• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sociodemographic Disparities in Access to Hospice and Palliative Care: An Integrative Review.社会人口学差异对临终关怀和姑息治疗的影响:综合评价。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Nov;38(11):1378-1390. doi: 10.1177/1049909120985419. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
2
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
3
Bridge the Gap: Addressing Rural End-of-Life Care Disparities and Access to Hospice Services.弥合差距:解决农村临终关怀服务差距和获得临终关怀服务的问题。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Oct;68(4):e280-e286. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
4
Barriers to palliative and hospice care utilization in older adults with cancer: A systematic review.老年癌症患者姑息治疗和临终关怀服务利用的障碍:一项系统综述
J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 Jan;11(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
5
Update in Hospice and Palliative Care.临终关怀和姑息治疗的最新进展。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Feb;23(2):165-170. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0500. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
6
The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on hospices: A systematic integrated review and synthesis of recommendations for policy and practice.新冠疫情对临终关怀机构的影响:一项系统综合综述及政策与实践建议汇总
AMRC Open Res. 2022 Oct 26;4:23. doi: 10.12688/amrcopenres.13105.1. eCollection 2022.
7
Facilitating equitable access to hospice care in socially deprived areas: A mixed methods multiple case study.促进社会贫困地区临终关怀服务的公平可及性:混合方法多案例研究。
Palliat Med. 2023 Apr;37(4):508-519. doi: 10.1177/02692163221133977. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
8
Palliative Care Development in the Asia Pacific Region: A Review of Assessment Indicators.亚太地区姑息治疗的发展:评估指标综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Nov;62(5):1008-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.04.017. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
9
Palliative care model in Thailand.泰国的缓和医疗模式。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2021 May 2;27(3):132-146. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2021.27.3.132.
10
Hospital, hospice, or home: A scoping review of the importance of place in pediatric palliative care.医院、临终关怀机构或家庭:儿科姑息治疗中地点重要性的范围综述。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Oct;21(5):925-934. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000664.

引用本文的文献

1
Overview of barriers to healthcare access: Medical deserts and individual sandboxes.医疗服务可及性障碍概述:医疗荒漠与个体“沙盒”
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jul;14(7):2608-2612. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1903_24. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
2
Association of social vulnerability with access to treatment in ovarian cancer patients.卵巢癌患者的社会脆弱性与治疗可及性的关联
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Jul 20;60:101808. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101808. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Disparities in receipt of palliative-intent treatment among disaggregated Hispanic populations with breast, lung, and prostate cancer in the United States.美国不同细分西班牙裔乳腺癌、肺癌和前列腺癌患者接受姑息治疗的差异。
Cancer. 2025 May 15;131(10):e35903. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35903.
4
" I can't do it anymore": a qualitative study on the emergence of crisis in outpatient palliative care-the perspective of family caregivers.“我再也做不到了”:一项关于门诊姑息治疗中危机出现的定性研究——家庭照顾者的视角
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 11;24(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01664-y.
5
Specialty palliative care use among cancer patients: A population-based study.癌症患者中专科姑息治疗的使用情况:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 13;20(1):e0313732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313732. eCollection 2025.
6
Palliative care is an overlooked global health priority.姑息治疗是一个被忽视的全球卫生重点。
BMJ. 2024 Nov 1;387:q2387. doi: 10.1136/bmj.q2387.
7
Home Health Care and Place of Death in Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Dementia.医疗保险受益人群中有无痴呆症患者的家庭医疗保健和死亡地点。
Gerontologist. 2024 Nov 1;64(11). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae131.
8
Economic Value of Unpaid Family Caregiver Time Following Hospital Discharge and at End of Life.经济价值:住院出院后和临终时无偿家庭护理人员时间
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Dec;68(6):632-640.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.08.030. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
9
Use of Palliative Care Among Adults With Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure: Insights From a US National Insured Patient Sample.新诊断心力衰竭成人中姑息治疗的使用:来自美国全国参保患者样本的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 3;13(17):e035459. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035459. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
10
Living and dying between cultural traditions in African & Caribbean Heritage families: a constructivist grounded theory.在非裔加勒比传统家庭中生活和死亡:建构主义扎根理论。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jul 18;23(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01503-6.

本文引用的文献

1
A Call to Action to Address Disparities in Palliative Care Access: A Conceptual Framework for Individualizing Care Needs.呼吁行动起来,解决姑息治疗可及性方面的差异:个体化护理需求的概念框架。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;24(2):177-180. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0435. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
2
Methods for overcoming barriers in palliative care for ethnic/racial minorities: a systematic review.克服少数民族姑息治疗障碍的方法:系统评价。
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Dec;17(6):697-706. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000403.
3
"Just too busy living in the moment and surviving": barriers to accessing health care for structurally vulnerable populations at end-of-life.“只顾活在当下,勉强求生”:结构脆弱人群临终前获得医疗保健的障碍。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 26;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0396-7.
4
Racial and ethnic differences in end-of-life care in the United States: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS).美国临终关怀中的种族和民族差异:来自健康与退休研究(HRS)的证据。
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Nov 30;7:100331. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.100331. eCollection 2019 Apr.
5
Statewide Differences in Personality Associated with Geographic Disparities in Access to Palliative Care: Findings on Openness.全州范围内人格差异与姑息治疗可及性地理差异相关:开放性方面的发现。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Jun;22(6):628-634. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0206. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
6
Stakeholder Perspectives on the Use of Community Health Workers To Improve Palliative Care Use by African Americans with Cancer.利益相关者对利用社区卫生工作者改善非裔美国人癌症患者姑息治疗使用的看法。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;22(3):302-306. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0366. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
7
Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Healthcare Intensity at the End of Life.种族/民族、社会经济地位与生命终末期的医疗强度。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;21(9):1308-1316. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0011. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
8
Barriers to Hospice Care in Trauma Patients: The Disparities in End-of-Life Care.创伤患者临终关怀的障碍:临终关怀中的差异
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Aug;35(8):1081-1084. doi: 10.1177/1049909117753377. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
9
Quality Of End-Of-Life Care Is Higher In The VA Compared To Care Paid For By Traditional Medicare.退伍军人事务部提供的临终关怀质量比传统医疗保险支付的关怀质量更高。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jan;37(1):95-103. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0883.
10
Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers.为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别(LGBT)癌症患者及其护理人员提供的姑息治疗和临终关怀。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2018 Feb;34(1):60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

社会人口学差异对临终关怀和姑息治疗的影响:综合评价。

Sociodemographic Disparities in Access to Hospice and Palliative Care: An Integrative Review.

机构信息

15851Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Nov;38(11):1378-1390. doi: 10.1177/1049909120985419. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1177/1049909120985419
PMID:33423532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8514114/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence of disparities in access to hospice and palliative care services to varying degrees by sociodemographic groups. Underlying factors contributing to access issues have received little systematic attention.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize current literature on disparities in access to hospice and palliative care, highlight the range of sociodemographic groups affected by these inequities, characterize the domains of access addressed, and outline implications for research, policy, and clinical practice.

DESIGN

An integrative review comprised a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases, which was conducted from inception to March 2020 for studies outlining disparities in hospice and palliative care access in the United States. Data were analyzed using critical synthesis within the context of a health care accessibility conceptual framework. Included studies were appraised on methodological quality and quality of reporting.

RESULTS

Of the articles included, 80% employed non-experimental study designs. Study measures varied, but 70% of studies described differences in outcomes by race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status. Others revealed disparate access based on variables such as age, gender, and geographic location. Overall synthesis highlighted evidence of disparities spanning 5 domains of access: Approachability, Acceptability, Availability, Affordability, and Appropriateness; 60% of studies primarily emphasized Acceptability, Affordability, and Appropriateness.

CONCLUSIONS

This integrative review highlights the need to consider various stakeholder perspectives and attitudes at the individual, provider, and system levels going forward, to target and address access issues spanning all domains.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,不同社会人口群体在获得临终关怀和姑息治疗服务方面存在程度不同的差异。导致这些问题的根本因素很少受到系统关注。

目的

综合目前关于临终关怀和姑息治疗服务可及性差异的文献,强调受这些不公平待遇影响的各种社会人口群体范围,描述所涉及的可及性领域,并概述对研究、政策和临床实践的影响。

设计

综合回顾包括对 PubMed、Embase 和 CINAHL 数据库的系统检索,从成立到 2020 年 3 月进行,以查找概述美国临终关怀和姑息治疗可及性差异的研究。使用医疗保健可及性概念框架背景下的批判性综合方法分析数据。纳入的研究根据方法学质量和报告质量进行评估。

结果

在所纳入的文章中,80%采用了非实验性研究设计。研究措施各不相同,但 70%的研究描述了种族、民族或社会经济地位差异对结果的影响。其他研究则根据年龄、性别和地理位置等变量揭示了不同的可及性。总体综合强调了跨越可及性的 5 个领域的证据:可接近性、可接受性、可用性、可负担性和适当性;60%的研究主要强调了可接受性、可负担性和适当性。

结论

本次综合回顾强调,需要考虑个人、提供者和系统各级的各种利益相关者的观点和态度,以针对和解决跨越所有领域的可及性问题。