• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病爆发期间对强化恐惧与减轻恐惧新闻的偏好的年龄差异。

Age Differences in Preferences for Fear-Enhancing Vs. Fear-Reducing News in a Disease Outbreak.

作者信息

Villalba Anthony A, Stanley Jennifer Tehan, Turner Jennifer R, Vale Michael T, Houston Michelle L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Akron, Akron, OH, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 23;11:589390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589390. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589390
PMID:33424705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7785806/
Abstract

Older adults (OA) prefer positive over negative information in a lab setting, compared to young adults (YA; i.e., ). The extent to which OA avoid negative events or information relevant for their health and safety is not clear. We first investigated age differences in preferences for fear-enhancing vs. fear-reducing news articles during the Ebola Outbreak of 2014. We were able to collect data from 15 YA and 13 OA during this acute health event. Compared to YA, OA were more likely to read the fear-enhancing article, select hand-sanitizer over lip balm, and reported greater fear of Ebola. We further investigated our research question during the COVID-19 pandemic with 164 YA (18-30 years) and 171 OA (60-80 years). Participants responded to an online survey about the COVID-19 pandemic across 13 days during the initial peak of the pandemic in the United States (U.S.). Both YA and OA preferred to read positive over negative news about the coronavirus, but OA were even more likely than YA to prefer the positive news article. No age differences in the fear of contraction were found, but OA engaged in more health-protective behaviors compared to YA. Although OA may not always report greater fear than YA or seek out negative information related to a health concern, they still engage in protective health behaviors. Thus, although were observed in attention and emotional reports (in the COVID-19 study), OA still modified their behaviors more than YA (giveaway in both studies, and health-protective behavior change in the COVID-19 study), suggesting that positivity effects did not hamper OA ability to respond to a health crisis.

摘要

与年轻人(YA)相比,老年人(OA)在实验室环境中更喜欢积极信息而非消极信息。目前尚不清楚老年人在多大程度上会回避与他们的健康和安全相关的负面事件或信息。我们首先调查了在2014年埃博拉疫情期间,老年人和年轻人对增强恐惧与减轻恐惧的新闻文章的偏好差异。在这一急性健康事件期间,我们收集了15名年轻人和13名老年人的数据。与年轻人相比,老年人更有可能阅读增强恐惧的文章,选择洗手液而非唇膏,并报告对埃博拉的恐惧更大。在新冠疫情期间,我们对164名年轻人(18 - 30岁)和171名老年人(60 - 80岁)进一步研究了我们的研究问题。在美国疫情初期高峰的13天里,参与者对一项关于新冠疫情的在线调查做出了回应。年轻人和老年人都更喜欢阅读关于冠状病毒的积极新闻而非消极新闻,但老年人比年轻人更倾向于选择积极的新闻文章。在感染恐惧方面未发现年龄差异,但与年轻人相比,老年人采取了更多的健康保护行为。尽管老年人可能并不总是比年轻人报告更大的恐惧,也不会主动寻找与健康问题相关的负面信息,但他们仍然会采取保护健康的行为。因此,尽管在注意力和情绪报告方面(在新冠疫情研究中)观察到了差异,但老年人比年轻人更多地改变了他们的行为(两项研究中的赠品,以及新冠疫情研究中的健康保护行为变化),这表明积极效应并未妨碍老年人应对健康危机的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2b/7785806/917b205c27de/fpsyg-11-589390-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2b/7785806/b0ad5653a918/fpsyg-11-589390-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2b/7785806/ae1c61743cbe/fpsyg-11-589390-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2b/7785806/917b205c27de/fpsyg-11-589390-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2b/7785806/b0ad5653a918/fpsyg-11-589390-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2b/7785806/ae1c61743cbe/fpsyg-11-589390-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2b/7785806/917b205c27de/fpsyg-11-589390-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Age Differences in Preferences for Fear-Enhancing Vs. Fear-Reducing News in a Disease Outbreak.疾病爆发期间对强化恐惧与减轻恐惧新闻的偏好的年龄差异。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 23;11:589390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589390. eCollection 2020.
2
Desensitization to Fear-Inducing COVID-19 Health News on Twitter: Observational Study.推特上对引发恐惧的新冠疫情健康新闻的脱敏:观察性研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2021 Jul 16;1(1):e26876. doi: 10.2196/26876. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea.推特上的对话与医学新闻框架:韩国新冠肺炎信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e18897. doi: 10.2196/18897.
4
How COVID-19 News Affect Older Adults' Mental Health-Evidence of a Positivity Bias.新冠疫情相关新闻如何影响老年人心理健康——正性偏向的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):3950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053950.
5
Neurophysiological correlates of age differences in driving behavior during concurrent subtask performance.同时进行子任务时,驾驶行为的年龄差异的神经生理学相关性。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 15;225:117492. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117492. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
6
Older and younger adults' first impressions from faces: similar in agreement but different in positivity.老年人和年轻人对面孔的第一印象:一致性较高,但积极度不同。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Mar;28(1):202-12. doi: 10.1037/a0030927. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
7
The AGE Effect on Protective Behaviors During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Sociodemographic, Perceptions and Psychological Accounts.年龄对新冠疫情期间防护行为的影响:社会人口学、认知及心理学因素分析
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 16;11:561785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561785. eCollection 2020.
8
What Media Helps, What Media Hurts: A Mixed Methods Survey Study of Coping with COVID-19 Using the Media Repertoire Framework and the Appraisal Theory of Stress.何种媒体有益,何种媒体有害:一项运用媒体库框架和应激评估理论应对新冠疫情的混合方法调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 6;22(8):e20186. doi: 10.2196/20186.
9
The Metabolic Cost of Walking in healthy young and older adults - A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.健康年轻成年人和老年人步行的代谢成本——系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 10;9(1):9956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45602-4.
10
Misinformation and the US Ebola communication crisis: analyzing the veracity and content of social media messages related to a fear-inducing infectious disease outbreak.错误信息与美国埃博拉疫情传播危机:分析与引发恐慌的传染病爆发相关的社交媒体信息的真实性和内容
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 7;20(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08697-3.

引用本文的文献

1
How COVID-19 News Affect Older Adults' Mental Health-Evidence of a Positivity Bias.新冠疫情相关新闻如何影响老年人心理健康——正性偏向的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):3950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053950.
2
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Adult Iraqi Population Towards COVID-19 Booster Dose: A Cross-Sectional Study.伊拉克成年人群对新冠病毒加强针的知识、态度和行为:一项横断面研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Jun 23;16:1525-1537. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S370124. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 Worries and Behavior Changes in Older and Younger Men and Women.新冠疫情下老年男性、老年女性、年轻男性和年轻女性的担忧和行为变化。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):e17-e23. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa068.
2
Recovering from the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Focus on Older Adults.从 COVID-19 大流行中恢复:关注老年人。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):526-535. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1759758. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
3
Neural mechanisms of decision-making in aging.衰老过程中决策的神经机制。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;11(1):e1519. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1519. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
4
Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk.在线panel 调查在社会科学研究中的运用:超越 Mechanical Turk 的抽样方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):2022-2038. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7.
5
The positivity effect: a negativity bias in youth fades with age.积极效应:年轻人的消极偏见会随着年龄增长而消退。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Feb;19:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
6
It gets better with time: Enhancement of age-related positivity effect in the six months following a highly negative public event.随着时间推移会变得更好:在高度负面公共事件发生后的六个月内,与年龄相关的正性效应增强。
Psychol Aging. 2018 May;33(3):419-424. doi: 10.1037/pag0000250.
7
How Message Fatigue toward Health Messages Leads to Ineffective Persuasive Outcomes: Examining the Mediating Roles of Reactance and Inattention.健康信息的信息疲劳如何导致无效的说服效果:检验反应和注意力不集中的中介作用。
J Health Commun. 2018;23(1):109-116. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1414900. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
8
Caring more and knowing more reduces age-related differences in emotion perception.更多的关爱和更多的了解可以减少与年龄相关的情绪感知差异。
Psychol Aging. 2015 Jun;30(2):383-395. doi: 10.1037/pag0000028.
9
Moderating effects of media exposure on associations between socioeconomic position and cancer worry.媒体接触对社会经济地位与癌症担忧之间关联的调节作用。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(14):5845-51. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.14.5845.
10
Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: age differences in preferences for positive over negative information.年龄相关正性效应的元分析:对正性信息与负性信息的偏好随年龄差异的变化。
Psychol Aging. 2014 Mar;29(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/a0035194.