Fundació Salut i Envelliment UAB. Casa Convalescència, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 17, 4a planta, 08041, Barcelona, Spain.
Institute of Biomedical Research (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Quintí, 75-77, 08041, Barcelona, Spain.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10094-9.
Evidence is scarce on how to promote health and decrease cumulative inequalities for disadvantaged older people. Downstream complex interventions focusing on intermediate factors (self-management, health literacy and social capital) may have the potential to mitigate the inequitable impacts of social determinants in health. The aim of the AEQUALIS study was to assess the effectiveness of a group-based intervention to improve self-perceived health as indicator of health inequality.
Pragmatic randomised clinical trial addressed to older adults (≥ 60 years) living in urban disadvantaged areas with low self-perceived health. The intervention was delivered in primary care settings and community assets between 2015 and 2017 and consisted in 12 weekly sessions. The primary outcome was self-perceived health assessed in two ways: with the first item of the SF-12 questionnaire, and with the EQ-5D visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, social capital, self-management, mental health and use of health services. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post intervention and follow-up at 9 months after the end of the intervention.
390 people were allocated to the intervention group (IG) or the control group (CG) and 194 participants and 164 were included in the data analysis, respectively. Self perceived health as primary outcome assessed with SF-12-1 was not specifically affected by the intervention, but with the EQ-5D visual analog scale showed a significant increase at one-year follow-up only in the IG (MD=4.80, 95%CI [1.09, 8.52]). IG group improved health literacy in terms of a better understanding of medical information (- 0.62 [- 1.10, - 0.13]). The mental component of SF-12 improved (3.77 [1.82, 5.73]), and depressive symptoms decreased at post-intervention (- 1.26 [- 1.90, - 0.63]), and at follow-up (- 0.95 [- 1.62, - 0.27]). The use of antidepressants increased in CG at the follow-up (1.59 [0.33, 2.86]), while it remained stable in the IG.
This study indicates that a group intervention with a strong social component, conducted in primary health care and community assets, shows promising effects on mental health and can be used as a strategy for health promotion among older adults in urban disadvantaged areas.
ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02733523 . Registered 11 April 2016 - Retrospectively registered.
关于如何促进弱势老年人的健康和减少累积不平等,证据很少。下游的复杂干预措施侧重于中间因素(自我管理、健康素养和社会资本),可能有潜力减轻健康方面社会决定因素的不平等影响。AEQUALIS 研究的目的是评估以改善自我感知健康为健康不平等指标的基于小组的干预措施的有效性。
这是一项针对生活在城市弱势地区、自我感知健康状况较差的老年人(≥60 岁)的实用随机临床试验。该干预措施在初级保健环境和社区资产中进行,时间为 2015 年至 2017 年,共 12 周。主要结局是自我感知健康,通过 SF-12 问卷的第一项和 EQ-5D 视觉模拟量表两种方式进行评估。次要结局是健康相关生活质量、社会资本、自我管理、心理健康和卫生服务利用。在基线、干预后和干预结束后 9 个月的随访时评估结局。
390 人被分配到干预组(IG)或对照组(CG),194 名参与者和 164 名参与者分别被纳入数据分析。作为主要结局的自我感知健康,用 SF-12-1 评估,并没有受到干预的特别影响,但用 EQ-5D 视觉模拟量表在一年随访时仅在 IG 中显示出显著增加(MD=4.80,95%CI [1.09,8.52])。IG 组在医疗信息理解方面的健康素养得到提高(-0.62 [-1.10,-0.13])。SF-12 的心理成分也得到了改善(3.77 [1.82,5.73]),抑郁症状在干预后(-1.26 [-1.90,-0.63])和随访时(-0.95 [-1.62,-0.27])也有所下降。在 CG 中,在随访时抗抑郁药的使用增加(1.59 [0.33,2.86]),而 IG 中则保持稳定。
这项研究表明,在初级卫生保健和社区资产中开展的、具有强大社会组成部分的小组干预措施,对心理健康有积极的影响,并可作为促进城市弱势地区老年人健康的一项策略。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02733523。2016 年 4 月 11 日注册-回顾性注册。