J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jul 1;110(3):348-357. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1452.
The study purpose was to understand how early months of the COVID-19 pandemic altered interlibrary loan (ILL) and document delivery (DD) in North American health science libraries (HSLs), specifically the decision-making and workflow adjustments associated with accessing their own collections and obtaining content not available via ILL.
Researchers distributed an online 26-question survey through 24 health science library email lists from January 6-February 7, 2021. Respondents reported their library's ILL and DD activities from March-August 2020, including ILL/DD usage and policies, collection access, decision-making, and workflow adjustments. In addition to calculating frequencies, cross-tabulation and statistical tests were performed to test a priori potential associations. Two researchers independently and thematically analyzed responses to the 2 open-ended questions and reached consensus on themes.
Hospital libraries represented 52% (n=226/431) of respondents, along with 42% academic (n=179) and 6% (n=26) multi-type or other special. Only 1% (n=5) closed completely with no remote services, but many, 45% (n=194), ceased ILL of print materials. More than half (n=246/423; 58%) agreed that ILL requests likely to be filled from print remained unfilled more than is typical. Open-ended questions yielded 5 themes on ILL/DD staffing, setup, and systems; 6 on impacts for libraries and library users.
Lack of communication regarding collection availability and staffing resulted in delayed or unfilled requests. Hospital and academic libraries made similar decisions about continuing services but reported different experiences in areas such as purchasing digital content. Hybrid ILL/DD workflows may continue for managing these services.
本研究旨在了解 COVID-19 大流行早期对北美卫生科学图书馆(HSL)的馆际互借(ILL)和文献传递(DD)的影响,特别是与访问本馆馆藏和获取无法通过 ILL 获取的内容相关的决策和工作流程调整。
研究人员于 2021 年 1 月 6 日至 2 月 7 日通过 24 个卫生科学图书馆电子邮件列表分发了一份 26 个问题的在线调查。受访者报告了他们的图书馆在 2020 年 3 月至 8 月期间的 ILL 和 DD 活动,包括 ILL/DD 使用情况和政策、馆藏访问、决策和工作流程调整。除了计算频率外,还进行了交叉表和统计检验,以检验预先确定的潜在关联。两名研究人员独立地对两个开放式问题的回答进行了主题分析,并就主题达成了共识。
医院图书馆占受访者的 52%(n=226/431),学术图书馆占 42%(n=179),6%(n=26)为多类型或其他特殊类型。只有 1%(n=5)的图书馆完全关闭且没有远程服务,但许多图书馆(n=194,45%)停止了印刷材料的 ILL。超过一半的受访者(n=246/423;58%)认为,可能通过印刷材料满足的 ILL 请求未得到满足的情况比通常情况下更为常见。开放式问题产生了关于 ILL/DD 人员配备、设置和系统的 5 个主题;关于图书馆和图书馆用户的影响的 6 个主题。
由于缺乏有关馆藏可用性和人员配备的沟通,导致请求延迟或未得到满足。医院和学术图书馆在继续提供服务方面做出了类似的决策,但在购买数字内容等方面报告了不同的经验。混合的 ILL/DD 工作流程可能会继续用于管理这些服务。