15851Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Nov;38(11):1378-1390. doi: 10.1177/1049909120985419. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
There is growing evidence of disparities in access to hospice and palliative care services to varying degrees by sociodemographic groups. Underlying factors contributing to access issues have received little systematic attention.
To synthesize current literature on disparities in access to hospice and palliative care, highlight the range of sociodemographic groups affected by these inequities, characterize the domains of access addressed, and outline implications for research, policy, and clinical practice.
An integrative review comprised a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases, which was conducted from inception to March 2020 for studies outlining disparities in hospice and palliative care access in the United States. Data were analyzed using critical synthesis within the context of a health care accessibility conceptual framework. Included studies were appraised on methodological quality and quality of reporting.
Of the articles included, 80% employed non-experimental study designs. Study measures varied, but 70% of studies described differences in outcomes by race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status. Others revealed disparate access based on variables such as age, gender, and geographic location. Overall synthesis highlighted evidence of disparities spanning 5 domains of access: Approachability, Acceptability, Availability, Affordability, and Appropriateness; 60% of studies primarily emphasized Acceptability, Affordability, and Appropriateness.
This integrative review highlights the need to consider various stakeholder perspectives and attitudes at the individual, provider, and system levels going forward, to target and address access issues spanning all domains.
越来越多的证据表明,不同社会人口群体在获得临终关怀和姑息治疗服务方面存在程度不同的差异。导致这些问题的根本因素很少受到系统关注。
综合目前关于临终关怀和姑息治疗服务可及性差异的文献,强调受这些不公平待遇影响的各种社会人口群体范围,描述所涉及的可及性领域,并概述对研究、政策和临床实践的影响。
综合回顾包括对 PubMed、Embase 和 CINAHL 数据库的系统检索,从成立到 2020 年 3 月进行,以查找概述美国临终关怀和姑息治疗可及性差异的研究。使用医疗保健可及性概念框架背景下的批判性综合方法分析数据。纳入的研究根据方法学质量和报告质量进行评估。
在所纳入的文章中,80%采用了非实验性研究设计。研究措施各不相同,但 70%的研究描述了种族、民族或社会经济地位差异对结果的影响。其他研究则根据年龄、性别和地理位置等变量揭示了不同的可及性。总体综合强调了跨越可及性的 5 个领域的证据:可接近性、可接受性、可用性、可负担性和适当性;60%的研究主要强调了可接受性、可负担性和适当性。
本次综合回顾强调,需要考虑个人、提供者和系统各级的各种利益相关者的观点和态度,以针对和解决跨越所有领域的可及性问题。