Tauber Rachel N, Camic Clayton L, Zhang Shuqi, Chomentowski Peter J
Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Dec 1;13(4):1595-1604. doi: 10.70252/LMVI3697. eCollection 2020.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of whole body percent fat (%BF) and segmental fat-free mass (FFM) using multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MF-BIA) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in college-aged adults. Sixty-two participants male ( = 32) and female ( 30) completed MF-BIA and DEXA measurements following established pre-test guidelines. %BF and segmental FFM (right arm, left arm, trunk, right leg, and left leg) were collected and analyzed. The MF-BIA significantly ( 0.05) underestimated %BF for all participants, females, and males compared to DEXA. In addition, MF-BIA significantly ( 0.05) underestimated FFM in the arms and legs in all participants and males with the exception of the left arm in all subjects while significantly overestimating FFM in the trunk. In females, the MF-BIA overestimated FFM in the arms and trunk while significantly ( 0.05) underestimating FFM in the legs. Difference plots also indicated that the underestimation of FFM from MF-BIA in the arms and legs increased as the amount of FFM increased. Thus, our findings suggested that the MF-BIA may not be accurate for measuring whole %BF and segmental FFM in the college-aged population.
本研究的目的是评估在大学生年龄段成年人中,使用多频生物电阻抗分析(MF-BIA)和双能X线吸收法(DEXA)测量全身脂肪百分比(%BF)和各部位去脂体重(FFM)的有效性。62名参与者(男性32名,女性30名)按照既定的预测试指南完成了MF-BIA和DEXA测量。收集并分析了%BF和各部位FFM(右臂、左臂、躯干、右腿和左腿)的数据。与DEXA相比,MF-BIA显著(P<0.05)低估了所有参与者、女性和男性的%BF。此外,除了所有受试者的左臂外,MF-BIA显著(P<0.05)低估了所有参与者和男性手臂和腿部的FFM,同时显著高估了躯干的FFM。在女性中,MF-BIA高估了手臂和躯干的FFM,而显著(P<0.05)低估了腿部的FFM。差异图还表明,随着FFM量的增加,MF-BIA对手臂和腿部FFM的低估也增加。因此,我们的研究结果表明,MF-BIA在测量大学生年龄段人群的全身%BF和各部位FFM时可能不准确。