Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Cephalalgia. 2021 May;41(6):711-720. doi: 10.1177/0333102420981721. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
The evaluation of red flags is crucial for the accurate the diagnosis of headache disorders, especially for thunderclap headache. We analysed if secondary headache disorders were adequately ruled out in patients that presented to the emergency room with thunderclap headache.
In this retrospective cohort study, we screened all patients that visited the emergency room for headache, including those that described thunderclap headache. We measured the frequency with which secondary causes were not adequately ruled out. We analysed the order of the exams, the final diagnosis, and the time elapsed between arrival, initial request for imaging, and the completion of the imaging.
We screened 2132 patients, and 42 (1.9%) fulfilled eligibility criteria. Mean age was 43.1 ± 17.1 years, and 57% of patients were female. For 22 (52.4%) patients, the work-up was incomplete. Vascular study was missing in 16 (38.1%) patients, cerebrospinal fluid evaluation in nine (21.4%), and magnetic resonance imaging in seven (16.7%), with multiple assessments missing in six (14.3%). There were ten different combinations in which the exams were performed, with the most frequent being the second exam's cerebral spinal fluid evaluation in 18 (52.9%) and the computed tomography angiogram in 10 (29.4%). A secondary cause of thunderclap headache was found in 16 (38.1%) patients, and four (9.5%) had a primary headache diagnosis after an adequate and complete study.
Thunderclap onset was described in one of every 50 patients that visited the emergency room for headache. More than half of these patients were not adequately managed. More than a third of thunderclap headache patients had a secondary cause.
评估警示症状对于准确诊断头痛障碍至关重要,尤其是对于霹雳性头痛。我们分析了在因霹雳性头痛到急诊就诊的患者中,是否充分排除了继发性头痛障碍。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们筛选了所有因头痛就诊急诊的患者,包括那些描述为霹雳性头痛的患者。我们测量了未充分排除继发性病因的频率。我们分析了检查的顺序、最终诊断以及到达、最初请求进行影像学检查和完成影像学检查之间的时间间隔。
我们筛选了 2132 名患者,其中 42 名(1.9%)符合入选标准。平均年龄为 43.1±17.1 岁,57%的患者为女性。对于 22 名(52.4%)患者,检查不完整。16 名(38.1%)患者缺少血管研究,9 名(21.4%)患者缺少脑脊液评估,7 名(16.7%)患者缺少磁共振成像,6 名(14.3%)患者缺少多项评估。有十种不同的检查组合方式,最常见的是第二次检查的脑脊液评估,有 18 例(52.9%),其次是计算机断层血管造影,有 10 例(29.4%)。16 名(38.1%)霹雳性头痛患者发现了继发性病因,4 名(9.5%)患者在进行充分和完整的研究后被诊断为原发性头痛。
在因头痛到急诊就诊的患者中,每 50 名患者中就有 1 名患者出现霹雳性头痛发作。这些患者中超过一半未得到充分管理。超过三分之一的霹雳性头痛患者有继发性病因。