• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Creativity and its determinants among medical students.医学生的创造力及其决定因素。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Nov 26;9:320. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_279_20. eCollection 2020.
2
Factors affecting nursing students' creativity in Taiwan: Exploring the moderating role of creative personality.影响台湾护理专业学生创造力的因素:探究创造性人格的调节作用。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Feb 10;88:104367. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104367.
3
Thinking Style Moderates the Impact of the Classroom Environment on Language Creativity.思维方式调节课堂环境对语言创造力的影响。
J Intell. 2024 Jan 8;12(1):5. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12010005.
4
The role of critical thinking skills and learning styles of university students in their academic performance.大学生的批判性思维能力和学习风格在其学业成绩中的作用。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2014 Jul;2(3):95-102.
5
Technical Simulation Using Goldfish Bowl Method: A Medical Teaching Method for Increasing Student's Creativity.金鱼缸法技术模拟:一种提高学生创造力的医学教学方法。
Arch Iran Med. 2020 Jan 1;23(1):37-43.
6
Scientific creativity and innovation ability and its determinants among medical postgraduate students in Fujian province of China: a cross sectional study.中国福建省医学生研究生的科学创造力和创新能力及其决定因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04408-9.
7
The effectiveness of teaching strategies for creativity in a nursing concepts teaching protocol on the creative thinking of two-year RN-BSN students.护理概念教学方案中培养创造力的教学策略对两年制护理学学士后护理学专业学生创造性思维的有效性。
J Nurs Res. 2002 Jun;10(2):105-12. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000347589.98025.63.
8
Dimensions of Creativity in Secondary School High-Ability Students.中学高能力学生的创造力维度
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Aug 24;11(3):953-961. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11030070.
9
Exploring creativity and critical thinking in traditional and innovative problem-based learning groups.探究传统与创新问题导向学习小组中的创造力和批判性思维。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Aug;22(15-16):2298-307. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12186. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
10
Relationship between information literacy and creativity: a study of students at the isfahan university of medical sciences.信息素养与创造力之间的关系:对伊斯法罕医科大学学生的一项研究。
Mater Sociomed. 2013;25(1):28-31. doi: 10.5455/msm.2013.25.28-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating creativity and learning style preferences in anesthesia students.探究麻醉专业学生的创造力和学习风格偏好。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 May 30;14:218. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1355_24. eCollection 2025.
2
Creativity research in medicine and nursing: A scoping review.医学与护理领域的创造力研究:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 8;20(1):e0317209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317209. eCollection 2025.
3
The power of laughter: a study on humor and creativity in undergraduate nursing education in Egypt.笑的力量:埃及本科护理教育中的幽默与创造力研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 22;23(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01913-0.
4
Scientific creativity and innovation ability and its determinants among medical postgraduate students in Fujian province of China: a cross sectional study.中国福建省医学生研究生的科学创造力和创新能力及其决定因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04408-9.
5
A study of the effects of blended learning on university students' critical thinking: A systematic review.混合式学习对大学生批判性思维影响的研究:一项系统综述。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Mar 31;12:95. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_665_22. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotional Creativity as Predictor of Intrinsic Motivation and Academic Engagement in University Students: The Mediating Role of Positive Emotions.情绪创造力对大学生内在动机和学业投入的预测作用:积极情绪的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 25;7:1243. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01243. eCollection 2016.
2
Creativity in Medical Education: The Value of Having Medical Students Make Stuff.医学教育中的创造力:让医学生动手制作的价值。
J Med Humanit. 2016 Dec;37(4):475-483. doi: 10.1007/s10912-016-9397-1.
3
A systematic review of creative thinking/creativity in nursing education.对护理教育中的创造性思维/创造力的系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Nov;33(11):1382-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.09.005. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
4
Job satisfaction and its influential factors.工作满意度及其影响因素。
J Res Health Sci. 2010 Jun 24;10(1):42-6.
5
Exploring critical thinking in critical care nursing education: a pilot study.
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2008 Jan;39(1):28-33. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20080101-08.
6
The cognitive neuroscience of creativity.创造力的认知神经科学
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1011-26. doi: 10.3758/bf03196731.
7
Promoting creativity in nursing education.促进护理教育中的创造力。
Nurs Res. 1979 Mar-Apr;28(2):115-9.

医学生的创造力及其决定因素。

Creativity and its determinants among medical students.

作者信息

Amiri Mohammad, Khosravi Ahmad, Chaman Reza, Sadeghi Zakieh, Raei Mehdi

机构信息

Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.

Center for Health Related Social and Behavioral Sciences Research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Nov 26;9:320. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_279_20. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_279_20
PMID:33426124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7774634/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The ultimate goal of education at all levels is the ability to generate and foster students' creativity. This study aimed at determining and comparing creativity and its influencing factors among medical students.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study conducted in 2019, 720 medical students in Shahroud public and private universities were selected and studied through stratified cluster random sampling. Data were collected using the Guilford Creativity Questionnaire. The data were analyzed using Chi-square, Pearson correlation coefficient, -test, and multiple logistic regression with a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean creativity score of the students was 131.4 ± 13.8. The mean creativity scores on the fluency, elaboration, originality, and flexibility dimensions were 49.2 ± 5.3, 22.1 ± 3.4, 34.8 ± 4.7, and 25.4 ± 3.5, respectively. In terms of creativity levels, 75.2% of the students ( = 542) had moderate creativity and 23.8% ( = 171) had high creativity. A significant relationship was observed between creativity and educational level ( = 0.006). Multiple logistic regression results showed that educational level with an odds ratio of 0.59 was associated with a decreased chance of creativity.

CONCLUSION

Most of the students had moderate creativity. Moreover, among the factors examined in this study, variables other than the field of the study and educational level had no significant effect on students' creativity. Therefore, using collaborative and cooperative learning and problem-based learning strategies, teachers' critical thinking styles, establishing teamwork groups, concept mapping, and using innovative and creative teaching methods can help to enhance students' creativity.

摘要

引言

各级教育的最终目标是培养和促进学生的创造力。本研究旨在确定并比较医学生的创造力及其影响因素。

研究对象与方法

在这项于2019年开展的横断面研究中,通过分层整群随机抽样选取了沙赫鲁德公立和私立大学的720名医学生进行研究。使用吉尔福德创造力问卷收集数据。采用卡方检验、皮尔逊相关系数、t检验和多因素逻辑回归对数据进行分析,显著性水平设定为0.05。

结果

学生的平均创造力得分为131.4±13.8。流畅性、精细性、独创性和灵活性维度的平均创造力得分分别为49.2±5.3、22.1±3.4、34.8±4.7和25.4±3.5。在创造力水平方面,75.2%的学生(n = 542)具有中等创造力,23.8%(n = 171)具有高创造力。观察到创造力与教育水平之间存在显著关系(P = 0.006)。多因素逻辑回归结果显示,教育水平的比值比为0.59,与创造力机会降低相关。

结论

大多数学生具有中等创造力。此外,在本研究考察的因素中,除了学习领域和教育水平外,其他变量对学生的创造力没有显著影响。因此,采用合作学习和基于问题的学习策略、教师的批判性思维方式、建立团队合作小组、概念图绘制以及使用创新和创造性的教学方法有助于提高学生的创造力。