• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国,使用乙型脑炎病毒或黄热病病毒疫苗进行初免成年人中,一种纯化的灭活寨卡病毒候选疫苗的安全性和免疫原性:一项 1 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。

Safety and immunogenicity of a purified inactivated Zika virus vaccine candidate in adults primed with a Japanese encephalitis virus or yellow fever virus vaccine in the USA: a phase 1, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Viral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Viral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Oct;23(10):1175-1185. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00192-5. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00192-5
PMID:37390836
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10877583/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Zika virus infection is a threat to at-risk populations, causing major birth defects and serious neurological complications. Development of a safe and efficacious Zika virus vaccine is, therefore, a global health priority. Assessment of heterologous flavivirus vaccination is important given co-circulation of Japanese encephalitis virus and yellow fever virus with Zika virus. We investigated the effect of priming flavivirus naive participants with a licensed flavivirus vaccine on the safety and immunogenicity of a purified inactivated Zika vaccine (ZPIV).

METHODS

This phase 1, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was done at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Clinical Trials Center in Silver Spring, MD, USA. Eligible participants were healthy adults aged 18-49 years, with no detectable evidence of previous flavivirus exposure (by infection or vaccination), as measured by a microneutralisation assay. Individuals with serological evidence of HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection were excluded, as were pregnant or breastfeeding women. Participants were recruited sequentially into one of three groups (1:1:1) to receive no primer, two doses of intramuscular Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine (IXIARO), or a single dose of subcutaneous yellow fever virus vaccine (YF-VAX). Within each group, participants were randomly assigned (4:1) to receive intramuscular ZPIV or placebo. Priming vaccinations were given 72-96 days before ZPIV. ZPIV was administered either two or three times, at days 0, 28, and 196-234. The primary outcome was occurrence of solicited systemic and local adverse events along with serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest. These data were analysed in all participants receiving at least one dose of ZPIV or placebo. Secondary outcomes included measurement of neutralizing antibody responses following ZPIV vaccination in all volunteers with available post-vaccination data. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02963909.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 7, 2016, and Oct 30, 2018, 134 participants were assessed for eligibility. 21 did not meet inclusion criteria, 29 met exclusion criteria, and ten declined to participate. 75 participants were recruited and randomly assigned. 35 (47%) of 75 participants were male and 40 (53%) were female. 25 (33%) of 75 participants identified as Black or African American and 42 (56%) identified as White. These proportions and other baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, race, or BMI between those who did and did not opt into the third dose. All participants received the planned priming IXIARO and YF-VAX vaccinations, but one participant who received YF-VAX dropped out before receipt of the first dose of ZPIV. 50 participants received a third dose of ZPIV or placebo, including 14 flavivirus-naive people, 17 people primed with Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine, and 19 participants primed with yellow fever vaccine. Vaccinations were well tolerated across groups. Pain at the injection site was the only adverse event reported more frequently in participants who received ZPIV than in those who received placebo (39 [65%] of 60 participants, 95% CI 51·6-76·9 who received ZPIV vs three [21·4%] of 14 who received placebo; 4·7-50·8; p=0·006). No patients had an adverse event of special interest or serious adverse event related to study treatment. At day 57, the flavivirus-naive volunteers had an 88% (63·6-98·5, 15 of 17) seroconversion rate (neutralising antibody titre ≥1:10) and geometric mean neutralising antibody titre (GMT) against Zika virus of 100·8 (39·7-255·7). In the Japanese encephalitis vaccine-primed group, the day 57 seroconversion rate was 31·6% (95% CI 12·6-56·6, six of 19) and GMT was 11·8 (6·1-22·8). Participants primed with YF-VAX had a seroconversion rate of 25% (95% CI 8·7-49·1, five of 20) and GMT of 6·6 (5·2-8·4). Humoral immune responses rose substantially following a third dose of ZPIV, with seroconversion rates of 100% (69·2-100; ten of ten), 92·9% (66·1-99·8; 13 of 14), and 60% (32·2-83·7, nine of 15) and GMTs of 511·5 (177·6-1473·6), 174·2 (51·6-587·6), and 79 (19·0-326·8) in the flavivirus naive, Japanese encephalitis vaccine-primed, and yellow fever vaccine-primed groups, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

We found ZPIV to be well tolerated in flavivirus naive and primed adults but that immunogenicity varied significantly according to antecedent flavivirus vaccination status. Immune bias towards the flavivirus antigen of initial exposure and the timing of vaccination may have impacted responses. A third ZPIV dose overcame much, but not all, of the discrepancy in immunogenicity. The results of this phase 1 clinical trial have implications for further evaluation of ZPIV's immunisation schedule and use of concomitant vaccinations.

FUNDING

Department of Defense, Defense Health Agency; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; and Division of Microbiology and Infectious Disease.

摘要

背景

寨卡病毒感染对高危人群构成威胁,导致重大出生缺陷和严重神经并发症。因此,开发一种安全有效的寨卡病毒疫苗是全球卫生的当务之急。评估异源黄病毒疫苗接种情况很重要,因为日本脑炎病毒和黄热病病毒与寨卡病毒同时流行。我们研究了用已许可的黄病毒疫苗对寨卡病毒无反应的参与者进行初级免疫对纯化灭活寨卡病毒疫苗(ZPIV)的安全性和免疫原性的影响。

方法

这是一项在美国马里兰州银泉的沃尔特·里德陆军研究所临床试验中心进行的、安慰剂对照、双盲的 1 期临床试验。合格的参与者为年龄在 18-49 岁之间的健康成年人,没有可检测到的先前黄病毒暴露(通过感染或疫苗接种)的证据,这是通过微量中和测定来衡量的。排除有血清学证据表明感染 HIV、乙型肝炎或丙型肝炎的个体,以及孕妇或哺乳期妇女。参与者按 1:1:1 的比例连续招募到三组(每组 3 人),分别接受无佐剂、2 剂肌内接种日本脑炎病毒疫苗(IXIARO)或单次皮下接种黄热病病毒疫苗(YF-VAX)。在每组内,参与者被随机(4:1)分配接受肌内 ZPIV 或安慰剂。初级疫苗接种在 ZPIV 前 72-96 天进行。ZPIV 接种 2 次或 3 次,在第 0、28 和 196-234 天。主要结局是所有接受至少一剂 ZPIV 或安慰剂的参与者出现的全身和局部不良事件以及严重不良事件和特殊关注的不良事件。这些数据在所有接受至少一剂 ZPIV 或安慰剂的参与者中进行了分析。次要结局包括在所有有可用接种后数据的志愿者中测量接种 ZPIV 后的中和抗体反应。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,NCT02963909。

发现

2016 年 11 月 7 日至 2018 年 10 月 30 日,对 134 名参与者进行了资格评估。21 名不符合纳入标准,29 名不符合排除标准,10 名拒绝参加。招募了 75 名参与者并进行了随机分组。75 名参与者中,35 名(47%)为男性,40 名(53%)为女性。25 名(33%)参与者为黑人或非裔美国人,42 名(56%)为白人。这些比例和其他基线特征在各组之间相似。在是否选择接种第三剂疫苗方面,年龄、性别、种族和 BMI 之间没有统计学上的显著差异。所有参与者均接受了计划中的初级免疫 IXIARO 和 YF-VAX 疫苗接种,但一名接种 YF-VAX 的参与者在接种 ZPIV 第一剂前退出。50 名参与者接受了 ZPIV 或安慰剂的第三剂接种,包括 14 名寨卡病毒无反应者、17 名日本脑炎病毒疫苗接种初级者和 19 名黄热病疫苗接种初级者。各组的疫苗接种均耐受良好。与接受安慰剂的参与者相比,在接受 ZPIV 接种的参与者中,只有注射部位疼痛这一不良事件报告更为频繁(60 名参与者中的 39 名[65%],95%CI51.6-76.9 接受 ZPIV 治疗,14 名无寨卡病毒反应者中的 3 名[21.4%]接受安慰剂;4.7-50.8;p=0.006)。没有患者出现与研究治疗相关的特殊关注的不良事件或严重不良事件。在第 57 天,寨卡病毒无反应者的血清转化率(中和抗体滴度≥1:10)为 88%(17 名中的 15 名,15-98.5),几何平均中和抗体滴度(GMT)为 100.8(39.7-255.7)。在日本脑炎病毒疫苗接种初级者中,第 57 天的血清转化率为 31.6%(95%CI12.6-56.6,19 名中的 6 名),GMT 为 11.8(6.1-22.8)。用 YF-VAX 疫苗接种初级者的血清转化率为 25%(95%CI8.7-49.1,20 名中的 5 名),GMT 为 6.6(5.2-8.4)。接种第三剂 ZPIV 后,体液免疫反应显著升高,血清转化率分别为 100%(69.2-100;10/10)、92.9%(66.1-99.8;13/14)和 60%(32.2-83.7,9/15),GMT 分别为 511.5(177.6-1473.6)、174.2(51.6-587.6)和 79(19.0-326.8)。

解释

我们发现 ZPIV 在寨卡病毒无反应和初级免疫的成年人中耐受良好,但免疫原性根据先前的黄病毒接种情况而有显著差异。初次接触的黄病毒抗原和接种时间的免疫偏向可能影响了反应。接种第三剂 ZPIV 克服了很大一部分,但不是全部,免疫原性的差异。这项 1 期临床研究的结果对进一步评估 ZPIV 的免疫接种方案和同时使用其他疫苗具有重要意义。

资助

美国国防部、国防卫生局、国家过敏和传染病研究所和微生物学和传染病司。

相似文献

1
Safety and immunogenicity of a purified inactivated Zika virus vaccine candidate in adults primed with a Japanese encephalitis virus or yellow fever virus vaccine in the USA: a phase 1, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.在美国,使用乙型脑炎病毒或黄热病病毒疫苗进行初免成年人中,一种纯化的灭活寨卡病毒候选疫苗的安全性和免疫原性:一项 1 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Oct;23(10):1175-1185. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00192-5. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
2
Safety and immunogenicity of a Zika purified inactivated virus vaccine given via standard, accelerated, or shortened schedules: a single-centre, double-blind, sequential-group, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial.通过标准、加速或缩短免疫程序接种的寨卡病毒纯化灭活疫苗的安全性和免疫原性:一项单中心、双盲、序贯组、随机、安慰剂对照的1期试验
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;20(9):1061-1070. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30085-2. Epub 2020 May 6.
3
Safety and immunogenicity of a purified inactivated Zika virus vaccine candidate in healthy adults: an observer-blind, randomised, phase 1 trial.健康成年人中一种纯化的灭活寨卡病毒候选疫苗的安全性和免疫原性:一项观察者盲法、随机、1 期临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1282-1292. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30733-7. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
Priming with Japanese encephalitis virus or yellow fever virus vaccination led to the recognition of multiple flaviviruses without boosting antibody responses induced by an inactivated Zika virus vaccine.接种日本脑炎病毒或黄热病病毒疫苗可增强对多种黄病毒的识别能力,而不会增强灭活寨卡病毒疫苗诱导的抗体应答。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Nov;97:104815. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104815. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
5
The safety and immunogenicity of two Zika virus mRNA vaccine candidates in healthy flavivirus baseline seropositive and seronegative adults: the results of two randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase 1 clinical trials.两种寨卡病毒 mRNA 疫苗候选物在健康黄病毒基线血清阳性和血清阴性成年人中的安全性和免疫原性:两项随机、安慰剂对照、剂量范围、1 期临床试验的结果。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 May;23(5):621-633. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00764-2. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
6
Preliminary aggregate safety and immunogenicity results from three trials of a purified inactivated Zika virus vaccine candidate: phase 1, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.一种纯化灭活寨卡病毒候选疫苗三项试验的初步总体安全性和免疫原性结果:1期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2018 Feb 10;391(10120):563-571. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33106-9. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
7
Safety and immunogenicity of a protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine (ZF2001) in healthy children and adolescents aged 3-17 years in China: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial and an open-label, non-randomised, non-inferiority, phase 2 trial.中国健康儿童和青少年中 3-17 岁人群中使用一种新型冠状病毒蛋白亚单位疫苗(ZF2001)的安全性和免疫原性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、1 期临床试验和一项开放标签、非随机、非劣效性、2 期临床试验。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 Apr;7(4):269-279. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00376-5. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
8
Safety and immunogenicity of a next-generation live-attenuated yellow fever vaccine produced in a Vero cell line in the USA: a phase 1 randomised, observer-blind, active-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial.在美国 Vero 细胞系中生产的新一代减毒活黄热病疫苗的安全性和免疫原性:一项 1 期随机、观察者盲法、主动对照、剂量范围的临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2024 Dec;24(12):1393-1402. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00406-7. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
9
Chimeric live, attenuated vaccine against Japanese encephalitis (ChimeriVax-JE): phase 2 clinical trials for safety and immunogenicity, effect of vaccine dose and schedule, and memory response to challenge with inactivated Japanese encephalitis antigen.嵌合型减毒活乙型脑炎疫苗(ChimeriVax-JE):安全性和免疫原性的2期临床试验、疫苗剂量和接种程序的效果以及对灭活乙型脑炎抗原攻击的记忆反应
J Infect Dis. 2003 Oct 15;188(8):1213-30. doi: 10.1086/378356. Epub 2003 Oct 3.
10
Safety and long-term immunogenicity of the two-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine regimen in adults in Sierra Leone: a combined open-label, non-randomised stage 1, and a randomised, double-blind, controlled stage 2 trial.在塞拉利昂成年人中,两剂腺病毒载体 26 型(Ad26.ZEBOV)和 MVA-BN-Filo 埃博拉疫苗接种方案的安全性和长期免疫原性:一项联合开放标签、非随机 1 期和随机、双盲、对照 2 期试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;22(1):97-109. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00125-0. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Human T Cell Responses to Flavivirus Vaccines.人类T细胞对黄病毒疫苗的反应。
Eur J Immunol. 2025 Aug;55(8):e70027. doi: 10.1002/eji.70027.
2
Induction of systemic and mucosal immune response against Zika virus by vaccination with non-infectious chimeric VLPs.通过接种非感染性嵌合病毒样颗粒诱导针对寨卡病毒的全身和黏膜免疫反应。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 10;15(1):24834. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07059-6.
3
From Antibodies to Immunity: Assessing Correlates of Flavivirus Protection and Cross-Reactivity.从抗体到免疫:评估黄病毒保护和交叉反应的相关因素。

本文引用的文献

1
Pre-existing Immunity to Japanese Encephalitis Virus Alters CD4 T Cell Responses to Zika Virus Inactivated Vaccine.预先存在的日本脑炎病毒免疫力改变了对寨卡病毒灭活疫苗的 CD4 T 细胞反应。
Front Immunol. 2021 Feb 24;12:640190. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.640190. eCollection 2021.
2
Zika virus infection enhances future risk of severe dengue disease.寨卡病毒感染增加了未来患严重登革热疾病的风险。
Science. 2020 Aug 28;369(6507):1123-1128. doi: 10.1126/science.abb6143.
3
Safety and immunogenicity of a Zika purified inactivated virus vaccine given via standard, accelerated, or shortened schedules: a single-centre, double-blind, sequential-group, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial.
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Apr 24;13(5):449. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050449.
4
Toll-like receptor response to Zika virus infection: progress toward infection control.Toll样受体对寨卡病毒感染的反应:感染控制方面的进展
Npj Viruses. 2025 Mar 13;3(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s44298-025-00102-3.
5
Zika virus: an overview update.寨卡病毒:最新综述
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2025 May 1;20(3):294-302. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000926. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
6
Zika virus vaccines and monoclonal antibodies: a priority agenda for research and development.寨卡病毒疫苗和单克隆抗体:研发的优先议程
Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Jul;25(7):e402-e415. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00750-3. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
7
Virus-like particle vaccine with authentic quaternary epitopes protects against Zika virus-induced viremia and testicular damage.具有真实四级表位的病毒样颗粒疫苗可预防寨卡病毒引起的病毒血症和睾丸损伤。
J Virol. 2025 Apr 15;99(4):e0232224. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02322-24. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
8
Intranasal Immunization for Zika in a Pre-Clinical Model.鼻腔免疫接种寨卡病毒的临床前模型。
Viruses. 2024 May 28;16(6):865. doi: 10.3390/v16060865.
9
Protective efficacy of a Zika purified inactivated virus vaccine candidate during pregnancy in marmosets.寨卡纯化灭活病毒候选疫苗在孕期狨猴中的保护效力
NPJ Vaccines. 2024 Feb 17;9(1):35. doi: 10.1038/s41541-024-00824-0.
通过标准、加速或缩短免疫程序接种的寨卡病毒纯化灭活疫苗的安全性和免疫原性:一项单中心、双盲、序贯组、随机、安慰剂对照的1期试验
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;20(9):1061-1070. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30085-2. Epub 2020 May 6.
4
Safety and Immunogenicity of an AS03-Adjuvanted Inactivated Tetravalent Dengue Virus Vaccine Administered on Varying Schedules to Healthy U.S. Adults: A Phase 1/2 Randomized Study.AS03 佐剂的四价灭活登革热病毒疫苗在不同时间间隔接种于健康美国成年人的安全性和免疫原性:一项 1/2 期随机研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jul;103(1):132-141. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0738. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
Potent Zika and dengue cross-neutralizing antibodies induced by Zika vaccination in a dengue-experienced donor.在一位有登革热感染史的供者中,接种 Zika 疫苗诱导产生了强效的 Zika 和登革热交叉中和抗体。
Nat Med. 2020 Feb;26(2):228-235. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0746-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
6
The Effects of Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine and Accelerated Dosing Scheduling on the Immunogenicity of the Chimeric Yellow Fever Derived Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine: A Phase II, Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Center Trial in Adults Aged 18 to 45 Years in the United States.日本脑炎疫苗和加速剂量方案对嵌合黄热衍生四价登革热疫苗免疫原性的影响:美国 18 至 45 岁成年人中进行的 II 期、随机、开放标签、单中心试验。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 16;221(7):1057-1069. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz592.
7
Pre-existing yellow fever immunity impairs and modulates the antibody response to tick-borne encephalitis vaccination.先前存在的黄热病免疫力会损害并调节对蜱传脑炎疫苗接种的抗体反应。
NPJ Vaccines. 2019 Sep 6;4:38. doi: 10.1038/s41541-019-0133-5. eCollection 2019.
8
Persistence of the immune response after vaccination with the Japanese encephalitis vaccine, IXIARO® in healthy adults: A five year follow-up study.IXIARO® 用于健康成年人的日本脑炎疫苗接种后的免疫应答持久性:一项为期五年的随访研究。
Vaccine. 2019 May 1;37(19):2529-2531. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.030. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
9
Maternal-fetal transmission and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women infected with Zika virus: prospective cohort study in French Guiana.孕妇感染寨卡病毒的母婴传播和不良围产期结局:法属圭亚那的前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2018 Oct 31;363:k4431. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4431.
10
Zika vaccines and therapeutics: landscape analysis and challenges ahead. Zika 疫苗和疗法:现状分析及未来挑战。
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 6;16(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1067-x.