Suppr超能文献

社区项目改善患有糖尿病和合并症的老年患者的生活质量和自我管理。

Community Program Improves Quality of Life and Self-Management in Older Adults with Diabetes Mellitus and Comorbidity.

机构信息

Aging Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Feb;66(2):263-273. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15173. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of a 6-month community-based intervention with that of usual care on quality of life, depressive symptoms, anxiety, self-efficacy, self-management, and healthcare costs in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and 2 or more comorbidities.

DESIGN

Multisite, single-blind, parallel, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Four communities in Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling older adults (≥65) with T2DM and 2 or more comorbidities randomized into intervention (n = 80) and control (n = 79) groups (N = 159).

INTERVENTION

Client-driven, customized self-management program with up to 3 in-home visits from a registered nurse or registered dietitian, a monthly group wellness program, monthly provider team case conferences, and care coordination and system navigation.

MEASUREMENTS

Quality-of-life measures included the Physical Component Summary (PCS, primary outcome) and Mental Component Summary (MCS, secondary outcome) scores of the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Other secondary outcome measures were the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10), Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease, and healthcare costs.

RESULTS

Morbidity burden was high (average of eight comorbidities). Intention-to-treat analyses using analysis of covariance showed a group difference favoring the intervention for the MCS (mean difference = 2.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.28-5.09, P = .03), SDSCA (mean difference = 3.79, 95% CI = 1.02-6.56, P = .01), and CES-D-10 (mean difference = -1.45, 95% CI = -0.13 to -2.76, P = .03). No group differences were seen in PCS score, anxiety, self-efficacy, or total healthcare costs.

CONCLUSION

Participation in a 6-month community-based intervention improved quality of life and self-management and reduced depressive symptoms in older adults with T2DM and comorbidity without increasing total healthcare costs.

摘要

目的

比较基于社区的 6 个月干预与常规护理对 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)合并 2 种及以上合并症的老年人生活质量、抑郁症状、焦虑、自我效能、自我管理和医疗保健费用的影响。

设计

多地点、单盲、平行、实用、随机对照试验。

地点

加拿大安大略省的 4 个社区。

参与者

纳入社区居住的 T2DM 合并 2 种及以上合并症的老年人(≥65 岁),随机分为干预组(n=80)和对照组(n=79)(n=159)。

干预

以客户为导向、定制的自我管理计划,最多可接受注册护士或注册营养师上门 3 次、每月参加小组健康计划、每月进行一次医疗团队病例会议以及进行护理协调和系统导航。

测量

生活质量测量包括医疗结果研究 12 项简明健康调查(SF-12)的身体成分摘要(PCS,主要结果)和精神成分摘要(MCS,次要结果)评分。其他次要结果测量包括广泛性焦虑症量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D-10)、糖尿病自我管理活动综述(SDSCA)、管理慢性疾病的自我效能以及医疗保健费用。

结果

发病率负担很高(平均合并症 8 种)。使用协方差分析的意向治疗分析显示,干预组在 MCS(平均差异=2.68,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.28-5.09,P=0.03)、SDSCA(平均差异=3.79,95%CI 为 1.02-6.56,P=0.01)和 CES-D-10(平均差异=-1.45,95%CI 为-0.13 至-2.76,P=0.03)方面的表现优于对照组。在 PCS 评分、焦虑、自我效能或总医疗保健费用方面,两组之间没有差异。

结论

参与为期 6 个月的基于社区的干预措施可改善 2 型糖尿病合并症患者的生活质量和自我管理,并减轻抑郁症状,而不会增加总医疗保健费用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/445c/5836873/c535117835cb/JGS-66-263-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验