Department of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Department of Kidney Disease and Hypertension, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2021 May;25(5):456-466. doi: 10.1007/s10157-020-02005-4. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
There is no evidence regarding appropriate target hemoglobin levels in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-hyporesponsiveness. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study in non-dialysis dependent CKD (NDD-CKD) patients with ESA-hyporesponsiveness, comparing results of intensive versus conservative treatment to maintain hemoglobin levels.
This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study conducted at 89 institutions. Among NDD-CKD patients, those with ESA-hyporesponsive renal anemia were randomly assigned to an intensive treatment group, to which epoetin beta pegol was administered with target hemoglobin level of 11 g/dL or higher, or conservative treatment group, in which the hemoglobin levels at enrollment (within ± 1 g/dL) were maintained. The primary endpoint was the time to the first kidney composite event defined as (1) transition to renal replacement therapy (dialysis or renal transplantation); (2) reduction of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to less than 6.0 mL/min/1.73 m; or (3) reduction of eGFR by 30% or more. Secondary endpoints were kidney function (change rate in eGFR), cardiovascular (CV) events, and safety.
Between August 2012 and December 2015, 385 patients were registered, and 362 patients who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled. There was no significant difference in kidney survival or in CV events between the two groups. However, the incidences of the 3 types of kidney composite events tended to differ.
In NDD-CKD patients with ESA-hyporesponsive renal anemia, the aggressive administration of ESA did not clearly extend kidney survival or result in a significant difference in the incidence of CV events.
对于红细胞生成刺激剂(ESA)低反应性的慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者,目前尚无关于合适的目标血红蛋白水平的证据。因此,我们在非透析依赖性 CKD(NDD-CKD)患者中进行了一项 ESA 低反应性的随机对照研究,比较了强化与保守治疗以维持血红蛋白水平的结果。
这是一项在 89 家机构进行的多中心、开放标签、随机、平行组研究。在 NDD-CKD 患者中,那些 ESA 低反应性肾性贫血的患者被随机分配到强化治疗组,给予培促红素β Pegol,目标血红蛋白水平为 11g/dL 或更高,或保守治疗组,在该组中,血红蛋白水平在入组时(±1g/dL 内)保持不变。主要终点是首次肾脏复合事件的时间,定义为(1)过渡到肾脏替代治疗(透析或肾移植);(2)估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)降低至 6.0ml/min/1.73m 以下;或(3)eGFR 降低 30%或更多。次要终点是肾功能(eGFR 变化率)、心血管(CV)事件和安全性。
2012 年 8 月至 2015 年 12 月,共登记了 385 例患者,符合入选标准的 362 例患者被纳入研究。两组间肾脏生存率或 CV 事件无显著差异。然而,3 种类型的肾脏复合事件的发生率有差异。
在 ESA 低反应性肾性贫血的 NDD-CKD 患者中,积极使用 ESA 并不能明显延长肾脏生存率,也不能显著降低 CV 事件的发生率。