J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;109(1):84-89. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1005.
With the mandate to review all available literature in the study's inclusion parameters, systematic review projects are likely to require full-text access to a significant number of articles that are not available in a library's collection, thereby necessitating ordering content via interlibrary loan (ILL). The aim of this study is to understand what effect a systematic review service has on the copyright royalty fees accompanying ILL requests at an academic health sciences library.
The library created a custom report using ILLiad data to look specifically at 2018 ILL borrowing requests that were known to be part of systematic reviews. This subset of borrowing activity was then analyzed to determine its impact on the library's copyright royalty expenditures for the year. In 2018, copyright eligible borrowing requests that were known to be part of systematic reviews represented only approximately 5% of total filled requests that involved copyright eligible borrowing. However, these systematic review requests directly or indirectly caused approximately 10% of all the Spencer S. Eccles Library copyright royalty expenditures for 2018 requests.
Based on the sample data set, the library's copyright royalty expenditures did increase, but the overall financial impact was modest.
由于系统评价项目的任务是审查研究纳入参数中所有可用的文献，因此可能需要全文访问大量不在图书馆馆藏范围内的文章，从而需要通过馆际互借（ILL）订购内容。本研究旨在了解系统评价服务对学术健康科学图书馆 ILL 请求伴随的版权版税费用的影响。
图书馆使用 ILLiad 数据创建了一份定制报告，专门研究已知属于系统评价的 2018 年 ILL 借阅请求。然后分析该借阅活动子集，以确定其对图书馆当年版权版税支出的影响。2018 年，已知属于系统评价的版权合格借阅请求仅占涉及版权合格借阅的总已完成请求的约 5%。然而，这些系统评价请求直接或间接地导致了 2018 年所有斯宾塞·S·埃克尔斯图书馆版权版税支出的约 10%。
根据样本数据集，图书馆的版权版税支出确实增加了，但总体财务影响不大。
