• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

能力建设促进大规模变革:国家方案评估的经验教训

Capability building for large-scale transformational change: learning from an evaluation of a national programme.

机构信息

Improvement Capability Building and Delivery Group, NHS England, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK

Improvement Capability Building and Delivery Group, NHS England, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000980.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000980
PMID:33414252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7797252/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Long Term Plan presents an ambitious vision for England's National Health Service which will require a sustained programme of transformational change. The Virtual Academy of Large-Scale Change (VALSC) was developed to build capability in health and care system teams involved in transformation or redesign programmes.

METHODS

To evaluate the VALSC, quantitative and qualitative data were collected and reviewed against the Kirkpatrick model. Quantitative data were collected via end-of-session surveys to assess individual knowledge before and after participating in capability-building interventions. Qualitative data were also collected and included post-intervention surveys and interviews. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using an inductive approach to identify themes that were subsequently assessed against the Kirkpatrick model.

RESULTS

Results suggest that the VALSC programme has helped build capability for large-scale change in terms of learning, behaviour change and impact. Participants' ipsative self-assessment of knowledge demonstrated a significant change (p<0.001) and qualitative data suggested three broad themes in which the VALSC made an impact. First, participants were empowered with transformation and change skills which they applied to local health and care challenges. Second, VALSC helped strengthen connections within and between transformational change teams. Third, VALSC helped transformational change teams to engage more effectively with their stakeholders.

CONCLUSIONS

The VALSC developed knowledge, skills, behavioural change and application impact that built capability in individuals and teams. Therefore, continuing to develop capability-building offers that empower and build agency in front-line staff working on service transformation and equip them with approaches, methods and tools to increase their chances of success, is recommended.

摘要

背景

《长期计划》为英格兰国民保健制度提出了一个雄心勃勃的愿景,这将需要一个持续的变革计划。虚拟大规模变革学院(VALSC)的成立是为了培养参与转型或重新设计项目的卫生和医疗保健系统团队的能力。

方法

为了评估 VALSC,收集了定量和定性数据,并根据柯克帕特里克模型进行了审查。定量数据通过课程结束时的调查收集,以评估个人在参与能力建设干预措施前后的知识。还收集了定性数据,包括干预后的调查和访谈。访谈记录并使用归纳方法进行分析,以确定主题,然后根据柯克帕特里克模型进行评估。

结果

结果表明,VALSC 计划在学习、行为改变和影响方面帮助建立了大规模变革的能力。参与者对知识的主观自我评估表明发生了显著变化(p<0.001),定性数据表明 VALSC 产生影响的三个主题。首先,参与者获得了转型和变革技能,将其应用于当地的卫生和医疗保健挑战。其次,VALSC 有助于加强转型变革团队内部和之间的联系。第三,VALSC 帮助转型变革团队更有效地与利益相关者接触。

结论

VALSC 培养了个人和团队的知识、技能、行为改变和应用影响,从而增强了能力。因此,建议继续开发赋能和培养一线工作人员在服务转型方面的机构,并为他们提供方法、方法和工具,以增加他们成功的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f949/7797252/59f24afe3024/bmjoq-2020-000980f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f949/7797252/64e2b16b9173/bmjoq-2020-000980f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f949/7797252/59f24afe3024/bmjoq-2020-000980f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f949/7797252/64e2b16b9173/bmjoq-2020-000980f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f949/7797252/59f24afe3024/bmjoq-2020-000980f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Capability building for large-scale transformational change: learning from an evaluation of a national programme.能力建设促进大规模变革:国家方案评估的经验教训
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000980.
2
Group cognitive-behavioural programme to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis fatigue: the RAFT RCT with economic and qualitative evaluations.群组认知行为方案对减轻类风湿关节炎疲劳的影响:RAFT RCT 伴有经济和定性评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(57):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta23570.
3
Building lean improvement sckills at scale: an evaluation of a massive open online course in the English NHS.规模化构建精益改进技能:英国国民保健制度大规模开放式在线课程评估。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Oct;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002357.
4
Driving quality improvement with a massive open online course (MOOC).利用大规模开放在线课程(MOOC)提高教学质量。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Mar;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000781.
5
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
6
Building a clinical leadership community to drive improvement: a multi-case educational study to inform 21st century clinical commissioning, professional capability and patient care.建立临床领导力社区以推动改进:一项多案例教育研究,为21世纪的临床委托、专业能力和患者护理提供信息。
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Jan;24(1):22-8. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11493451.
7
Telling the story of complex change: an Impact Framework for the real world.讲述复杂变革的故事:一个适用于现实世界的影响框架。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jul 3;33(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab090.
8
9
Dying with dignity in America: the transformational leadership of Florence Wald.美国的有尊严的死亡:佛罗伦萨·沃尔德的变革型领导。
J Prof Nurs. 2010 Mar;26(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.12.009.
10
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming improvement training at scale with essential digital training skills.运用基本数字培训技能大规模变革改进培训。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Aug 18;14(3):e003224. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003224.
2
Building lean improvement sckills at scale: an evaluation of a massive open online course in the English NHS.规模化构建精益改进技能:英国国民保健制度大规模开放式在线课程评估。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Oct;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002357.
3
Exploring managers' response to a quality and safety leadership intervention: findings from a multiple case study in Norwegian nursing homes and homecare services.

本文引用的文献

1
Fourteen years of quality improvement education in healthcare: a utilisation-focused evaluation using concept mapping.医疗保健领域十四年的质量改进教育:一项使用概念图的以利用为重点的评估。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Dec 13;8(4):e000795. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000795. eCollection 2019.
2
: a grounded theory of how to achieve large-scale, sustained change, co-created with improvement organisations across the UK.一种与英国各地的改进组织共同创建的关于如何实现大规模、持续变革的扎根理论。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jun 14;8(2):e000553. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000553. eCollection 2019.
3
Self-reported and objectively assessed knowledge of evidence-based practice terminology among healthcare students: A cross-sectional study.
探索管理者对质量和安全领导力干预的反应:挪威疗养院和家庭护理服务中多案例研究的结果。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Aug;10(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001494.
4
Operations management on the front line of COVID-19 vaccination: building capability at scale via technology-enhanced learning.新冠疫情疫苗接种一线的运营管理:通过技术增强型学习实现大规模能力建设。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Jul;10(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001372.
自我报告和客观评估医疗保健学生对循证实践术语的了解:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 12;13(7):e0200313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200313. eCollection 2018.
4
Conceptualizing and assessing improvement capability: a review.概念化与评估改进能力:综述
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(5):604-611. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx088.
5
Evaluating investment in quality improvement capacity building: a systematic review.评估质量改进能力建设的投资:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 20;7(2):e012431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012431.
6
Transformational change in healthcare: an examination of four case studies.医疗保健领域的变革性变化:四个案例研究剖析
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Apr;40(2):163-167. doi: 10.1071/AH15041.
7
Frameworks for change in healthcare organisations: a formative evaluation of the NHS Change Model.医疗保健组织的变革框架:对英国国家医疗服务体系变革模式的形成性评估
Health Serv Manage Res. 2013 Aug;26(2-3):65-75. doi: 10.1177/0951484813511233.
8
Measuring bias in self-reported data.测量自我报告数据中的偏差。
Int J Behav Healthc Res. 2011 Oct;2(4):320-332. doi: 10.1504/IJBHR.2011.043414.
9
Recommendations for evaluation of health care improvement initiatives.医疗保健改进举措评估建议。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.007.
10
Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study.内容分析和主题分析:对开展定性描述性研究的启示。
Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048. Epub 2013 Mar 11.