• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过Illumina测序确定,酶添加剂会影响紫花苜蓿青贮饲料的细菌群落。

Enzyme additives influence bacterial communities of Medicago sativa silage as determined by Illumina sequencing.

作者信息

Hu Zongfu, Ma Deying, Niu Huaxin, Chang Jie, Yu Jianhua, Tong Qing, Li Shuguo

机构信息

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, People's Republic of China.

College of Animal Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

AMB Express. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01158-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13568-020-01158-5
PMID:33409770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7788151/
Abstract

The goal of the present study was to evaluate the effects of enzymes (cellulase combined with galactosidase) and their combination with Lactobacillus plantarum (LP) on bacterial diversity in alfalfa silages using high-throughput sequencing. Alfalfa forages were treated with or without cellulase + ɑ-galactosidase (CEGA), cellulase + LP (CELP), or ɑ-galactosidase + LP (GALP). After 56 days of ensiling, all treated silages exhibited improved fermentation quality, as reflected by decreased pH, ammonium-N and increased lactic acid levels compared to the control silage (P < 0.05). Enzymatic treatment improved nutrient value by increasing crude protein levels and decreasing neutral detergent fibre (NDF) levels (P < 0.05). Silage treatment significantly altered the bacterial community, as determined by PCoA (P < 0.05). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) dominated the bacterial community of the treated silage after ensiling. The dominant bacteria changed from Garciella, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus and Pediococcus in the control silage to Lactobacillus and Pediococcus in the CEGA silage and Lactobacillus in the CELP and GALP silages. Collectively, these results suggest that treatment with both enzymes alone and in combination with inoculants greatly increased the abundance of LAB, with Enterococcus, Lactobacillus and Pediococcus observed in the silage treated with enzymes alone (CEGA) and Lactobacillus observed in the silage treated with a combination of enzymes and inoculants (CELP and GALP).

摘要

本研究的目的是利用高通量测序技术评估酶(纤维素酶与半乳糖苷酶组合)及其与植物乳杆菌(LP)的组合对苜蓿青贮饲料中细菌多样性的影响。苜蓿草料分别用或不用纤维素酶+α-半乳糖苷酶(CEGA)、纤维素酶+LP(CELP)或α-半乳糖苷酶+LP(GALP)处理。青贮56天后,与对照青贮饲料相比,所有处理的青贮饲料发酵品质均有所改善,表现为pH值、铵态氮降低,乳酸水平升高(P<0.05)。酶处理通过提高粗蛋白水平和降低中性洗涤纤维(NDF)水平提高了营养价值(P<0.05)。通过主坐标分析(PCoA)确定,青贮处理显著改变了细菌群落(P<0.05)。青贮后,乳酸菌(LAB)在处理过的青贮饲料细菌群落中占主导地位。优势细菌从对照青贮饲料中的加氏菌属、肠球菌属、乳杆菌属和片球菌属变为CEGA青贮饲料中的乳杆菌属和片球菌属,以及CELP和GALP青贮饲料中的乳杆菌属。总体而言,这些结果表明,单独使用酶以及酶与接种剂组合处理均大大增加了LAB的丰度,单独使用酶处理的青贮饲料(CEGA)中观察到肠球菌属、乳杆菌属和片球菌属,酶与接种剂组合处理的青贮饲料(CELP和GALP)中观察到乳杆菌属。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47c5/7788151/f876dd4621b8/13568_2020_1158_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47c5/7788151/449faedeeeb1/13568_2020_1158_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47c5/7788151/327856393ea5/13568_2020_1158_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47c5/7788151/9ac66efec71f/13568_2020_1158_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47c5/7788151/f876dd4621b8/13568_2020_1158_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47c5/7788151/449faedeeeb1/13568_2020_1158_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47c5/7788151/327856393ea5/13568_2020_1158_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47c5/7788151/9ac66efec71f/13568_2020_1158_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47c5/7788151/f876dd4621b8/13568_2020_1158_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Enzyme additives influence bacterial communities of Medicago sativa silage as determined by Illumina sequencing.通过Illumina测序确定,酶添加剂会影响紫花苜蓿青贮饲料的细菌群落。
AMB Express. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01158-5.
2
Bacterial Community and Fermentation Quality of Ensiling Alfalfa With Commercial Lactic Acid Bacterial Additives.添加商业乳酸菌制剂的苜蓿青贮饲料的细菌群落与发酵品质
Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 22;13:836899. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.836899. eCollection 2022.
3
Effects of inoculants and environmental temperature on fermentation quality and bacterial diversity of alfalfa silage.接种剂和环境温度对苜蓿青贮饲料发酵品质及细菌多样性的影响
Anim Sci J. 2018 Aug;89(8):1085-1092. doi: 10.1111/asj.12961. Epub 2018 May 29.
4
The Microbiota Dynamics of Alfalfa Silage During Ensiling and After Air Exposure, and the Metabolomics After Air Exposure Are Affected by and Cellulase Addition.苜蓿青贮过程中及空气暴露后的微生物群动态,以及空气暴露后的代谢组学受和纤维素酶添加的影响。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Nov 26;11:519121. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.519121. eCollection 2020.
5
Effects of ferulic acid esterase-producing and cellulase additives on the fermentation quality and microbial community of alfalfa silage.产阿魏酸酯酶和纤维素酶添加剂对苜蓿青贮发酵品质及微生物群落的影响
PeerJ. 2019 Oct 8;7:e7712. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7712. eCollection 2019.
6
Dynamics of microbial community during ensiling direct-cut alfalfa with and without LAB inoculant and sugar.添加和不添加乳酸菌接种剂及糖的直接刈割苜蓿青贮过程中微生物群落的动态变化
J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Jun;122(6):1456-1470. doi: 10.1111/jam.13456. Epub 2017 May 3.
7
Intake, digestibility, and composition of orchardgrass and alfalfa silages treated with cellulase, inoculant, and formic acid fed to lambs.用纤维素酶、接种剂和甲酸处理的果园草和苜蓿青贮饲料喂给羔羊后的摄入量、消化率和组成。
J Anim Sci. 2000 Nov;78(11):2980-9. doi: 10.2527/2000.78112980x.
8
Enzyme, bacterial inoculant, and formic acid effects on silage composition of orchardgrass and alfalfa.酶、细菌接种剂和甲酸对果园草和苜蓿青贮饲料成分的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2000 Jul;83(7):1487-502. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75021-1.
9
Effect of lactobacilli inoculation on protein and carbohydrate fractions, ensiling characteristics and bacterial community of alfalfa silage.乳酸菌接种对苜蓿青贮饲料蛋白质和碳水化合物组分、青贮特性及细菌群落的影响
Front Microbiol. 2022 Dec 5;13:1070175. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1070175. eCollection 2022.
10
Influence of Cellulase or on the Ensiling Performance and Bacterial Community in Mixed Silage of Alfalfa and .纤维素酶或[此处原文缺失内容]对苜蓿与[此处原文缺失内容]混合青贮发酵品质及细菌群落的影响
Microorganisms. 2023 Feb 8;11(2):426. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020426.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Genomics Reveals the Molecular Mechanisms of a Newly Isolated Pediococcus cellicola zy165 Strain and Its Adaptation in Corn Silage.比较基因组学揭示新分离的嗜麦芽四联球菌zy165菌株的分子机制及其在玉米青贮饲料中的适应性
Biochem Genet. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s10528-025-11114-2.
2
Effects of the fermentation quality and microbial community of waxy maize mixed with fodder soybean silage.糯玉米与饲料大豆青贮混合后的发酵品质及微生物群落效应
Front Microbiol. 2024 May 3;15:1405018. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1405018. eCollection 2024.
3
Effects of antibacterial peptide-producing , gallic acid, and cellulase on fermentation quality and bacterial community of whole-plant corn silage.

本文引用的文献

1
Community of natural lactic acid bacteria and silage fermentation of corn stover and sugarcane tops in Africa.非洲天然乳酸菌群落与玉米秸秆和甘蔗梢的青贮发酵
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020 Aug;33(8):1252-1264. doi: 10.5713/ajas.19.0348. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
2
Dynamic Succession of Microbiota during Ensiling of Whole Plant Corn Following Inoculation with and Alone or in Combination.单独或组合接种[具体菌种]后全株玉米青贮过程中微生物群的动态演替
Microorganisms. 2019 Nov 21;7(12):595. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7120595.
3
Effects of ferulic acid esterase-producing and cellulase additives on the fermentation quality and microbial community of alfalfa silage.
产抗菌肽物质、没食子酸和纤维素酶对全株玉米青贮饲料发酵品质及细菌群落的影响
Front Microbiol. 2022 Oct 17;13:1028001. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1028001. eCollection 2022.
4
Effects of Cellulase and on the Fermentation Parameters, Nutrients, and Bacterial Community in Silage.纤维素酶对青贮饲料发酵参数、养分及细菌群落的影响。 你提供的原文中“and”后面似乎缺少内容,请你检查一下,确保翻译的准确性。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 7;13:926065. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.926065. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of Lactic Acid Bacterial Inoculants on Fermentation Quality, Bacterial Community, and Mycotoxins of Alfalfa Silage under Vacuum or Nonvacuum Treatment.真空或非真空处理下乳酸菌接种剂对苜蓿青贮发酵品质、细菌群落及霉菌毒素的影响
Microorganisms. 2021 Dec 17;9(12):2614. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122614.
产阿魏酸酯酶和纤维素酶添加剂对苜蓿青贮发酵品质及微生物群落的影响
PeerJ. 2019 Oct 8;7:e7712. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7712. eCollection 2019.
4
Dynamics of microbial community and fermentation quality during ensiling of sterile and nonsterile alfalfa with or without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant.无菌和非无菌苜蓿青贮过程中添加或不添加植物乳杆菌接种剂时微生物群落动态和发酵品质。
Bioresour Technol. 2019 Mar;275:280-287. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.067. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
5
Isolation and determination of saponin hydrolysis products from Medicago sativa using supercritical fluid extraction, solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography with evaporative light scattering detection.采用超临界流体萃取、固相萃取和蒸发光散射检测的液相色谱法从紫花苜蓿中分离和测定皂甙水解产物。
J Sep Sci. 2019 Jan;42(2):465-474. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201800994. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
6
Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives.青贮评论:青贮添加剂的最新进展和未来用途。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 May;101(5):3980-4000. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13839.
7
Microbiome dynamics during ensiling of corn with and without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant.青贮过程中添加和不添加植物乳杆菌对微生物组动态的影响。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 May;102(9):4025-4037. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8903-y. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
8
Profiling of metabolome and bacterial community dynamics in ensiled Medicago sativa inoculated without or with Lactobacillus plantarum or Lactobacillus buchneri.青贮紫花苜蓿中代谢组和细菌群落动态的分析,不添加或添加植物乳杆菌或丁二酮乳酸杆菌。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 10;8(1):357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18348-0.
9
Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses additives on the microbial community and fermentation quality of soybean silage.乳酸菌和糖蜜添加剂对大豆青贮微生物群落和发酵品质的影响。
Bioresour Technol. 2017 Aug;238:706-715. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.055. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
10
Dynamics of microbial community during ensiling direct-cut alfalfa with and without LAB inoculant and sugar.添加和不添加乳酸菌接种剂及糖的直接刈割苜蓿青贮过程中微生物群落的动态变化
J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Jun;122(6):1456-1470. doi: 10.1111/jam.13456. Epub 2017 May 3.