Department of Heart Failure & Cardiac Imaging, School of Medicine, Sydney Medical School, Werribee Mercy Sub School, Werribee, Australia.
Department of Cardiology, Safer Care Victoria, St Vincents Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(5):e160721190003. doi: 10.2174/1573403X16666210108104945.
Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) is an emerging epidemic. Within one generation, the medical community has learned much of CHF syndromes. It has two distinct mechanisms, systolic and diastolic abnormalities, to account for the common CHF presentation. It is complex as it challenges the available health care services, resource, and funding models in providing an equitable service across the health continuum. Despite the improvement in many cardiovascular diseases, some CHF outcomes like readmissions and costs have increased. The reinvigoration of evidence- based medicine, the development of health services models of care, and standardisation of disease processes with taxonomies have also occurred within the same time span. These processes, however, need to be linked with health policy as presented in white papers. In this paper, we explore achieving optimal CHF guideline-recommended outcomes as the science approaches realworld translation.
充血性心力衰竭(CHF)是一种正在出现的流行疾病。在一代人的时间里,医学界已经了解了很多 CHF 综合征。它有两种截然不同的机制,即收缩期和舒张期异常,用于解释常见的 CHF 表现。它很复杂,因为它挑战了现有的医疗保健服务、资源和资金模式,在整个医疗保健连续体中提供公平的服务。尽管许多心血管疾病的治疗效果有所改善,但一些 CHF 结果,如再入院和成本,却有所增加。在同一时期内,循证医学的复兴、医疗服务模式的发展以及疾病过程的分类标准化也已经发生。然而,这些过程需要与白皮书所呈现的卫生政策联系起来。在本文中,我们探讨了在科学接近真实世界的转化过程中,如何实现充血性心力衰竭指南推荐的最佳结果。