• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智者局:将老年声音纳入有意义的研究中。

The Bureau of Sages: Incorporating Older Adult Voice into Meaningful Research.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(3):359-370. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0041.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2020.0041
PMID:33416611
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults receiving long-term care are often excluded from the design, development, and implementation of health-related research. The project aimed to create, implement and evaluate a sustainable research advisory board consisting of researchers, clinicians, and older adults living at home or in a skilled nursing facility (SNF).

METHODS

To initiate Bureau development, 15 older adults, researchers, and clinicians came together to engage in research. In meetings and retreats, stakeholders mutually developed group procedures, roles, and values. Process evaluation focused on stakeholder experiences, development of the Bureau, and its impact.

RESULTS

Trained Sages were able to offer meaningful input to researchers and present their own proposal at a conference. Lessons learned centered around continuously seeking feedback from participants, emphasizing co-learning, adapting to virtual engagement, and remaining flexible in structure and content of meetings.

CONCLUSIONS

Results can inform future development of research advisory boards of older adult populations.

摘要

背景

接受长期护理的老年人通常被排除在健康相关研究的设计、开发和实施之外。本项目旨在创建、实施和评估一个由研究人员、临床医生和居住在家庭或熟练护理设施(SNF)中的老年人组成的可持续研究顾问委员会。

方法

为了启动局的发展,15 名老年人、研究人员和临床医生聚集在一起参与研究。在会议和务虚会上,利益相关者共同制定了小组程序、角色和价值观。过程评估侧重于利益相关者的经验、局的发展及其影响。

结果

经过培训的智者能够为研究人员提供有意义的投入,并在会议上提出自己的建议。经验教训主要集中在不断向参与者征求反馈意见、强调共同学习、适应虚拟参与以及灵活处理会议的结构和内容上。

结论

研究结果可以为未来老年人研究顾问委员会的发展提供信息。

相似文献

1
The Bureau of Sages: Incorporating Older Adult Voice into Meaningful Research.智者局:将老年声音纳入有意义的研究中。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(3):359-370. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0041.
2
Facilitating Meaningful Engagement on Community Advisory Committees in Patient-Centered Outcome Research.促进患者为中心的结果研究中社区咨询委员会的有意义参与。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(3):243-251. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0029.
3
A Multilevel Approach to Stakeholder Engagement in the Formulation of a Clinical Data Research Network.多层次方法在临床数据研究网络制定中的利益相关者参与。
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S22-S26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000778.
4
Building a Bridge Between Genetics and Outcomes Research: Application in Autism (The AutGO Study).建立遗传学与结局研究之间的桥梁:自闭症中的应用(AutGO 研究)。
Patient. 2018 Aug;11(4):451-462. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0302-z.
5
Engaging Stakeholders to Develop a Patient-centered Research Agenda: Lessons Learned From the Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet).让利益相关者参与制定以患者为中心的研究议程:从健康网络研究行动(REACHnet)中吸取的经验教训。
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S27-S32. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000785.
6
A protocol for stakeholder engagement in deliver-EE: A pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial evaluating effects of meal delivery on the ability of homebound older adults to remain in the community.利益相关者参与 deliver-EE 协议:一项实用的随机对照有效性试验,评估送餐对居家老年人体能的影响,以使其继续留在社区中。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;141:107535. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107535. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
Health Care Engagement of Limited English Proficient Latino Families: Lessons Learned from Advisory Board Development.英语水平有限的拉丁裔家庭的医疗保健参与:咨询委员会发展的经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Winter;9(4):521-30. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0068.
8
Lessons on Patient and Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Pipeline to Proposal Awards.从管线到提案奖的患者和利益相关者参与策略的经验教训。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):303-310. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.303. eCollection 2018.
9
Community ACTION boards: an innovative model for effective community-academic research partnerships.社区行动委员会:建立有效社区-学术研究伙伴关系的创新模式。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Winter;5(4):399-404.
10
A Process Evaluation of Developing Older Adult Research Advisory Boards in Long-term Care Settings.长期护理环境中老年人研究顾问委员会的制定过程评估。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2022;16(3):393-400. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2022.0055.

引用本文的文献

1
Engaging people with lived experience on community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: a scoping review.让有实际生活经验的人参与社区参与式研究中的社区咨询委员会:一项范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jul 18;24(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02573-5.
2
Effective approaches to public involvement in care home research: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.公众参与养老院研究的有效方法:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 2;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00453-2.
3
Making Pain Research More Inclusive: Why and How.
让疼痛研究更具包容性:原因与方法。
J Pain. 2022 May;23(5):707-728. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Oct 20.