Department of Pathology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Woodland Hills Medical Center, 5601 De Soto Avenue Woodland Hills, CA, 91364, Woodland Hills, USA.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnostic Sciences, University of Florida College of Dentistry, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Head Neck Pathol. 2021 Jun;15(2):572-587. doi: 10.1007/s12105-020-01262-9. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
The many diverse terms used to describe the wide spectrum of changes seen in proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL) have resulted in disparate clinical management. The objective of this study was to produce an expert consensus guideline for standardized assessment and reporting by pathologists diagnosing PVL related lesions. 299 biopsies from 84 PVL patients from six institutions were selected from patients who had multifocal oral leukoplakic lesions identified over several years (a minimum follow-up period of 36 months). The lesions demonstrated the spectrum of histologic features described in PVL, and in some cases, patients developed oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). An expert working group of oral and maxillofacial and head and neck pathologists reviewed microscopic features in a rigorous fashion, in combination with review of clinical photographs when available. The working group then selected 43 single slide biopsy cases for whole slide digital imaging (WSI) review by members of the consensus conference. The digital images were then reviewed in two surveys separated by a washout period of at least 90 days. Five non-PVL histologic mimics were included as controls. Cases were re-evaluated during a consensus conference with 19 members reporting on the cases. The best inter-observer diagnostic agreement relative to PVL lesions were classified as "corrugated ortho(para)hyperkeratotic lesion, not reactive" and "SCC" (chi-square p = 0.015). There was less than moderate agreement (kappa < 0.60) for lesions in the "Bulky hyperkeratotic epithelial proliferation, not reactive" category. There was ≥ moderate agreement (> 0.41 kappa) for 35 of 48 cases. This expert consensus guideline has been developed with support and endorsement from the leadership of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and the North American Society of Head and Neck Pathologists to recommend the use of standardized histopathologic criteria and descriptive terminology to indicate three categories of lesions within PVL: (1) "corrugated ortho(para)hyperkeratotic lesion, not reactive;" (2) "bulky hyperkeratotic epithelial proliferation, not reactive;" and (3) "suspicious for," or "squamous cell carcinoma." Classification of PVL lesions based on a combination of clinical findings and these histologic descriptive categories is encouraged in order to standardize reporting, aid in future research and potentially guide clinical management.
增生性疣状白斑(PVL)中观察到的广泛变化使用了许多不同的术语,导致了不同的临床管理。本研究的目的是为病理学家诊断与 PVL 相关病变的标准化评估和报告制定专家共识指南。从六家机构的 84 名 PVL 患者中选择了 299 例活检,这些患者在数年中出现了多发性口腔白色斑块病变(至少随访 36 个月)。这些病变表现出 PVL 描述的组织学特征谱,在某些情况下,患者发展为口腔鳞状细胞癌(SCC)。一组口腔颌面和头颈部病理学家的专家工作组以严格的方式审查了微观特征,并在有临床照片时进行了审查。工作组随后选择了 43 例单张切片活检病例进行全切片数字成像(WSI)由共识会议成员进行审查。然后在至少 90 天的洗脱期后,对数字图像进行了两次调查。作为对照,纳入了 5 例非 PVL 组织学模拟病例。在有 19 名成员报告病例的共识会议上对病例进行了重新评估。与 PVL 病变相比,最佳的观察者间诊断一致性被归类为“波纹状正(副)过度角化病变,非反应性”和“SCC”(卡方 p=0.015)。“大块过度角化上皮增生,非反应性”类别的病变一致性较差(kappa<0.60)。对于 48 例中的 35 例,有≥中度一致性(>0.41 kappa)。该专家共识指南得到了美国口腔颌面病理学会和北美头颈病理学会领导层的支持和认可,旨在推荐使用标准化的组织病理学标准和描述性术语来指示 PVL 内的三种病变类别:(1)“波纹状正(副)过度角化病变,非反应性”;(2)“大块过度角化上皮增生,非反应性”;和(3)“可疑的”或“鳞状细胞癌”。基于临床发现和这些组织学描述性分类的组合对 PVL 病变进行分类,以标准化报告、帮助未来的研究并可能指导临床管理。