• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替奈普酶在老年大血管闭塞患者中的安全性和有效性:EXTEND-IA TNK试验的汇总分析

Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase in Older Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Pooled Analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK Trials.

作者信息

Yogendrakumar Vignan, Churilov Leonid, Mitchell Peter J, Kleinig Timothy J, Yassi Nawaf, Thijs Vincent, Wu Teddy Y, Shah Darshan G, Ng Felix C, Dewey Helen M, Wijeratne Tissa, Yan Bernard, Desmond Patricia M, Parsons Mark W, Donnan Geoffrey Alan, Davis Stephen M, Campbell Bruce C V

机构信息

From the Department of Medicine and Neurology (V.Y., L.C., N.Y., F.C.N., B.Y., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.), Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville; Department of Medicine (L.C., V.T.), Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (L.C., V.T., B.C.V.C.) and Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital (P.J.M., B.Y., P.M.D.), University of Melbourne, Parkville; Department of Neurology (T.J.K.), Royal Adelaide Hospital; Population Health and Immunity Division (N.Y.), The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurology (T.Y.W.), Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand; Department of Neurology (D.G.S.), Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland; Eastern Health and Eastern Health Clinical School, Department of Neurosciences (H.M.D.), Monash University, Clayton, Victoria; Department of Medicine and Neurology (T.W.), Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne and Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, St Albans Victoria; and Department of Neurology (M.W.P.), Liverpool Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Neurology. 2022 Mar 22;98(12):e1292-e1301. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013302. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000013302
PMID:35017305
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Detailed study of tenecteplase (TNK) in patients older than 80 years is limited. The objective of our study was to assess the safety and efficacy of TNK at 0.25 and 0.40 mg/kg doses in patients older than 80 years with large vessel occlusion.

METHODS

We performed a pooled analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK randomized controlled trials (n = 502). Patients were adults presenting with ischemic stroke due to occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid, middle cerebral, or basilar artery presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. We compared the treatment effect of TNK 0.25 mg/kg, TNK 0.40 mg/kg, and alteplase 0.90 mg/kg, stratifying for patient age (>80 years). Outcomes evaluated include 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, all-cause mortality, and symptomatic ICH. Treatment effect was adjusted for baseline NIH Stroke Score, age, and time from symptom onset to puncture via mixed effects proportional odds and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

In patients >80 years (n = 137), TNK 0.25 mg/kg was associated with improved 90-day mRS (median 3 vs 4, adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) 2.70, 95% CI 1.23-5.94) and reduced mortality (acOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.91) vs 0.40 mg/kg. TNK 0.25 mg/kg was associated with improved 90-day mRS (median 3 vs 4, acOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.03-5.05) vs alteplase. No difference in 90-day mRS or mortality was detected between alteplase and TNK 0.40 mg/kg. Symptomatic ICH was observed in 4 patients treated with TNK 0.40 mg/kg, 1 patient treated with alteplase, and 0 patients treated with TNK 0.25 mg/kg. In patients ≤80 years, no differences in 90-day mRS, mortality, or symptomatic ICH were observed among TNK 0.25 mg/kg, alteplase, and TNK 0.40 mg/kg.

DISCUSSION

TNK 0.25 mg/kg was associated with improved 90-day mRS and lower mortality in patients older than 80 years. No differences among the doses were observed in younger patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

NCT02388061, NCT03340493.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg given before endovascular therapy in patients >80 years old with large vessel occlusion stroke is associated with better functional outcomes at 90 days and reduced mortality when compared to tenecteplase 0.40 mg/kg or alteplase 0.90 mg/kg.

摘要

背景与目的

对80岁以上患者使用替奈普酶(TNK)的详细研究有限。我们研究的目的是评估0.25和0.40mg/kg剂量的TNK在80岁以上大血管闭塞患者中的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们对EXTEND-IA TNK随机对照试验(n = 502)进行了汇总分析。患者为因颅内颈内动脉、大脑中动脉或基底动脉闭塞导致缺血性卒中的成年人,症状发作后4.5小时内就诊。我们比较了0.25mg/kg TNK、0.40mg/kg TNK和0.90mg/kg阿替普酶的治疗效果,并按患者年龄(>80岁)进行分层。评估的结局包括90天改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分、全因死亡率和症状性颅内出血。通过混合效应比例优势和逻辑回归模型对治疗效果进行调整,以校正基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分、年龄以及从症状发作到穿刺的时间。

结果

在>80岁的患者(n = 137)中,与0.40mg/kg相比,0.25mg/kg TNK与90天mRS改善(中位数3对4,校正共同优势比(acOR)2.70,9%CI 1.23 - 5.94)和死亡率降低(acOR 0.34,95%CI 0.l3 - 0.91)相关联。与阿替普酶相比,0.25mg/kg TNK与90天mRS改善(中位数3对4,acOR 2.28,95%CI 1.03 - \5.05)相关联。在阿替普酶和0.40mg/kg TNK之间未检测到90天mRS或死亡率的差异。接受0.40mg/kg TNK治疗的患者中有4例出现症状性颅内出血,接受阿替普酶治疗的患者中有1例,接受0.25mg/kg TNK治疗的患者中无。在≤80岁的患者中,0.25mg/kg TNK、阿替普酶和0.40mg/kg TNK之间在90天mRS、死亡率或症状性颅内出血方面未观察到差异。

讨论

0.25mg/kg TNK与80岁以上患者90天mRS改善和死亡率降低相关联。在较年轻患者中未观察到各剂量之间的差异。

试验注册信息

NCT02388061,NCT03340493。

证据分级

本研究提供了II类证据,即对于80岁以上大血管闭塞性卒中患者,在血管内治疗前给予0.25mg/kg替奈普酶与90天时更好的功能结局相关联,且与0.40mg/kg替奈普酶或0.90mg/kg阿替普酶相比死亡率降低。

相似文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase in Older Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Pooled Analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK Trials.替奈普酶在老年大血管闭塞患者中的安全性和有效性:EXTEND-IA TNK试验的汇总分析
Neurology. 2022 Mar 22;98(12):e1292-e1301. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013302. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Patients With Tandem Lesion Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK Trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗串联病变卒中患者的安全性和有效性:EXTEND-IA TNK 试验的事后分析。
Neurology. 2023 May 2;100(18):e1900-e1911. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207138. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
3
Tenecteplase vs Alteplase Before Endovascular Therapy in Basilar Artery Occlusion.替奈普酶与阿替普酶在基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗前的比较。
Neurology. 2021 Mar 2;96(9):e1272-e1277. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011520. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Effect of Intravenous Tenecteplase Dose on Cerebral Reperfusion Before Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: The EXTEND-IA TNK Part 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.静脉注射替奈普酶剂量对大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中患者取栓前脑再灌注的影响:EXTEND-IA TNK 第 2 部分随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1257-1265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1511.
5
Association of Time to Thrombolysis With Early Reperfusion After Alteplase and Tenecteplase in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion.阿替普酶和替奈普酶治疗大血管闭塞患者溶栓时间与早期再灌注的关系。
Neurology. 2024 Apr 9;102(7):e209166. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209166. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
6
Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke.替奈普酶与阿替普酶在缺血性脑卒中取栓前的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1573-1582. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716405.
7
Intravenous Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.大血管闭塞性卒中患者机械取栓术前静脉注射替奈普酶与阿替普酶的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2025;54(1):42-52. doi: 10.1159/000536669. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
8
Safety, Functional Disability, Healthcare Utilization, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Elderly Receiving Alteplase and Tenecteplase: A Secondary Analysis From the AcT Trial.接受阿替普酶和替奈普酶治疗的老年人的安全性、功能残疾、医疗保健利用及生活质量结果:来自AcT试验的二次分析
Stroke. 2025 May;56(5):1169-1179. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049512. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
9
Efficacy and safety outcomes of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性:9 项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Neurol Sci. 2024 Mar 15;458:122912. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.122912. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
10
Safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in stroke patients with carotid tandem lesions: Results from the AcT trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗串联性颈动脉病变脑卒中患者的安全性和有效性:AcT 试验结果。
Int J Stroke. 2024 Mar;19(3):322-330. doi: 10.1177/17474930231205208. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke: a new era in thrombolysis.替奈普酶用于急性缺血性卒中:溶栓治疗的新时代。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2025 May;83(5):1-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1808088. Epub 2025 Jun 1.
2
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于急性缺血性卒中伴大血管闭塞患者静脉溶栓的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1487711. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1487711. eCollection 2025.
3
Tenecteplase compared to alteplase in real-world outcome: A Swedish Stroke Register study.
替奈普酶与阿替普酶在真实世界结局的比较:一项瑞典卒中登记研究。
Ups J Med Sci. 2024 Oct 9;129. doi: 10.48101/ujms.v129.10459. eCollection 2024.
4
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the elderly patients: a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-2 trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于老年急性缺血性卒中患者的疗效比较:TRACE-2试验的事后分析
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2025 Feb 25;10(1):112-119. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-003048.
5
Comprehensive Review of Tenecteplase for Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.替奈普酶在急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓治疗中的全面综述。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e031692. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031692. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
6
Cost-effectiveness of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的成本效果分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Sep;8(3):638-646. doi: 10.1177/23969873231174943. Epub 2023 May 19.
7
Different dosing regimens of Tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke: A network meta-analysis of the clinical evidence.不同剂量替奈普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中:临床证据的网络荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Mar;8(1):93-105. doi: 10.1177/23969873221129924. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
8
Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?用替奈普酶替代阿替普酶:时机成熟了吗?
J Stroke. 2023 Jan;25(1):72-80. doi: 10.5853/jos.2022.02880. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
9
The efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性:一项更新的系统评价、成对比较和随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Feb;55(2):322-338. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02730-5. Epub 2022 Nov 30.