US Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Madison, WI 53706.
Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 532 23 Skara, Sweden.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 May;101(5):3980-4000. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13839.
Additives have been available for enhancing silage preservation for decades. This review covers research studies published since 2000 that have investigated the efficacy of silage additives. The review has been divided into 6 categories of additives: homofermentative lactic acid bacteria (LAB), obligate heterofermentative LAB, combination inoculants containing obligate heterofermentative LAB plus homofermentative LAB, other inoculants, chemicals, and enzymes. The homofermentative LAB rapidly decrease pH and increase lactic acid relative to other fermentation products, although a meta-analysis indicated no reduction in pH in corn, sorghum, and sugarcane silages relative to untreated silages. These additives resulted in higher milk production according to the meta-analysis by mechanisms that are still unclear. Lactobacillus buchneri is the dominant species used in obligate heterofermentative LAB silage additives. It slowly converts lactic acid to acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol during silo storage, improving aerobic stability while having no effect on animal productivity. Current research is focused on finding other species in the Lb. buchneri group capable of producing more rapid improvements in aerobic stability. Combination inoculants aim to provide the aerobic stability benefits of Lb. buchneri with the silage fermentation efficiency and animal productivity benefits of homofermentative LAB. Research indicates that these products are improving aerobic stability, but feeding studies are not yet sufficient to make conclusions about effects on animal performance. Novel non-LAB species have been studied as potential silage inoculants. Streptococcus bovis is a potential starter species within a homofermentative LAB inoculant. Propionibacterium and Bacillus species offer improved aerobic stability in some cases. Some yeast research has focused on inhibiting molds and other detrimental silage microorganisms, whereas other yeast research suggests that it may be possible to apply a direct-fed microbial strain at ensiling, have it survive ensiling, and multiply during feed out. Chemical additives traditionally have fallen in 2 groups. Formic acid causes direct acidification, suppressing clostridia and other undesired bacteria and improving protein preservation during ensiling. On the other hand, sorbic, benzoic, propionic, and acetic acids improve silage aerobic stability at feed out through direct inhibition of yeasts and molds. Current research has focused on various combinations of these chemicals to improve both aerobic stability and animal productivity. Enzyme additives have been added to forage primarily to breakdown plant cell walls at ensiling to improve silage fermentation by providing sugars for the LAB and to enhance the nutritive value of silage by increasing the digestibility of cell walls. Cellulase or hemicellulase mixtures have been more successful at the former than the latter. A new approach focused on Lb. buchneri producing ferulic acid esterase has also had mixed success in improving the efficiency of silage digestion. Another new enzyme approach is the application of proteases to corn silage to improve starch digestibility, but more research is needed to determine the feasibility. Future silage additives are expected to directly inhibit clostridia and other detrimental microorganisms, mitigate high mycotoxin levels on harvested forages during ensiling, enhance aerobic stability, improve cell wall digestibility, increase the efficiency of utilization of silage nitrogen by cattle, and increase the availability of starch to cattle.
几十年来,添加剂一直被用于增强青贮饲料的保存。本综述涵盖了自 2000 年以来发表的研究,这些研究调查了青贮添加剂的功效。综述分为 6 类添加剂:同质发酵乳酸细菌(LAB)、需氧发酵乳酸细菌、含有需氧发酵乳酸细菌和同质发酵乳酸细菌的组合接种剂、其他接种剂、化学物质和酶。同质发酵乳酸细菌可迅速降低 pH 值并增加乳酸相对于其他发酵产物的含量,尽管荟萃分析表明,与未处理的青贮饲料相比,玉米、高粱和甘蔗青贮饲料的 pH 值没有降低。这些添加剂通过仍不清楚的机制导致更高的牛奶产量。在需氧发酵乳酸细菌青贮添加剂中,主要使用乳酸乳球菌。它在青贮储存过程中缓慢地将乳酸转化为乙酸和 1,2-丙二醇,提高了有氧稳定性,而对动物生产性能没有影响。目前的研究集中于寻找 Lb. buchneri 组中能够更快提高有氧稳定性的其他物种。组合接种剂旨在提供乳酸乳球菌的有氧稳定性益处,以及同质发酵乳酸细菌的青贮发酵效率和动物生产性能益处。研究表明,这些产品正在提高有氧稳定性,但喂养研究还不足以得出关于对动物性能影响的结论。新型非 LAB 物种已被研究为潜在的青贮接种剂。牛链球菌是同质发酵乳酸细菌接种剂中一种潜在的起始物种。丙酸杆菌和芽孢杆菌在某些情况下提供了更好的有氧稳定性。一些酵母研究集中于抑制霉菌和其他青贮有害微生物,而其他酵母研究表明,有可能在青贮时添加直接饲喂微生物菌株,使其在青贮过程中存活并在饲料中繁殖。化学添加剂传统上分为两类。甲酸直接酸化,抑制梭菌和其他不良细菌,并在青贮过程中提高蛋白质保存。另一方面,山梨酸、苯甲酸、丙酸和乙酸通过直接抑制酵母和霉菌来提高青贮饲料的有氧稳定性。目前的研究集中于这些化学物质的各种组合,以提高有氧稳定性和动物生产性能。酶添加剂主要添加到饲料中以在青贮时分解植物细胞壁,通过为 LAB 提供糖来改善青贮发酵,并通过增加细胞壁的消化率来提高青贮饲料的营养价值。纤维素酶或半纤维素酶混合物在前者方面比后者更成功。一种新的方法集中在 Lb. buchneri 产生阿魏酸酯酶上,在提高青贮饲料消化效率方面也取得了喜忧参半的效果。另一种新的酶方法是在玉米青贮饲料中应用蛋白酶来提高淀粉消化率,但需要进一步研究以确定其可行性。未来的青贮添加剂有望直接抑制梭菌和其他有害微生物,减轻青贮过程中收获饲料中高霉菌毒素水平的影响,提高有氧稳定性,提高细胞壁消化率,提高牛对青贮饲料氮的利用率,并增加牛对淀粉的利用率。