Cruz-Garza Jesus G, Sujatha Ravindran Akshay, Kopteva Anastasiya E, Rivera Garza Cristina, Contreras-Vidal Jose L
Laboratory for Non-Invasive Brain-Machine Interface Systems, NSF IUCRC BRAIN, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Department of Hispanic Studies, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Dec 7;14:577651. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.577651. eCollection 2020.
Two stages of the creative writing process were characterized through mobile scalp electroencephalography (EEG) in a 16-week creative writing workshop. Portable dry EEG systems (four channels: TP09, AF07, AF08, TP10) with synchronized head acceleration, video recordings, and journal entries, recorded mobile brain-body activity of Spanish heritage students. Each student's brain-body activity was recorded as they experienced spaces in Houston, Texas ("Preparation" stage), and while they worked on their creative texts ("Generation" stage). We used Generalized Partial Directed Coherence (gPDC) to compare the functional connectivity among both stages. There was a trend of higher gPDC in the Preparation stage from right temporo-parietal (TP10) to left anterior-frontal (AF07) brain scalp areas within 1-50 Hz, not reaching statistical significance. The opposite directionality was found for the Generation stage, with statistical significant differences ( < 0.05) restricted to the delta band (1-4 Hz). There was statistically higher gPDC observed for the inter-hemispheric connections AF07-AF08 in the delta and theta bands (1-8 Hz), and AF08 to TP09 in the alpha and beta (8-30 Hz) bands. The left anterior-frontal (AF07) recordings showed higher power localized to the gamma band (32-50 Hz) for the Generation stage. An ancillary analysis of Sample Entropy did not show significant difference. The information transfer from anterior-frontal to temporal-parietal areas of the scalp may reflect multisensory interpretation during the Preparation stage, while brain signals originating at temporal-parietal toward frontal locations during the Generation stage may reflect the final decision making process to translate the multisensory experience into a creative text.
在一个为期16周的创意写作工作坊中,通过移动头皮脑电图(EEG)对创意写作过程的两个阶段进行了特征描述。便携式干式EEG系统(四个通道:TP09、AF07、AF08、TP10)与同步的头部加速度、视频记录和日记条目一起,记录了西班牙裔学生的移动脑体活动。在每位学生体验德克萨斯州休斯顿的空间时(“准备”阶段)以及他们创作创意文本时(“生成”阶段),记录其脑体活动。我们使用广义偏相干分析(gPDC)来比较两个阶段之间的功能连接性。在准备阶段,从右颞顶叶(TP10)到左前额叶(AF07)头皮区域在1 - 50赫兹范围内存在gPDC升高的趋势,但未达到统计学显著性。在生成阶段发现了相反的方向性,统计学显著差异(<0.05)局限于δ波段(1 - 4赫兹)。在δ和θ波段(1 - 8赫兹),半球间连接AF07 - AF08以及在α和β波段(8 - 30赫兹)AF08到TP09观察到统计学上更高的gPDC。在生成阶段,左前额叶(AF07)记录显示γ波段(32 - 50赫兹)的功率更高。样本熵的辅助分析未显示出显著差异。从头皮的前额叶到颞顶叶区域的信息传递可能反映了准备阶段的多感官解读,而在生成阶段从颞顶叶向额叶位置起源的脑信号可能反映了将多感官体验转化为创意文本的最终决策过程。