Haines T, Chong J, Verrall A B, Julian J, Bernholz C, Spears R, Muir D C
Occupational Health Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Br J Ind Med. 1988 Feb;45(2):106-11. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.2.106.
The objective of this study was to investigate whether aesthesiometric threshold changes occur over the course of a workshift in vibration exposed hard rock miners relative to workers unexposed to vibration during the shift. The subjects were 99 miners and 40 smelter workers; four subjects declined to participate and nine were excluded from the analysis because of apparent failure to comprehend the testing procedure. Two point discrimination and depth sense aesthesiometry were conducted at the beginning and at the end of the workshift in all digits of both hands excluding the thumbs. In addition to the use of a vibrating tool during the shift, age, digital temperature, signs of arm injury, presence of fingertip callus, and handedness were documented. In the analysis the difference between postshift and preshift readings was studied in relation to these variables, particularly exposure to the jackleg drill during the shift. With the exception of exposure of the jackleg drill, no associations were observed between these variables and change over the workshift in aesthesiometric results, on both unadjusted comparison of means and backward elimination regression analysis. A statistically significant association, however, was found between the use of a jackleg drill and change in two point discrimination and in depth sense aesthesiometric results over the course of the shift, for the right hand. Evidence of the occurrence of a learning effect, particularly for two point discrimination aesthesiometry, was observed. The occurrence of an effect in the right, but not the left, hand reflects dominant handedness and relatively greater vibration exposure in the right hand in our subjects. This study supports the incorporation of an exposure free interval before aesthesiometric testing of vibration exposed workers.
本研究的目的是调查与在轮班期间未接触振动的工人相比,接触振动的硬岩矿工在轮班过程中是否会出现感觉阈值变化。研究对象为99名矿工和40名冶炼工人;4名受试者拒绝参与,9名受试者因明显未能理解测试程序而被排除在分析之外。在轮班开始和结束时,对双手除拇指外的所有手指进行两点辨别和深度感觉测痛法测试。除了在轮班期间使用振动工具外,还记录了年龄、手指温度、手臂受伤迹象、指尖胼胝的存在情况以及利手情况。在分析中,研究了轮班后和轮班前读数之间的差异与这些变量的关系,特别是在轮班期间接触风动凿岩机的情况。除了接触风动凿岩机外,在未经调整的均值比较和向后排除回归分析中,未观察到这些变量与轮班期间感觉测量结果变化之间的关联。然而,发现使用风动凿岩机与右手在轮班过程中两点辨别和深度感觉测痛法结果的变化之间存在统计学上的显著关联。观察到存在学习效应的证据,特别是在两点辨别测痛法方面。右手出现效应而左手未出现效应反映了我们研究对象的利手优势以及右手相对更大的振动暴露。本研究支持在对接触振动的工人进行感觉测量测试之前纳入无暴露间隔期。