Martikainen Pekka, Korhonen Kaarina, Jelenkovic Aline, Lahtinen Hannu, Havulinna Aki, Ripatti Samuli, Borodulin Katja, Salomaa Veikko, Davey Smith George, Silventoinen Karri
Population Research Unit, University of Helsinki Faculty of Social Sciences, Helsinki, Finland
Centre for Health Equity Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Jul;75(7):651-657. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214358. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Genetic vulnerability to coronary heart disease (CHD) is well established, but little is known whether these effects are mediated or modified by equally well-established social determinants of CHD. We estimate the joint associations of the polygenetic risk score (PRS) for CHD and education on CHD events.
The data are from the 1992, 1997, 2002, 2007 and 2012 surveys of the population-based FINRISK Study including measures of social, behavioural and metabolic factors and genome-wide genotypes (N=26 203). Follow-up of fatal and non-fatal incident CHD events (N=2063) was based on nationwide registers.
Allowing for age, sex, study year, region of residence, study batch and principal components, those in the highest quartile of PRS for CHD had strongly increased risk of CHD events compared with the lowest quartile (HR=2.26; 95% CI: 1.97 to 2.59); associations were also observed for low education (HR=1.58; 95% CI: 1.32 to 1.89). These effects were largely independent of each other. Adjustment for baseline smoking, alcohol use, body mass index, igh-density lipoprotein (HDL) and total cholesterol, blood pressure and diabetes attenuated the PRS associations by 10% and the education associations by 50%. We do not find strong evidence of interactions between PRS and education.
PRS and education predict CHD events, and these associations are independent of each other. Both can improve CHD prediction beyond behavioural risks. The results imply that observational studies that do not have information on genetic risk factors for CHD do not provide confounded estimates for the association between education and CHD.
冠心病(CHD)的遗传易感性已得到充分证实,但对于这些影响是否由同样已明确的冠心病社会决定因素介导或修饰,人们知之甚少。我们估计冠心病多基因风险评分(PRS)与教育程度对冠心病事件的联合关联。
数据来自基于人群的芬兰风险研究(FINRISK Study)1992年、1997年、2002年、2007年和2012年的调查,包括社会、行为和代谢因素以及全基因组基因型的测量(N = 26203)。基于全国登记系统对致命和非致命冠心病事件(N = 2063)进行随访。
在考虑年龄、性别、研究年份、居住地区、研究批次和主成分后,冠心病PRS最高四分位数者与最低四分位数者相比,冠心病事件风险显著增加(HR = 2.26;95%CI:1.97至2.59);低教育程度者也观察到类似关联(HR = 1.58;95%CI:1.32至1.89)。这些影响在很大程度上相互独立。对基线吸烟、饮酒、体重指数、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)和总胆固醇、血压及糖尿病进行调整后,PRS关联减弱了10%,教育程度关联减弱了50%。我们未发现PRS与教育程度之间存在显著相互作用的证据。
PRS和教育程度可预测冠心病事件,且这些关联相互独立。两者均可在行为风险之外改善冠心病预测。结果表明,未获取冠心病遗传风险因素信息的观察性研究不会对教育程度与冠心病之间的关联提供有偏估计。