Aging Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Feb;66(2):263-273. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15173. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
To compare the effect of a 6-month community-based intervention with that of usual care on quality of life, depressive symptoms, anxiety, self-efficacy, self-management, and healthcare costs in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and 2 or more comorbidities.
Multisite, single-blind, parallel, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.
Four communities in Ontario, Canada.
Community-dwelling older adults (≥65) with T2DM and 2 or more comorbidities randomized into intervention (n = 80) and control (n = 79) groups (N = 159).
Client-driven, customized self-management program with up to 3 in-home visits from a registered nurse or registered dietitian, a monthly group wellness program, monthly provider team case conferences, and care coordination and system navigation.
Quality-of-life measures included the Physical Component Summary (PCS, primary outcome) and Mental Component Summary (MCS, secondary outcome) scores of the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Other secondary outcome measures were the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10), Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease, and healthcare costs.
Morbidity burden was high (average of eight comorbidities). Intention-to-treat analyses using analysis of covariance showed a group difference favoring the intervention for the MCS (mean difference = 2.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.28-5.09, P = .03), SDSCA (mean difference = 3.79, 95% CI = 1.02-6.56, P = .01), and CES-D-10 (mean difference = -1.45, 95% CI = -0.13 to -2.76, P = .03). No group differences were seen in PCS score, anxiety, self-efficacy, or total healthcare costs.
Participation in a 6-month community-based intervention improved quality of life and self-management and reduced depressive symptoms in older adults with T2DM and comorbidity without increasing total healthcare costs.
比较基于社区的 6 个月干预与常规护理对 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)合并 2 种及以上合并症的老年人生活质量、抑郁症状、焦虑、自我效能、自我管理和医疗保健费用的影响。
多地点、单盲、平行、实用、随机对照试验。
加拿大安大略省的 4 个社区。
纳入社区居住的 T2DM 合并 2 种及以上合并症的老年人(≥65 岁),随机分为干预组(n=80)和对照组(n=79)(n=159)。
以客户为导向、定制的自我管理计划,最多可接受注册护士或注册营养师上门 3 次、每月参加小组健康计划、每月进行一次医疗团队病例会议以及进行护理协调和系统导航。
生活质量测量包括医疗结果研究 12 项简明健康调查(SF-12)的身体成分摘要(PCS,主要结果)和精神成分摘要(MCS,次要结果)评分。其他次要结果测量包括广泛性焦虑症量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D-10)、糖尿病自我管理活动综述(SDSCA)、管理慢性疾病的自我效能以及医疗保健费用。
发病率负担很高(平均合并症 8 种)。使用协方差分析的意向治疗分析显示,干预组在 MCS(平均差异=2.68,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.28-5.09,P=0.03)、SDSCA(平均差异=3.79,95%CI 为 1.02-6.56,P=0.01)和 CES-D-10(平均差异=-1.45,95%CI 为-0.13 至-2.76,P=0.03)方面的表现优于对照组。在 PCS 评分、焦虑、自我效能或总医疗保健费用方面,两组之间没有差异。
参与为期 6 个月的基于社区的干预措施可改善 2 型糖尿病合并症患者的生活质量和自我管理,并减轻抑郁症状,而不会增加总医疗保健费用。