Epicentre, Paris, France.
Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya; Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):119-127. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32520-4.
Stocks of yellow fever vaccine are insufficient to cover exceptional demands for outbreak response. Fractional dosing has shown efficacy, but evidence is limited to the 17DD substrain vaccine. We assessed the immunogenicity and safety of one-fifth fractional dose compared with standard dose of four WHO-prequalified yellow fever vaccines produced from three substrains.
We did this randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial at research centres in Mbarara, Uganda, and Kilifi, Kenya. Eligible participants were aged 18-59 years, had no contraindications for vaccination, were not pregnant or lactating, had no history of yellow fever vaccination or infection, and did not require yellow fever vaccination for travel. Eligible participants were recruited from communities and randomly assigned to one of eight groups, corresponding to the four vaccines at standard or fractional dose. The vaccine was administered subcutaneously by nurses who were not masked to treatment, but participants and other study personnel were masked to vaccine allocation. The primary outcome was proportion of participants with seroconversion 28 days after vaccination. Seroconversion was defined as post-vaccination neutralising antibody titres at least 4 times pre-vaccination measurement measured by 50% plaque reduction neutralisation test (PRNT). We defined non-inferiority as less than 10% decrease in seroconversion in fractional compared with standard dose groups 28 days after vaccination. The primary outcome was measured in the per-protocol population, and safety analyses included all vaccinated participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02991495.
Between Nov 6, 2017, and Feb 21, 2018, 1029 participants were assessed for inclusion. 69 people were ineligible, and 960 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to vaccine manufacturer and dose (120 to Bio-Manguinhos-Fiocruz standard dose, 120 to Bio-Manguinhos-Fiocruz fractional dose, 120 to Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides standard dose, 120 to Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides fractional dose, 120 to Institut Pasteur Dakar standard dose, 120 to Institut Pasteur Dakar fractional dose, 120 to Sanofi Pasteur standard dose, and 120 to Sanofi Pasteur fractional dose). 49 participants had detectable PRNT at baseline and 11 had missing PRNT results at baseline or 28 days. 900 were included in the per-protocol analysis. 959 participants were included in the safety analysis. The absolute difference in seroconversion between fractional and standard doses by vaccine was 1·71% (95% CI -2·60 to 5·28) for Bio-Manguinhos-Fiocruz, -0·90% (-4·24 to 3·13) for Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, 1·82% (-2·75 to 5·39) for Institut Pasteur Dakar, and 0·0% (-3·32 to 3·29) for Sanofi Pasteur. Fractional doses from all four vaccines met the non-inferiority criterion. The most common treatment-related adverse events were headache (22·2%), fatigue (13·7%), myalgia (13·3%) and self-reported fever (9·0%). There were no study-vaccine related serious adverse events.
Fractional doses of all WHO-prequalified yellow fever vaccines were non-inferior to the standard dose in inducing seroconversion 28 days after vaccination, with no major safety concerns. These results support the use of fractional dosage in the general adult population for outbreak response in situations of vaccine shortage.
The study was funded by Médecins Sans Frontières Foundation, Wellcome Trust (grant no. 092654), and the UK Department for International Development. Vaccines were donated in kind.
黄热病疫苗的库存不足以满足应对疫情的特殊需求。分剂量接种已显示出疗效,但证据仅限于 17DD 亚株疫苗。我们评估了与三种亚株生产的三种世界卫生组织(WHO)批准的黄热病疫苗的标准剂量相比,使用五分之一分剂量的免疫原性和安全性。
我们在乌干达姆巴拉拉和肯尼亚基利菲的研究中心进行了这项随机、双盲、非劣效性试验。合格的参与者年龄在 18-59 岁之间,没有接种疫苗的禁忌症,没有怀孕或哺乳期,没有黄热病疫苗接种或感染史,也不需要因旅行而接种黄热病疫苗。从社区招募合格的参与者,并随机分为八组,每组对应四种疫苗的标准剂量或分剂量。护士通过皮下注射疫苗,护士不了解治疗情况,但参与者和其他研究人员对疫苗分配情况不知情。主要结局是接种疫苗 28 天后血清转化率的比例。血清转化率定义为接种后中和抗体滴度至少是接种前测量值的 4 倍,通过 50%蚀斑减少中和试验(PRNT)测量。我们将接种疫苗 28 天后与标准剂量组相比,分剂量组血清转化率下降不超过 10%定义为非劣效性。主要结局在方案人群中进行测量,安全性分析包括所有接种疫苗的参与者。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,NCT02991495。
在 2017 年 11 月 6 日至 2018 年 2 月 21 日期间,对 1029 名参与者进行了纳入评估。69 人不符合条件,960 名参与者被纳入并随机分配给疫苗制造商和剂量(120 人接受生物-曼古因霍斯-菲洛夸鲁标准剂量,120 人接受生物-曼古因霍斯-菲洛夸鲁分剂量,120 人接受丘马科夫研究所脊髓灰质炎和病毒性脑炎标准剂量,120 人接受丘马科夫研究所脊髓灰质炎和病毒性脑炎分剂量,120 人接受巴斯德研究所达喀尔标准剂量,120 人接受巴斯德研究所达喀尔分剂量,120 人接受赛诺菲巴斯德标准剂量,120 人接受赛诺菲巴斯德分剂量)。49 名参与者基线时可检测到 PRNT,11 名参与者基线或 28 天时 PRNT 结果缺失。900 人纳入方案人群进行分析。959 人纳入安全性分析。根据疫苗的不同,分剂量和标准剂量之间血清转化率的绝对差异为:生物-曼古因霍斯-菲洛夸鲁为 1.71%(95%CI-2.60 至 5.28),丘马科夫研究所脊髓灰质炎和病毒性脑炎为-0.90%(-4.24 至 3.13),巴斯德研究所达喀尔为 1.82%(-2.75 至 5.39),赛诺菲巴斯德为 0.0%(-3.32 至 3.29)。所有四种疫苗的分剂量均符合非劣效性标准。最常见的与治疗相关的不良事件是头痛(22.2%)、疲劳(13.7%)、肌痛(13.3%)和自我报告的发热(9.0%)。没有与研究疫苗相关的严重不良事件。
所有四种 WHO 批准的黄热病疫苗的五分之一分剂量在接种疫苗 28 天后诱导血清转化率方面均不劣于标准剂量,且无重大安全性问题。这些结果支持在疫苗短缺的情况下,在一般成年人群中使用分剂量进行疫情应对。
该研究由无国界医生组织基金会、惠康信托基金(资助号 092654)和英国国际发展部资助。疫苗是免费提供的。