Yin Liangyu, Lin Xin, Liu Jie, Li Na, He Xiumei, Zhang Mengyuan, Guo Jing, Yang Jian, Deng Li, Wang Yizhuo, Liang Tingting, Wang Chang, Jiang Hua, Fu Zhenming, Li Suyi, Wang Kunhua, Guo Zengqing, Ba Yi, Li Wei, Song Chunhua, Cui Jiuwei, Shi Hanping, Xu Hongxia
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021 Nov;45(8):1736-1748. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2070. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
The newly proposed Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) framework is promising to gain global acceptance for diagnosing malnutrition. However, the role of machine learning in facilitating its application in clinical practice remains largely unknown.
We performed a multicenter, observational cohort study including 3998 patients with cancer. Baseline malnutrition was defined using the GLIM criteria, and the study population was randomly divided into a derivation group (n = 2998) and a validation group (n = 1000). A classification and regression trees (CART) algorithm was used to develop a decision tree for classifying the severity of malnutrition in the derivation group. Model performance was evaluated in the validation group.
GLIM criteria diagnosed 588 patients (14.7%) with moderate malnutrition and 532 patients (13.3%) with severe malnutrition among the study population. The CART cross-validation identified 5 key predictors for the decision tree construction, including age, weight loss within 6 months, body mass index, calf circumference, and the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 score. The decision tree showed high performance, with an area under the curve of 0.964 (κ = 0.898, P < .001, accuracy = 0.955) in the validation group. Subgroup analysis showed that the model had apparently good performance in different cancers. Among the 5 predictors constituting the tree, age contributed the least to the classification power.
Using the machine learning, we visualized and validated a decision tool based on the GLIM criteria that can be conveniently used to accelerate the pretreatment identification of malnutrition in patients with cancer.
新提出的全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)框架有望在全球范围内被接受用于诊断营养不良。然而,机器学习在促进其在临床实践中的应用方面的作用在很大程度上仍不明确。
我们进行了一项多中心观察性队列研究,纳入了3998例癌症患者。使用GLIM标准定义基线营养不良,并将研究人群随机分为推导组(n = 2998)和验证组(n = 1000)。使用分类与回归树(CART)算法在推导组中开发用于分类营养不良严重程度的决策树。在验证组中评估模型性能。
在研究人群中,GLIM标准诊断出588例(14.7%)中度营养不良患者和532例(13.3%)重度营养不良患者。CART交叉验证确定了决策树构建的5个关键预测因素,包括年龄、6个月内体重减轻、体重指数、小腿围和2002年营养风险筛查评分。决策树表现出高性能,在验证组中曲线下面积为0.964(κ = 0.898,P <.001,准确率 = 0.955)。亚组分析表明该模型在不同癌症中表现出明显良好的性能。在构成该树的5个预测因素中,年龄对分类能力的贡献最小。
通过机器学习,我们可视化并验证了一种基于GLIM标准的决策工具,可方便地用于加速癌症患者营养不良的预处理识别。