Physical Therapy Department, Women's Health Research Laboratory, Rodovia Washington Luís, km 235, Monjolinho, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Physical Therapy Department, Preventive Physical Therapy and Ergonomics Laboratory, São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, km 235, Monjolinho, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Dec;32(12):3199-3207. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04629-2. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the PERFECT scheme assessed by uni- and bidigital vaginal palpation in young nulligravid women.
Forty healthy women [median age 22 (19-34) years] were evaluated by unidigital vaginal palpation by both Examiners A and C, while the other 40 participants [median age 23.5 (19-35) years] were assessed by Examiners B and C by bidigital vaginal palpation. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of all items of the PERFECT scheme were evaluated: P = power (Modified Oxford Scale); E = endurance; R = repetitions; F = fast contractions. Cohen's linear weighted kappa (κw) was used to assess the reliability of the power, while the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was applied for the other items. A priori sample size calculation found that 40 participants would be adequate.
Inter-rater reliability of unidigital palpation was considered fair for power (κw = 0.34) and poor for other items (ICC < 0.50); bidigital inter-rater reliability was considered moderate (power: κw = 0.57; endurance: ICC = 0.53; fast contractions: ICC = 0.65, respectively) and low (repetitions: ICC = 0.27). Intra-rater reliability was substantial for power (κw = 0.73 and 0.62), moderate for fast contractions (ICC = 0.63 and 0.51) and poor for repetitions (ICC < 0.50), respectively, for uni- and bidigital palpation. Endurance showed poor (ICC < 0.50) and moderate (ICC = 0.61) reliability for uni- and bidigital palpation.
The PERFECT scheme carried out by bidigital vaginal palpation presents higher reliability when two examiners carry out the physical examination. When one examiner is responsible for PFM assessment, both types of palpation are recommended for evaluation of power and fast contraction; endurance should be evaluated using bidigital palpation. Examiners should be careful during the assessment of repetition of sustained contractions because inter- and intra-reliabilities for both types of palpation were classified as poor.
本研究的目的是评估通过单指和双指阴道触诊评估 PERFECT 方案在年轻初产妇中的组内和组间可靠性。
40 名健康女性(中位年龄 22 岁(19-34 岁))接受了 Examiner A 和 C 的单指阴道触诊评估,而另外 40 名参与者(中位年龄 23.5 岁(19-35 岁))接受了 Examiner B 和 C 的双指阴道触诊评估。通过单指和双指阴道触诊评估 PERFECT 方案的所有项目的组内和组间可靠性:P=力量(改良牛津量表);E=耐力;R=重复次数;F=快速收缩。使用 Cohen 的线性加权κ(κw)评估力量的可靠性,而其他项目则使用组内相关系数(ICC)。事先的样本量计算发现,40 名参与者就足够了。
单指触诊的组间可靠性被认为是力量的适度(κw=0.34)和其他项目的较差(ICC<0.50);双指触诊的组间可靠性被认为是中度(力量:κw=0.57;耐力:ICC=0.53;快速收缩:ICC=0.65)和低(重复:ICC=0.27)。单指触诊的组内可靠性对于力量是高度可靠的(κw=0.73 和 0.62),对于快速收缩是中度可靠的(ICC=0.63 和 0.51),对于重复是较差的(ICC<0.50),双指触诊的组内可靠性对于力量是高度可靠的(κw=0.73 和 0.62),对于快速收缩是中度可靠的(ICC=0.63 和 0.51),对于重复是较差的(ICC<0.50)。耐力对于单指和双指触诊的可靠性较差(ICC<0.50)和中度(ICC=0.61)。
通过双指阴道触诊进行的 PERFECT 方案在两名检查者进行体格检查时具有更高的可靠性。当一名检查者负责评估 PFM 时,建议同时使用两种触诊方法来评估力量和快速收缩;耐力应使用双指触诊进行评估。检查者在评估持续收缩的重复次数时应小心,因为两种触诊方法的组内和组间可靠性均被归类为较差。