(1):124-134. doi: 10.1177/23969873231206894. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
4
Safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in stroke patients with carotid tandem lesions: Results from the AcT trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗串联性颈动脉病变脑卒中患者的安全性和有效性:AcT 试验结果。
Int J Stroke. 2024 Mar;19(3):322-330. doi: 10.1177/17474930231205208. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in Canada (AcT): a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, registry-linked, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.加拿大急性缺血性脑卒中静脉内替奈普酶与阿替普酶比较(AcT):一项实用的、多中心、开放标签、与登记系统相关联、随机化、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 16;400(10347):161-169. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01054-6. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
2
Endovascular Therapy of Anterior Circulation Tandem Occlusions: Pooled Analysis From the TITAN and ETIS Registries.前循环串联闭塞血管内治疗:TITAN 和 ETIS 注册研究的汇总分析。
Stroke. 2021 Oct;52(10):3097-3105. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033032. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Endovascular therapy with or without intravenous thrombolysis in acute stroke with tandem occlusion.急性串联性闭塞卒中血管内治疗联合或不联合静脉溶栓治疗。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Apr;14(4):314-320. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017202. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
4
Tandem Lesions in Anterior Circulation Stroke: Analysis of the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment.串联病变在前循环卒中中的作用:德国卒中登记库血管内治疗分析。
Stroke. 2021 Apr;52(4):1265-1275. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031797. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
5
Carotid Stenting and Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Tandem Occlusions: Antithrombotic Treatment and Functional Outcome.急性缺血性脑卒中合并串联闭塞患者的颈动脉支架置入术和机械取栓术:抗栓治疗与功能结局。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Nov;41(11):2088-2093. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6768. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Tandem Carotid Occlusions: Analysis of a Single-Center Cohort.急性串联性颈动脉闭塞血管内治疗的疗效与安全性:单中心队列分析
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2020;10(2):50-58. doi: 10.1159/000507919. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
7
Tandem Carotid Lesions in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Challenges, and Future Directions.串联性颈动脉病变在急性缺血性脑卒中中的机制、治疗挑战及未来方向。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jul;41(7):1142-1148. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6582. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
8
Effect of Intravenous Tenecteplase Dose on Cerebral Reperfusion Before Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: The EXTEND-IA TNK Part 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.静脉注射替奈普酶剂量对大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中患者取栓前脑再灌注的影响:EXTEND-IA TNK 第 2 部分随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1257-1265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1511.
9
A randomized pilot study of patients with tandem carotid lesions undergoing thrombectomy.支架取栓术治疗串联性颈动脉病变患者的随机初步研究
J Neuroradiol. 2020 Nov;47(6):416-420. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
10
Lack of Consensus Among Stroke Experts on the Optimal Management of Patients With Acute Tandem Occlusion.急性串联闭塞患者的最佳治疗方案,脑卒中专家之间缺乏共识。
Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1254-1256. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023758.

替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗串联病变卒中患者的安全性和有效性:EXTEND-IA TNK 试验的事后分析。

Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Patients With Tandem Lesion Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK Trials.

机构信息

From the Department of Medicine and Neurology (V.Y., L.C., N.Y., B.Y., G.S., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.), Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville; Melbourne Medical School (L.C., V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg; Department of Radiology (P.J.M., B.C.V.C.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville; Department of Neurology (T.J.K., B.Y., P.M.D.), Royal Adelaide Hospital; Population Health and Immunity Division (N.Y.), The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurology (T. Wu), Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand; Department of Neurology (D.S.), Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane; Department of Neurology (P.B.), Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport; Department of Neurosciences (H.M.D., P.M.C.C.), Eastern Health and Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton; Royal North Shore Hospital (A.M.), New South Wales; Department of Medicine and Neurology (T. Wijeratne), Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne and Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, St Albans; Department of Neurology (C.G.-E.), John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales; Department of Neurology (G.C.), Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Neuroscience (G.C.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; NeuroInterventional Radiology Unit (R.V.C.), Monash Health, Monash University; and Department of Neurology (D.J.C., M.W.P.), Liverpool Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Neurology. 2023 May 2;100(18):e1900-e1911. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207138. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000207138
PMID:36878701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10159769/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The safety and efficacy of tenecteplase (TNK) in patients with tandem lesion (TL) stroke is unknown. We performed a comparative analysis of TNK and alteplase in patients with TLs.

METHODS

We first compared the treatment effect of TNK and alteplase in patients with TLs using individual patient data from the EXTEND-IA TNK trials. We evaluated intracranial reperfusion at initial angiographic assessment and 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) with ordinal logistic and Firth regression models. Because 2 key outcomes, mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), were few in number among those who received alteplase in the EXTEND-IA TNK trials, we generated pooled estimates for these outcomes by supplementing trial data with estimates of incidence obtained through a meta-analysis of studies identified in a systematic review. We then calculated unadjusted risk differences to compare the pooled estimates for those receiving alteplase with the incidence observed in the trial among those receiving TNK.

RESULTS

Seventy-one of 483 patients (15%) in the EXTEND-IA TNK trials possessed a TL. In patients with TLs, intracranial reperfusion was observed in 11/56 (20%) of TNK-treated patients vs 1/15 (7%) alteplase-treated patients (adjusted odds ratio 2.19; 95% CI 0.28-17.29). No significant difference in 90-day mRS was observed (adjusted common odds ratio 1.48; 95% CI 0.44-5.00). A pooled study-level proportion of alteplase-associated mortality and sICH was 0.14 (95% CI 0.08-0.21) and 0.09 (95% CI 0.04-0.16), respectively. Compared with a mortality rate of 0.09 (95% CI 0.03-0.20) and an sICH rate of 0.07 (95% CI 0.02-0.17) in TNK-treated patients, no significant difference was observed.

DISCUSSION

Functional outcomes, mortality, and sICH did not significantly differ between patients with TLs treated with TNK and those treated with alteplase.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that TNK is associated with similar rates of intracranial reperfusion, functional outcome, mortality, and sICH compared with alteplase in patients with acute stroke due to TLs. However, the CIs do not rule out clinically important differences. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02388061; clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03340493.

摘要

背景与目的

替奈普酶(TNK)在串联病变(TL)卒中患者中的安全性和疗效尚不清楚。我们对 TNK 和阿替普酶在 TL 患者中的应用进行了比较分析。

方法

我们首先使用 EXTEND-IA TNK 试验的个体患者数据比较了 TL 患者中 TNK 和阿替普酶的治疗效果。我们使用有序逻辑和 Firth 回归模型评估了初始血管造影评估时的颅内再灌注和 90 天改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)。由于 EXTEND-IA TNK 试验中接受阿替普酶治疗的患者中死亡率和症状性颅内出血(sICH)这两个关键结局的数量较少,我们通过补充试验数据和系统评价中确定的研究的发生率的汇总估计值来生成这些结局的汇总估计值。然后,我们计算了未调整的风险差异,以比较接受阿替普酶治疗的患者的汇总估计值与接受 TNK 治疗的患者的试验中观察到的发生率。

结果

在 EXTEND-IA TNK 试验的 483 例患者中,有 71 例(15%)患有 TL。在 TL 患者中,颅内再灌注在 56 例 TNK 治疗患者中观察到 11 例(20%),在 15 例阿替普酶治疗患者中观察到 1 例(7%)(调整后的优势比 2.19;95%CI 0.28-17.29)。90 天 mRS 无显著差异(调整后的共同优势比 1.48;95%CI 0.44-5.00)。阿替普酶相关死亡率和 sICH 的 pooled study-level 比例分别为 0.14(95%CI 0.08-0.21)和 0.09(95%CI 0.04-0.16)。与 TNK 治疗患者的死亡率(0.09;95%CI 0.03-0.20)和 sICH 发生率(0.07;95%CI 0.02-0.17)相比,无显著差异。

讨论

TL 患者接受 TNK 和阿替普酶治疗的功能结局、死亡率和 sICH 无显著差异。

证据分类

这项研究提供了 III 级证据,表明在 TL 引起的急性卒中患者中,与阿替普酶相比,TNK 与颅内再灌注、功能结局、死亡率和 sICH 相似的发生率相关。然而,CI 不能排除临床上重要的差异。

试验注册信息

clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02388061;clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03340493。