• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Omega 环胃空肠旁路术(OLGIBP/SAGI)与单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB):中期结果。

Omega Loop Gastroileal Bypass (OLGIBP/SAGI) Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): Medium-Term Results.

机构信息

Department of Bariatric Surgery, CHU Felix-Guyon, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France.

University of La Réunion, UFR santé, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2021 Apr;31(4):1597-1602. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05165-0. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-05165-0
PMID:33409980
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In bariatric surgery, new surgical techniques are continually being developed. The one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become increasingly common since 2001. However, some patients experience bile reflux or excessive weight loss. This study aimed to assess a new bariatric procedure designed to avoid some of the drawbacks of conventional OAGB.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To lower the complication rate and pathophysiological impact after OAGB, we performed an omega loop gastroileal bypass (OLGIBP/SAGI) with a 300-cm common limb. We compared this technique with OAGB.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients underwent OLGIBP and 23 underwent OAGB. Mean operative time was 108 min for OLGIBP vs 103 min for OAGB. The mean hospital length of stay was 3 days (1 to 7). No complications related to the gastroenterostomy occurred. At 3 years, among OAGB patients, there were 5 (21.7%) cases of bile reflux including 2 (8.7%) requiring a revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Among OLGIBP patients, there were 3 (17.6%) cases of bile reflux 1 (5.9%) requiring a revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. There was no albumin deficiency. At 3 years, % of total weight loss (TWL) was 43.6 + - 6.2 in the OAGB group vs 48.2 + - 7.4 in the OLGIBP group.

CONCLUSIONS

The bariatric and metabolic outcomes of OLGIBP are expected to be similar to those of OAGB. The OLGIBP technique should reduce the risks of malnutrition and bile reflux. The two techniques can be safely performed and offer alternatives in bariatric surgery.

摘要

简介

在减重手术中,新的手术技术不断得到发展。自 2001 年以来,一吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)变得越来越普遍。然而,一些患者会出现胆汁反流或体重过度减轻的情况。本研究旨在评估一种新的减重手术,旨在避免传统 OAGB 的一些缺点。

材料和方法

为了降低 OAGB 后的并发症发生率和病理生理学影响,我们采用 300cm 共同支襻进行了 omega 环胃空肠旁路术(OLGIBP/SAGI)。我们将这种技术与 OAGB 进行了比较。

结果

17 例患者接受了 OLGIBP,23 例患者接受了 OAGB。OLGIBP 的平均手术时间为 108 分钟,OAGB 为 103 分钟。平均住院时间为 3 天(1 至 7 天)。没有发生与胃肠吻合口相关的并发症。在 3 年时,OAGB 患者中有 5 例(21.7%)出现胆汁反流,其中 2 例(8.7%)需要改为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术。OLGIBP 患者中有 3 例(17.6%)出现胆汁反流,其中 1 例(5.9%)需要改为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术。没有白蛋白缺乏症。在 3 年时,OAGB 组的总体重减轻百分比(TWL)为 43.6±6.2%,OLGIBP 组为 48.2±7.4%。

结论

OLGIBP 的减重和代谢效果预计与 OAGB 相似。OLGIBP 技术应降低营养不良和胆汁反流的风险。这两种技术都可以安全地进行,并为减重手术提供了替代方案。

相似文献

1
Omega Loop Gastroileal Bypass (OLGIBP/SAGI) Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): Medium-Term Results.Omega 环胃空肠旁路术(OLGIBP/SAGI)与单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB):中期结果。
Obes Surg. 2021 Apr;31(4):1597-1602. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05165-0. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
Randomized Controlled Trial of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: Comparison of the YOMEGA and Taiwan Studies.随机对照试验比较 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass 与 Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass 治疗肥胖症:YOMEGA 研究与台湾研究的比较。
Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):3047-3053. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04065-2.
3
Comparison of the Bile Reflux Frequency in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Cohort Study.一种吻合术胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术胆汁反流频率的比较:一项队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jun;29(6):1721-1725. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03683-6.
4
Conversion of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) for Biliary Reflux Resistant to Medical Treatment: Lessons Learned from a Retrospective Series of 2780 Consecutive Patients Undergoing OAGB.将单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)转为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)治疗药物难治性胆反流:来自 2780 例连续 OAGB 患者回顾性系列的经验教训。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jun;30(6):2093-2098. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04460-0.
5
Conversion from one-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: when and why-a single-center experience of all consecutive OAGB procedures.从单吻合口胃旁路术到 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的转换:何时以及为何——一项单中心所有连续 OAGB 手术的经验。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Feb;18(2):225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.10.019. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
6
The IFSO Worldwide One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Survey: Techniques and Outcomes?IFSO 全球单吻合口胃旁路手术调查:技术与结果?
Obes Surg. 2021 Apr;31(4):1411-1421. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05249-5. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
7
One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery.单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗限制型减重手术后减重不足和体重反弹
Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3287-3294. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04536-x.
8
Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.一种吻合胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的疗效和安全性比较(YOMEGA):一项多中心、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 30;393(10178):1299-1309. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
9
Laparoscopic Conversion of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to a Standard Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.腹腔镜下将单吻合口胃旁路术转换为标准 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术
Obes Surg. 2017 May;27(5):1398. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2646-1.
10
One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized trial.单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:一项 5 年随访前瞻性随机试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Feb;406(1):171-179. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01949-1. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Letter to the Editor-Modified One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Following Sleeve Gastrectomy for Severe Reflux and Delayed Gastric Emptying: A Prospective Trial with Clinical and Physiological Outcome Measures.致编辑的信——袖状胃切除术后因严重反流和胃排空延迟行改良单吻合口胃旁路术:一项具有临床和生理结局指标的前瞻性试验
Obes Surg. 2024 Nov;34(11):4284-4285. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07520-x. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
2
The length of the biliopancreatic limb in one anastomosis gastric bypass.单吻合口胃旁路术中胆胰支的长度
Front Surg. 2024 Aug 14;11:1248744. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1248744. eCollection 2024.
3
Revision/Conversion Surgeries After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-An Experts' Modified Delphi Consensus.

本文引用的文献

1
Mini-gastric bypass controversy.迷你胃旁路手术争议
Obes Surg. 2001 Dec;11(6):773-7. doi: 10.1381/09608920160558777.
单吻合口胃旁路术后的修正/转换术:专家改良 Delphi 共识。
Obes Surg. 2024 Jul;34(7):2399-2410. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07345-8. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
4
Prevention of malnutrition after one anastomosis gastric bypass: value of the common channel limb length.一吻合胃旁路术后预防营养不良:共同通道长度的价值。
BMC Surg. 2024 May 16;24(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02438-8.
5
Does One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Expose Patients to Gastroesophageal Reflux: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.单吻合胃旁路术是否使患者面临胃食管反流:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2023 Dec;33(12):4080-4102. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06866-y. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
6
[Anastomotic techniques in minimally invasive bariatric surgery].[微创减重手术中的吻合技术]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Sep;94(9):768-774. doi: 10.1007/s00104-023-01907-9. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
7
Bile reflux after one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery: A review study.单吻合口胃旁路手术后的胆汁反流:一项综述研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Mar 26;64:102248. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102248. eCollection 2021 Apr.