• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超临界储层中二氧化碳的下沉

Sinking CO in Supercritical Reservoirs.

作者信息

Parisio Francesco, Vilarrasa Victor

机构信息

Chair of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Institute of Geotechnics Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg Freiberg Germany.

Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA) Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) Barcelona Spain.

出版信息

Geophys Res Lett. 2020 Dec 16;47(23):e2020GL090456. doi: 10.1029/2020GL090456. Epub 2020 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1029/2020GL090456
PMID:33424049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7780548/
Abstract

Geologic carbon storage is required for achieving negative CO emissions to deal with the climate crisis. The classical concept of CO storage consists in injecting CO in geological formations at depths greater than 800 m, where CO becomes a dense fluid, minimizing storage volume. Yet CO has a density lower than the resident brine and tends to float, challenging the widespread deployment of geologic carbon storage. Here, we propose for the first time to store CO in supercritical reservoirs to reduce the buoyancy-driven leakage risk. Supercritical reservoirs are found at drilling-reachable depth in volcanic areas, where high pressure ( > 21.8 MPa) and temperature ( > 374°C) imply CO is denser than water. We estimate that a CO storage capacity in the range of 50-500 Mt yr could be achieved for every 100 injection wells. Carbon storage in supercritical reservoirs is an appealing alternative to the traditional approach.

摘要

为应对气候危机实现负碳排放,地质碳储存是必要的。传统的碳储存概念是将二氧化碳注入深度大于800米的地质构造中,在那里二氧化碳变成一种致密流体,从而使储存体积最小化。然而,二氧化碳的密度低于原地盐水,容易上浮,这对地质碳储存的广泛应用构成了挑战。在此,我们首次提出将二氧化碳储存在超临界储层中,以降低浮力驱动的泄漏风险。超临界储层在火山地区的可钻探深度被发现,那里的高压(>21.8兆帕)和高温(>374°C)意味着二氧化碳比水密度大。我们估计,每100口注入井每年可实现50-500百万吨的二氧化碳储存能力。在超临界储层中进行碳储存是传统方法的一个有吸引力的替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/7780548/be991c709c0c/GRL-47-e2020GL090456-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/7780548/d27f69a6a300/GRL-47-e2020GL090456-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/7780548/29ab41caf7a4/GRL-47-e2020GL090456-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/7780548/f1a5afb2421b/GRL-47-e2020GL090456-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/7780548/be991c709c0c/GRL-47-e2020GL090456-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/7780548/d27f69a6a300/GRL-47-e2020GL090456-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/7780548/29ab41caf7a4/GRL-47-e2020GL090456-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/7780548/f1a5afb2421b/GRL-47-e2020GL090456-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/7780548/be991c709c0c/GRL-47-e2020GL090456-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Sinking CO in Supercritical Reservoirs.超临界储层中二氧化碳的下沉
Geophys Res Lett. 2020 Dec 16;47(23):e2020GL090456. doi: 10.1029/2020GL090456. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
2
Biosurfactant as an Enhancer of Geologic Carbon Storage: Microbial Modification of Interfacial Tension and Contact Angle in Carbon dioxide/Water/Quartz Systems.生物表面活性剂作为地质碳储存的增强剂:二氧化碳/水/石英体系中界面张力和接触角的微生物改性
Front Microbiol. 2017 Jul 11;8:1285. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01285. eCollection 2017.
3
Influence of Chemical, Mechanical, and Transport Processes on Wellbore Leakage from Geologic CO Storage Reservoirs.化学、机械和传输过程对地质 CO2 储存库井筒泄漏的影响。
Acc Chem Res. 2017 Aug 15;50(8):1829-1837. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00094. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
4
Leakage of CO from geological storage and its impacts on fresh soil-water systems: a review.CO 从地质储存中的泄漏及其对新鲜土壤-水系统的影响:综述。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):12995-13018. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08203-7. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
5
Experimental Analysis and Numerical Simulation of the Stability of Geological Storage of CO: A Case Study of Transforming a Depleted Gas Reservoir into a Carbon Sink Carrier.CO地质封存稳定性的实验分析与数值模拟:以枯竭气藏转化为碳汇载体为例
ACS Omega. 2021 Dec 6;6(50):34832-34841. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05475. eCollection 2021 Dec 21.
6
Relative permeability experiments of carbon dioxide displacing brine and their implications for carbon sequestration.二氧化碳驱替盐水的相对渗透率实验及其对碳封存的意义。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(1):811-8. doi: 10.1021/es401549e. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
7
Multiwell CO2 injectivity: impact of boundary conditions and brine extraction on geologic CO2 storage efficiency and pressure buildup.多井 CO2 注入能力:边界条件和卤水提取对地质 CO2 存储效率和压力积累的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jan 21;48(2):1067-74. doi: 10.1021/es4017014. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
8
Capillary pressure-saturation relations for supercritical CO2 and brine in limestone/dolomite sands: implications for geologic carbon sequestration in carbonate reservoirs.超临界 CO2 与盐水在石灰岩/白云岩砂中的毛细压力-饱和度关系:对碳酸盐岩储层中地质碳封存的启示。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jun 16;49(12):7208-17. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00826. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
9
Rate of CO2 attack on hydrated Class H well cement under geologic sequestration conditions.地质封存条件下水化H级油井水泥的二氧化碳侵蚀速率。
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Aug 15;42(16):6237-42. doi: 10.1021/es800049r.
10
Shallow Geologic Storage of Carbon to Remove Atmospheric CO and Reduce Flood Risk.浅地层地质封存碳以去除大气中的 CO 和降低洪灾风险。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Jun 13;57(23):8536-8547. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00600. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Cooling-induced reactivation of distant faults during long-term geothermal energy production in hot sedimentary aquifers.在热沉积含水层中进行长期地热能生产时,冷却会引发远距离断层重新活动。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 8;12(1):2065. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06067-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The risks of long-term re-injection in supercritical geothermal systems.在超临界地热系统中进行长期回注的风险。
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 26;10(1):4391. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12146-0.
2
Cloud-fracture networks as a means of accessing superhot geothermal energy.云裂网络作为获取超高温地热能的一种手段。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):939. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37634-z.
3
The brittle-ductile transition in active volcanoes.活火山中的脆-韧性转变。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 15;9(1):143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36505-x.
4
Estimating geological CO storage security to deliver on climate mitigation.评估地质 CO2 储存的安全性,以实现气候缓解目标。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 12;9(1):2201. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04423-1.
5
Geologic carbon storage is unlikely to trigger large earthquakes and reactivate faults through which CO2 could leak.地质碳封存不太可能引发大地震或重新激活可能导致二氧化碳泄漏的断层。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 12;112(19):5938-43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413284112. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
6
Geochemistry. Carbon storage in basalt.地球化学。玄武岩中的碳储存。
Science. 2014 Apr 25;344(6182):373-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1250828.
7
Pure and Pseudo-pure Fluid Thermophysical Property Evaluation and the Open-Source Thermophysical Property Library CoolProp.纯流体和准纯流体热物理性质评估与开源热物理性质库CoolProp
Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014 Feb 12;53(6):2498-2508. doi: 10.1021/ie4033999. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
8
Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxide.地震引发与二氧化碳的大规模地质储存
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 26;109(26):10164-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202473109. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
9
Model for CO2 leakage including multiple geological layers and multiple leaky wells.包含多个地质层和多个泄漏井的二氧化碳泄漏模型。
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Feb 1;43(3):743-9. doi: 10.1021/es801135v.