• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用洛伦兹曲线衡量 COVID-19 检测中的种族不平等。

Using Lorenz Curves to Measure Racial Inequities in COVID-19 Testing.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2032696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32696.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32696
PMID:33416882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7794664/
Abstract

This cross-sectional study uses Lorenz curves as a metric for quantifying racial inequities in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing.

摘要

本横断面研究使用 Lorenz 曲线作为衡量 2019 冠状病毒病（COVID-19）检测中种族不平等的指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7161/7794664/6c710a0cf005/jamanetwopen-e2032696-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7161/7794664/6c710a0cf005/jamanetwopen-e2032696-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7161/7794664/6c710a0cf005/jamanetwopen-e2032696-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Lorenz Curves to Measure Racial Inequities in COVID-19 Testing.利用洛伦兹曲线衡量 COVID-19 检测中的种族不平等。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2032696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32696.
2
Breaking Links in the Chain of Racial Disparities for COVID-19.打破新冠疫情中种族差异链条上的环节。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112879. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12879.
3
Assessment of COVID-19 Hospitalizations by Race/Ethnicity in 12 States.12 个州的基于种族/族裔的 COVID-19 住院评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jan 1;181(1):131-134. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3857.
4
Could Clinician Sensitivity to Cultural and Historical Considerations Help Reduce COVID-19 Deaths among Blacks?临床医生对文化和历史因素的敏感度能否帮助减少黑人中的新冠死亡病例？
South Med J. 2021 Sep;114(9):591-592. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001288.
5
Racial disparities in COVID-19 hospitalizations do not lead to disparities in outcomes.新冠病毒住院患者中存在的种族差异并不会导致结果的差异。
Public Health. 2021 Jan;190:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.11.021. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
6
SARS-CoV-2 testing in North Carolina: Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities.北卡罗来纳州的 SARS-CoV-2 检测：种族、民族和地理差异。
Health Place. 2021 May;69:102576. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102576. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
7
Racial and ethnic inequities in the early distribution of U.S. COVID-19 testing sites and mortality.美国 COVID-19 检测点和死亡率的早期分布存在种族和民族差异。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Nov;51(11):e13669. doi: 10.1111/eci.13669. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
Missing data and missed infections: investigating racial and ethnic disparities in SARS-CoV-2 testing and infection rates in Holyoke, Massachusetts.缺失数据和漏检感染：调查马萨诸塞州 holyoke 市 SARS-CoV-2 检测和感染率的种族和民族差异。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Jun 3;193(6):908-916. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae011.
9
Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Differences in Mortality Rates Among Black and White US Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized With COVID-19 Infection.与 COVID-19 感染住院的美国医疗保险受益的黑人和白人患者死亡率差异相关的患者和医院因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112842. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12842.
10
National Disparities in COVID-19 Outcomes between Black and White Americans.美国黑人和白人在 COVID-19 结局方面的国家差异。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2021 Apr;113(2):125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambulatory care for individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.为同时符合医疗保险和医疗补助资格的个人提供的门诊护理。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 31;3(8):qxaf148. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf148. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A Canadian multi-province study of COVID-19 vaccine coverage along area-level social determinants in 2021.2021年加拿大一项关于新冠病毒疫苗接种覆盖率与地区层面社会决定因素关系的多省份研究。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2025 Feb 20;9:100594. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100594. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Respiratory distress syndrome is the poster child for neonatology.

本文引用的文献

1
Allocation of COVID-19 Relief Funding to Disproportionately Black Counties.将新冠疫情救济资金分配给黑人选区比例过高的县。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 8;324(10):1000-1003. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14978.
2
Disparities in COVID-19 Testing and Positivity in New York City.纽约市 COVID-19 检测和阳性率的差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):326-332. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
3
COVID-19 and Racial/Ethnic Disparities.新冠病毒病与种族/民族差异
呼吸窘迫综合征是新生儿学的典型病例。
Pediatr Res. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03723-1.
4
Assessing equity in the distribution of hospital beds in Lorestan, western Iran: a regional analysis.评估伊朗西部洛雷斯坦省医院床位分布的公平性：区域分析
J Prev Med Hyg. 2024 Oct 31;65(3):E449-E455. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2024.65.3.3356. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Social Disparities and Critical Illness during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Narrative Review.《2019 冠状病毒病大流行期间的社会差异和危重症：叙述性评论》。
Crit Care Clin. 2024 Oct;40(4):805-825. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2024.05.010.
6
Sociodemographic Inequalities in COVID-19 Booster Dose Vaccination Coverage: a Retrospective Study of 196 Provinces in Peru.新冠病毒加强针疫苗接种覆盖率中的社会人口统计学不平等：秘鲁196个省份的回顾性研究
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02060-7.
7
Association of long COVID with housing insecurity in the United States, 2022-2023.2022 - 2023年美国长期新冠与住房不安全的关联
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Dec 14;25:101586. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101586. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
COVID-19 Testing Among People with HIV: A Population Level Analysis Based on Statewide Data in South Carolina.艾滋病毒感染者中的 COVID-19 检测：基于南卡罗来纳州全州数据的人群水平分析。
AIDS Behav. 2024 Oct;28(Suppl 1):22-32. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04244-4. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
9
Contrasting socioeconomic inequality with noncommunicable diseases: Insights from a population-based survey using the concentration index in Kong cohort study.对比社会经济不平等与非传染性疾病：基于香港队列研究中使用集中指数的人群调查的见解
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 5;6(11):e1682. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1682. eCollection 2023 Nov.
10
Understanding social risk factors of county-level disparities in COVID-19 tests per confirmed case in South Carolina using statewide electronic health records data.利用全州范围内的电子健康记录数据，了解南卡罗来纳州每例确诊病例 COVID-19 检测县级差异的社会风险因素。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 31;23(1):2135. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17055-y.
JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2466-2467. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8598.